Posted by Questionmark on November 28, 2003, at 8:11:53
In reply to Re: VERY GOOD WORK, TEP! NARDIL USERS READ!!!! » jerrympls, posted by ace on November 27, 2003, at 16:23:34
It's kinda funny. Reading all these posts about how the new version/formulation of Nardil wasn't working as well as the old, i was so worried and scared that my next refill of Nardil would be subpar and give me withdrawal symptoms and what not. After reading the descriptions of the two versions, however, it turns out that i've been taking the new version all along (i know this because i did have a small amount of the old Nardil with an earlier prescription, so i know what the external differences are). i'm sorry, i guess this isn't funny at all for those of you who have been adversely affected by having to switch to the new Nardil. But..
i guess my point to this is that it could be possible that these supposed differences in old and new Nardil are just psychological. Hopefully that's the case. Now that would really anger me if i heard someone say that and i was sure that i really was feeling a difference, so i'm sorry if that's the case. i meant no offense. Just wanted to point out that possibility. But man, if there really is that much difference in efficacy btwn old and new Nardil, i can't imagine how effective the old version would be. 60mg/day of the new version has still been virtually miraculous for me. Anyway, i'm thankful that, thus far, i don't have to worry about this crap. Good luck people.
poster:Questionmark
thread:283363
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20031126/msgs/284704.html