Posted by thuso on July 17, 2005, at 22:02:36 [reposted on July 22, 2005, at 14:23:30 | original URL]
In reply to Re: Chemical balance: LeChatlier's Principle » Sarah T., posted by so on July 17, 2005, at 21:42:14
> > > > > > > > hello there, sarah...a pleasure to "see" you, as well...and homeostasis would, as you note, be far more apt: nice catch!
> > >
>
> So you concede that "chemical imbalance" might not be the most precise description of the etiology of any specific mental disorder?
>
> All the same, we have no more evidence that any specific mental disorder is a result of upset homeostasis than we do that disorders are the result of a homeostasis established in response to external, cognitive, behavioral or learned influences.Ummmm....shouldn't you be discussing this somewhere other than Admin?????
poster:thuso
thread:529166
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20050718/msgs/531639.html