Posted by Michael Bell on December 26, 2004, at 21:58:59
In reply to Re: Nardil + reboxetine = no hypertension. True? » Michael Bell, posted by KaraS on December 26, 2004, at 18:54:16
> > Anybody else heard this? I read about this in a study, but I think it was actually the reboxetine.com website.
> >
> > However, non related studies I've read about reboxetine is that it does inhibit the release of norepinephrine. Now, other than the sexual side effects, if reboxetine + nardil truly negates the hypertensive crisis problem, then I'm ecstatic.
> >
> > Anybody have experience with this?
>
>
> I read about it at a site that we're no longer allowed to mention here. It would be interesting to hear from someone who has actually used it in that way.
>
> Your post above ("think I'm going back to Nardil BUT...") was really excellent. It asked a lot of questions that I would like to see answers for also. If you don't get many responses, please consider reposting that as a new thread with a title that more accurately describes the kinds of questions in it. I think it might be read more that way and get more responses.
>
> Take care,
> Kara
>
> Hey Kara, thanks for the reply. I think you're right, I might have to repost the hypertensive questions under its own heading. Pity that there are not more studies to back up the one about Reboxetine and maois. While Rebox sucks as monotherapy for SP (for me anyway) I would definitely use it as an adjunct to diminish the negative side effects of Nardil.
>
poster:Michael Bell
thread:434366
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20041223/msgs/434484.html