Re: ECT

Posted by bob on May 16, 2000, at 21:40:40

In reply to Re: ECT, posted by Adam on May 16, 2000, at 21:28:26

Adam,
Thanks for the detailed and even-handed account. I found it quite informative. It's still a bit disquieting for me, since your experiences confirm both the "good" and the "bad" of modern ECT.
But I guess we never get any clear, unequivocable answers in our field anyway.
cheers,
bob

Thread

ECT Nancy 5/10/00
T Nancy--Re: ECT: sensitive topic tina 5/10/00
Re: T Nancy--Re: ECT stjames 5/10/00
Re: T Nancy--Re: ECT Greg 5/10/00
Re: T Nancy--Re: ECT quilter 5/11/00
Re: ECT/for MedLib and BorBor Mark H. 5/12/00
Re: To Nancy--Re: ECT Mark H. 5/12/00
Re: To Nancy--Re: ECT SLS 5/12/00
Re: To Nancy--Re: ECT Mark H. 5/12/00
Re: ECT Adam 5/16/00
Re: ECT bob 5/16/00
Re: ECT, bob Adam 5/17/00
Re: ECT, Adam Chris A. 5/18/00
Editorial Concern, Too boBB 5/18/00
Re: Editorial Concern, Too bob 5/18/00
Re: Editorial Concern, Too - off topic to bob Cam W. 5/18/00
Re: Editorial Concern, Too - off topic to Cam bob 5/19/00
Re: Editorial Concern, Too - off topic to Cam Cindy W 5/19/00
Re: Editorial Concern, Too Adam 5/19/00
Re: Editorial Concern + healthy cynicism bob 5/20/00
Re: Editorial Concern, Too Chris A. 5/20/00
Re: ECT, bob Elizabeth 5/22/00
Re: ECT, bob Adam 5/23/00
...
Re: ECT- Unilateral vs. Bilateral, Side effects ? Chris A. 6/6/00

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:bob thread:33082
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20000508/msgs/33722.html