Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Site

Posted by Jaynee on April 22, 2002, at 12:36:14

In reply to Site, posted by Jaynee on April 22, 2002, at 12:13:05

I take IP-6, because it helps to block the amount of iron I absorb from my food. Of course excess iron can cause treatment resistant bi-polar depression.

nositol phosphates with different numbers of phosphate groups influence
iron absorption in humans.

Sandberg AS, Brune M, Carlsson NG, Hallberg L, Skoglund E, Rossander-Hulthen L.

Department of Food Science, Chalmers University of Technology, University of Goteborg,
Sahlgrenska Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden. Ann-Sofie.Sandberg@FSc.Chalmers.se

BACKGROUND: Inositol hexaphosphate (IP(6)) is a well-known inhibitor of iron absorption,
whereas the effects of the less-phosphorylated derivatives of IP(6) are less known.
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to investigate the effects of inositol tri-, tetra-, and
pentaphosphates (IP(3), IP(4), and IP(5), respectively) on iron absorption in humans. DESIGN:
Iron absorption was measured in 5 experiments from single meals by extrinsic labeling with
(55)Fe and (59)Fe and determination of whole-body retention and the erythrocyte uptake of
isotopes. In experiments 1-3 the meals contained white-wheat rolls to which 10 mg P as IP(5),
IP(4), or IP(3), respectively, was added. Inositol 1,2,6-triphosphate [Ins(1,2, 6)P(3)] and a
mixture of isomers of IP(4) and IP(5) were studied. White-wheat rolls contained 10 mg P as
IP(3) + IP(4) and 2 mg P as IP(5) + IP(6) in experiment 4 and 20 mg P as IP(3) + IP(4) and 3
mg P as IP(5) + IP(6) in experiment 5; inositol phosphates were obtained via fermentation of
sodium phytate. Each experiment had 8-11 subjects. RESULTS: In experiment 1, iron
absorption was reduced by 39%, whereas there was no significant effect on iron absorption in
experiments 2 and 3. In experiments 4 and 5, iron absorption was reduced by 54% and 64%,
respectively, suggesting that IP(3) and IP(4) contributed to the inhibitory effect.
CONCLUSIONS: IP(5) has an inhibitory effect on iron absorption, whereas IP(3) and IP(4) in
isolated form have no such effect. IP(3) and IP(4) in processed food contribute to the negative
effect on iron absorption, presumably by binding iron between different inositol phosphates. To
improve iron absorption from cereals and legumes, degradation of inositol phosphates needs to
be to less-phosphorylated inositol phosphates than IP(3).

PMID: 10426701 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]



Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:Jaynee thread:103679
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20020416/msgs/103814.html