Posted by Larry Hoover on July 13, 2003, at 10:39:20
In reply to Re: NAD instead of NADH? Larry may be..., posted by Maximus on July 13, 2003, at 10:24:25
> Well, due to our poor canadian dollar, i have found this link:
>
> http://www.naturesnutrition.com/SKU/14921.htm
>
> It is NAD. Is NAD as good as NADH?
>
> Any inputs?
>
> Thanks!Well, I haven't used that product. My understanding is that NAD will be decomposed in the stomach, unless it is enteric coated. In other words, you might as well use niacin, and hope your body can reconstitute NAD/NADH as needed.
I think Swiss changed the label because they realized their product was not equivalent to Enada NADH (cynical view). Swiss is a local brand (headquarters about 100 km from my home), and I use many of their products. But I don't use this one.
The Enada product all comes from an Austrian company, and their patented process. There are different companies marketing the Enada product, but I think they're all selling the same stuff.
Lar
poster:Larry Hoover
thread:241412
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20030708/msgs/241431.html