Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: ? for Saint J: dexe vs Adderall

Posted by saint james on October 21, 1999, at 2:10:14

In reply to ? for Saint J: dexe vs Adderall, posted by dove on October 18, 1999, at 10:24:33

> S.J. wrote:
> I also question the use of L-amphetamine, as it has negative side effects. Another "least patentable difference" ?
>

James here...

Adderal was on the market as Orbitol till the 70's, was pulled because of abuse. Was re-introduced as Adderal as of late.

Adderal is a 50/50 mix of D and L amphetamine.
D and L refer to isomers, isomers mean a chemical with the same # of atoms, but in a different arrangement. D is "left handed" arrangement, L is the right. Biology mostly runs on D isomers, the universe is rather left handed, though there are exceptions, like the aminos. Look on the net about isomers, you really need graphics to understand this ! Many times the L is not active in humans, or is not useful, or has negative side effects.

Dex is all d-amphetamine, proven to be active in humans. L-amphetamine has some action, but tends to have more negative effects. Reported are: makes you more shakey, dysphoria, sweaty, ect.
The D vers is more smooth feeling.

"Least patentable difference" is the least chemical difference you can change a compound from the patent to get another patent. In this case it is the addition of L-amphetamine, and a few other things.

j


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:saint james thread:13193
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/19991028/msgs/13560.html