Posted by dJinnicht on September 5, 2004, at 16:27:53
In reply to Re: NMDA is neurotoxic to humans:fast forward to N, posted by Dave001 on September 5, 2004, at 15:28:20
> > *always helps to actually post something*
previous message was posted blank
> > *ding*
slang for an aHa nanosecond> > here are the 2004 papers explaining the mechanisms. all of your references are rather dated. the paper that was withdrawn was done so because it demonstrated DA toxicity.
nice cutting and pasting.(sic) you left out the link to the new papers. DA=dopamine. the paper that was withdrawn was 'the 7 year monkey study'
>
> <snip>
>
> What on earth are you talking about??
look up. right over your head.
>I can't find a word of coherency in your drivel.
a MS in chemistry can solve that problem.>Can you please clarify what it is that you're trying to say?
see above and original post. and, of course, a whole lotta chemistry from inorganic thru biochem.
> And why did you change the thread title to include "NMDA?" "Ecstacy" is *MDMA* (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine).
>can you draw that for me please?
>human error. NMDA is
1. a glutumate receptor, target of many GABAergic AED's such as depakote, lamactil, Gabatril, and alcohol, the kind bars serve; N-methyl-d-aspartate which is gated by AMPA receptors targeted by such drugs as topamax/topirimate, zonegran, the fabled AMPAkines.
and aspartame, of course.
but you knew all that, geZeus.
~
============/dJ
>
> Dave
poster:dJinnicht
thread:383476
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20040904/msgs/386794.html