Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: News - Antidepressants Vindicated? jhj

Posted by linkadge on September 11, 2007, at 18:16:47

In reply to Re: News - Antidepressants Vindicated?, posted by jhj on September 11, 2007, at 8:08:39

Untill very recently, drug companies did not need to disclose the trial results on many drugs. They can just keep testing and retesting a drug untill it happens to outperform placebo.

Prime Example:

Go to the GSK clinical trial registry for lamotrigine.

http://ctr.gsk.co.uk/Summary/lamotrigine/studylist.asp

You'd expect that since the drug is FDA approved for bipolar disorder that it outperform placebo right? Wrong. There are like 30 trials resitered there, for things ranging from unipolar depression, bipolar disorder to schizohprenia. Sure there are one or two trials that show the drug is more effective than placebo, but the majority show no such effectiveness.

Also read an article at, about bias on a decent site.

http://www.mcmanweb.com/news.htm

GSK has chosen to be fully honest about disclosing clinical trial informaiton, including those from failed clinical trials, but other companies are not being so open as they know how it will affect public preceptions of drugs.

They likely have failed trials that they are not disclosing. And the FDA does not require that failed trials be used to calculate the overall effectivness of a drug.

Publication bias also affects the viewpoints of the public. Simply put, effective trials get the attention.

A quote from:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/7/64

"The prevailing view amongst psychiatrists is that antidepressant medication is of proven efficacy in reducing the severity and duration of major depression and should therefore be used as its first line of treatment [1]. However systematic reviews of randomised double blind placebo controlled trials of antidepressant medication indicate that differences in outcome between drug and placebo arms are often marginal, and may be exaggerated by selective publication or even deliberate misrepresentation"

A meta analysis of placebo effect in 19 clinical trials.

http://www.geocities.com/oppressionactivist/METAANALYSIS_OF_PLACEBO_htm.htm


Also from:

http://www.vaccinationnews.com/DailyNews/June2002/CanPlacebo25.htm

In a soon to be published study, Dr. Arif Khan, a psychiatrist at the Northwest Clinical Research Center in Washington, analyzed the Food and Drug Administration's database of 52 clinical trials in depression, involving nine new antidepressants, conducted from 1985 to 2000. ***Since the agency requires drug companies to report all data from all studies for drugs under development, the database can give a more accurate picture of a new drug's efficacy than the medical journals***, where positive findings are far more likely to be reported than negative ones.

Dr. Khan found that in only 48 percent of the 52 clinical trials was the antidepressant superior to the placebo.


Linkadge




Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:linkadge thread:781684
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20070911/msgs/782296.html