Posted by JohnL on June 1, 2001, at 15:21:42
In reply to Dr. Martin Jensen/John L.-Question about method, posted by Shirley 2 on May 31, 2001, at 6:44:28
> John,
>
> As an FYI, I finally emailed Dr. Jensen about 3 months ago and was disappointed with his response. It sounded like a canned reply and it seemed like he hadn't read any of my questions. I asked about telephone consultations with my psychiatrist and essentially, he said that I had to live in California for about a month and then would have to see him personally. I understand there are rules he has to follow but in my opinion, the response could have been more personable.
>
> But just because I had a bad experience with him and perhaps I caught him during a bad time, doesn't mean I don't doubt his methods. Anyway, I just realized I have a enough samples to do a mini version of what he does. I got really excited but then I realized that he has never explained how he handles situations regarding PMS. Since I have had great success with drugs only for them to worsen my PMS, it would seem like I shouldn't be doing any testing during that period. Am I right or is there another way of compensating for this? Obviously, you haven't experienced the situation:)) but I would be interested in any thoughts you might have. Of course, if any females have had similar experiences, I would love to hear from you.
>
> ShirleyHi Shirley. Since you understand Jensen's methodology and reasoning, there is no need to have him as your doctor. I wouldn't be concerned that he left you with a sour taste. You can take ownership of your own mini trials without his help. Granted, he has a unique ability to figure out what a negative or neutral response means, and what to do next, but you and I can accomplish the same thing.
The PMS is over my head, so I don't have much to offer on that. It seems to me though that the right med(s) will not only work well, but prevent PMS at the same time, not worsen it.
Though Jensen shoots for one week trial comparisons of different meds, I personally prefer to lengthen that to two weeks. It's kind of a decent middle of the road compromise between Jensen and conventional stances.
Hang in there. I wish I could help more.
poster:JohnL
thread:64846
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20010530/msgs/65071.html