Re: The Eternal Return of The Catch 22 » fachad

Posted by BrittPark on December 30, 2002, at 16:44:56

In reply to The Eternal Return of The Catch 22 » FredPotter, posted by fachad on December 30, 2002, at 12:37:19

Thanks for the references to those excellent posts.
I think, actually, that things are even crazier than Catch 22. Consider the adult depression patient who one way or another happens to know the Schedule II stimulants are very effective for his/her depression. Catch 22. Now consider the large number of GPs prescribing stimulants to children willy nilly, given the slightest evidence of ADHD. I don't mean to say that most children prescribed stimulants don't need them. I don't know. I hope, however, that people will appreciate the irony of the two prescribing attitudes.
Cheers to all,
Britt

Thread

Benzodiazepines ineffective or dosage ineffective? FredPotter 12/29/02
Re: Benzodiazepines ineffective or dosage ineffective? FredPotter 12/29/02
Re: Benzodiazepines ineffective or dosage ineffective? Jackster 12/30/02
Re: Benzodiazepines ineffective or dosage ineffective? gheld 12/30/02
The Eternal Return of The Catch 22 » FredPotter fachad 12/30/02
Re: The Eternal Return of The Catch 22 » fachad BrittPark 12/30/02
Re: The Eternal Return of The Catch 22 FredPotter 12/30/02
Re: The Eternal Return of The Catch 22 » BrittPark fachad 12/31/02

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:BrittPark thread:133718
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20021230/msgs/133829.html