Posted by Chairman_MAO on January 30, 2004, at 12:16:13
In reply to IfTransdermal Selegiline is approved Sunday......., posted by bipolarspectrum on January 30, 2004, at 11:17:27
If my cynicism proves correct, the FDA will not approve this. Too many other psych drugs could be obsoleted by it, and I firmly believe the FDA is in the pocket of all major pharmaceutical companies. Think I'm paranoid? Then why is Eli Lilly exempt from civil action in the HOMELAND SECURITY BILL? If they have that level of power, corrupting the FDA would be child's play by comparison, no?
Let's hope I'm wrong about EmSam (transdermal selegiline).
--- from http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/12/12/eveningnews/main532886.shtml --
(CBS) It's been a mystery in Washington for weeks. Just before President Bush signed the homeland security bill into law an unknown member of Congress inserted a provision into the legislation that blocks lawsuits against the maker of a controversial vaccine preservative called "thimerosal," used in vaccines that are given to children.
Drug giant Eli Lilly and Company makes thimerosal. It's the mercury in the preservative that many parents say causes autism in thousands of children – like Mary Kate Kilpatrick.
Asked if she thinks her daughter is a victim of thimerosal, Mary Kate's mother, Kathy Kilpatrick, says, "I think autism is mercury poisoning."
But nobody in Congress would admit to adding the provision, reports CBS News Correspondent Jim Acosta – until now.
House Majority Leader Dick Armey tells CBS News he did it to keep vaccine-makers from going out of business under the weight of mounting lawsuits.
"I did it and I'm proud of it," says Armey, R-Texas.
"It's a matter of national security," Armey says. "We need their vaccines if the country is attacked with germ weapons."
Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind., isn't buying it. The grandfather of an autistic child, Burton says Armey slipped the provision in at the last minute, too late for debate.
"And I said, 'Who told you to put it in?'" He said, 'No, they asked me to do it at the White House.'"
Critics say the Bush family and the administration have too many ties to Eli Lilly. There's President Bush's father, who sat on the company's board in the 1970's; White House budget director Mitch Daniels, once an Eli Lilly executive; and Eli Lilly CEO Sidney Taurel, who serves on the president's homeland security advisory council.
Officials at the drug giant insist they did nothing wrong. "No one, not our CEO, not myself, not anyone who works with me asked the White House to insert this legislation," said Eli Lilly spokeswoman Debra Steelman.
But Kathy Kilpatrick and her husband Michael argue that the thimerosal provision is not designed to protect the nation, but rather to protect Eli Lilly.
Asked what he'd say to a congressman who came forward and admitted he was responsible for inserting the provision, Michael Kilpatrick says, "I would ask him if he knew he was protecting mercury being shot into our kids."
Kathy Kilpatrick asks, "Why would anyone want to save Eli Lilly on our children's backs?"
Because Armey is retiring at the end of the year, some say the outgoing majority leader is the perfect fall guy to take the heat and shield the White House from embarrassment.
It's a claim both the White house and Army deny.
poster:Chairman_MAO
thread:307271
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20040127/msgs/307301.html