Psycho-Babble Politics Thread 1111114

Shown: posts 1 to 3 of 3. This is the beginning of the thread.

 

poos

Posted by alexandra_k on July 2, 2020, at 5:56:47

some of the poos stuff is interesting...

apparently the ratio of bacteroidies to.... i forget... some other one... is important.

as a marker of health.

(of course it is dynamic in 'you are what you eat' fashion)

fu.... something beginning with 'f'.

and it's tied to 'fast fermenters' vs 'slow fermenters' aka 'how much you poop...

and it turns out that pooping more frequntly (e.g., once per day) is 'better' health-wise than pooping less frequently (e.g., less than once per day.

that the frequency has to do with the bacteria.

so...

i eat oats for breakfast. i don't soak them. i poop them out within 40 minutes. apparently if i soaked them they would be 'more digestable'. but i'm not starving. i don't need the nutrients. rather, i need to have them pass out my colon within about 40 miniutes.... to... i don't know... be firberous. prevent colon cancer. flush me out.

and they do it. yep. end story. good poop. every morning. within 40 minutes of eating. end story. that's it.

of course... it doesn't smell good. and it can be bloated... but it passed out easy and it's done. and that's the point -- yes??

i dunno...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CoIDScAzog

 

hong kong laws

Posted by alexandra_k on July 2, 2020, at 21:51:43

In reply to poos, posted by alexandra_k on July 2, 2020, at 5:56:47

Sigh.

I think we have laws (technically on the books) that are comparable to the ones that were just introduced to HOng Kong.

We have laws against treason etc. And I think the maximum sentance is lifetime imprisonment.

Would our people riot if we didn't have those kinds of laws... And the government wanted to introduce them all of a sudden?

Not sure.

Pretty sure the people wouldn't want the laws to be introduced if they knew what laws the government wanted to introduce.

Our government relies on the whole gamma babies picked in alcohol not being able to read kind of a strategy. smoke some ganja (hey it's not political interference if snoop dog and some mma guy say to do it -- it's political interference if some americans say to read the literature on teh consequences of legalisation in states where it has been legalised).

Which makes it clear the government wants the laws to change.

mj makes people complacent.

makes people put up with more.

the head of the state services commission. the minister of EVERYTHIGN.

the fact that the 20 per cent thing wasn't done. the laws weren't proposed and passed in a timely fashion.

he was busy thinking how we could con more people into signing up for the trades

(we have no intention of signing them off shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh)

 

Re: no access to justice

Posted by alexandra_k on July 8, 2020, at 6:57:52

In reply to hong kong laws, posted by alexandra_k on July 2, 2020, at 21:51:43

apparently the 'legal aid' system pays too little and requires too much paperwork.

i have the solution:

say 'in exchange for professional practice certificate you are required (amongst all the other requirements) to do... [I don't know... 80 hours?] of pro bono work per year'.

and if people try and cheat it... then 160 hours... until they learn / never obtain paid employment as lawyers.

problem solved.



This is the end of the thread.


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Politics | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.