Posted by shellie on February 7, 2001, at 14:16:25
In reply to Re: Dr. Martin Jesen-Q for JohnL, posted by JohnL on February 6, 2001, at 3:37:55
> 4) Until the nine drugs had been tried, there was little reason to speak with Dr Jensen again just yet. I could have if I wanted to, but it wasn't necessary. He had armed me and my local doc with enough instructions and ideas to keep us busy for a while. But if I had finished sampling all nine drugs and had no luck with any of them, then another phone visit would have been needed.
>
> I just happened to find the right drugs and never needed another visit.John L- truely not trying to be controversial (having read a lot of controversy in the past concerning Dr. Jensen), I am curious why you respect him so much since he gave you nine medications that did not work. And after talking to you for an hour. Is it the technique of trying things quickly that impressed you. Do you feel at all a bit taken that he was not head on, on any of his recommendations and that you had to find your own, partly out of the U.S. I know Michael F. highly respects him because he was a lot closer in picking the right combination (and an unlikely combination), but with you and Neal, it feels like he wasn't even close. Shellie
poster:shellie
thread:53318
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20010131/msgs/53452.html