Re: escitaloproam » Roo

Posted by IsoM on December 19, 2001, at 13:14:47

In reply to Re: escitaloproam, posted by Roo on December 19, 2001, at 9:01:58

I really can't say if it would have less sexual side-effects. Probably, as the side effects are supposed to come from the inactive form but maybe someone else can add some concrete about that.
> Is it supposed to have less sexual side effects?
> I notice they don't mention that...

Thread

escitaloproam geno 12/18/01
Re: escitaloproam stjames 12/18/01
Re: escitaloproam IsoM 12/19/01
Re: escitaloproam Roo 12/19/01
Re: escitaloproam » Roo IsoM 12/19/01
Re: escitaloproam Bill L 12/20/01

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:IsoM thread:87325
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20011213/msgs/87411.html

	for
in