Re: PELLMELL, others: more on med trial length: » stjames

Posted by pellmell on July 12, 2001, at 17:47:51

In reply to Re: PELLMELL, others: more on med trial length:, posted by stjames on July 12, 2001, at 17:00:02

> james here....
>
> I don not agree. 4 weeks min. I never could tell by 2 weeks.
I'll agree with you. You should wait at least four weeks before you decide if the drug is having a theraputic effect.
But if the side-effects of a drug are still significantly interfering with your life after 14 days, do you still think it's worth sticking it out?
-pm

Thread

PELLMELL, others: more on med trial length: Janelle 7/12/01
Re: PELLMELL, others: more on med trial length: stjames 7/12/01
Re: PELLMELL, others: more on med trial length: » stjames pellmell 7/12/01
PELLMELL: U genius! What's monoaminerginic mean? Janelle 7/12/01
Thanks, JAMES, please read: Janelle 7/12/01
Re: PELLMELL: U genius! What's monoaminerginic mean? » Janelle pellmell 7/12/01
Re: PELLMELL: U genius! What's monoaminerginic mean? Janelle 7/12/01
Woops, PELLMELL, pls read post right above here! Janelle 7/12/01
Re: PELLMELL, others: more on med trial length: stjames 7/12/01
Re: PELLMELL, others: more on med trial length: » stjames Jackster 7/13/01

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:pellmell thread:69873
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20010708/msgs/69885.html

	for
in