Psycho-Babble Administration Thread 1102144

Shown: posts 5 to 29 of 40. Go back in thread:

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by ert on December 15, 2018, at 15:36:28

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by rjlockhart37 on December 14, 2018, at 16:52:03

rjlockhart37:

Hsiung of course deletes his posts but not those of the participants, if desired. For the detriment of those suffering individuals who gave their sensitive data. That is obvious since it happened to me. Most participants just clicked through the sign up procedure. It is not an appropriate procedure. Not all posts get indexed by a search engine. Theyre not all caught.

Robert C. Hsiung violates laws and risks lawsuits. US law, Europe and other than Europe law is violated. IMO these violations are at least a misdemeanor. The GDPR allows very high fines, for facebook up to 2 billions, in that case it would be less. I have given my suggestions and time to reflect. I will see what happens.

Robert C. Hsiung is definitely a bit evil concerning that matter. Of course he knows that he violates laws, the participants personal rights and sets the out to danger once they posted.

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by ert on December 15, 2018, at 16:53:43

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by ert on December 15, 2018, at 15:36:28

Unpleasant postings or archives that could be used against him he deletes but phrases and postings that is to someones detriment he wont delete

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by ert on December 16, 2018, at 0:10:53

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by ert on December 15, 2018, at 16:53:43

rjlockhart37:

for me the admin archive seems consistent, it ends at the end of the year 2015 and the new page starts at the end of the year 2015.

Have not checked older years.

but I honestly do not know if this really is consistent since I have never read or checked this.

your're postings rjlockhart37, are not all caught by a search engine.

as stated in the faq's, Dr. Robert C. Hsiung will only take responsibility for his own posts but will not take responsibility for the posts of the participants.

Even though that stated, Hsiung won't revoke the participants permissions and therefore claims ownership of their intellectual property.

but because he factually does not own their posts, he steals their property for his benefit.

Dr. Robert C. Hsiung steals the property of the participants but he won't care if something is to their detriment.

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by ert on December 16, 2018, at 0:30:29

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by ert on December 16, 2018, at 0:10:53

> rjlockhart37:
>
> for me the admin archive seems consistent, it ends at the end of the year 2015 and the new page starts at the end of the year 2015.
>
> Have not checked older years.
>
> but I honestly do not know if this really is consistent since I have never read or checked this.
>
> your're postings rjlockhart37, are not all caught by a search engine.
>
> as stated in the faq's, Dr. Robert C. Hsiung will only take responsibility for his own posts but will not take responsibility for the posts of the participants.
>
> Even though that stated, Hsiung won't revoke the participants permissions and therefore claims ownership of their intellectual property.
>
> but because he factually does not own their posts, he steals their property for his benefit.
>
> Dr. Robert C. Hsiung steals the property of the participants but he won't care if something is to their detriment.

Dr. Robert C. Hsiung not only steals, but subsequently lies that he deletes posts or content of the posts, furthermore he lies and gives misleading and false statements that deputies can edit and delete posts.

Neither the sign up and the faq's fulfill legal requirements nor does the website fulfill any legal requirements to conduct any medical studies and the referral of patients.

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by rjlockhart37 on December 16, 2018, at 0:46:16

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by ert on December 16, 2018, at 0:30:29

yeah he's a mastermind mind - we must revolt and and post as many obnoxious posts possible for him to keep deleting - no wonder i couldn't find my other posts

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by rjlockhart37 on December 16, 2018, at 0:51:37

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by rjlockhart37 on December 16, 2018, at 0:46:16

i'm not trying to be pessimist, you know maybe if we got on his good side, he would maybe listen to some our suggestions, i made a suggestion on babble here on the board to make babble a database, not sure if that idea was taken seriously but we got put on a new server....babble was down for about 6 months, "same furniture, different location" what dr-bob had said

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by ert on December 16, 2018, at 0:51:54

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by rjlockhart37 on December 16, 2018, at 0:46:16

> yeah he's a mastermind mind - we must revolt and and post as many obnoxious posts possible for him to keep deleting - no wonder i couldn't find my other posts

take care rjlockhart37, once you have surpassed the threshold you could get blocked.

there is no democracy here. to be a bit evil and manipulative it needs a certain intelligence.

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by rjlockhart37 on December 16, 2018, at 0:55:17

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by ert on December 16, 2018, at 0:51:54

i was making a joke, maybe the way I post jokes are not so well done, no i'm much more civil and down to earth than i used to be on babble, it used to be cried wolf, and did drama shows over something a small emotional event. I've changed and continue to change

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by ert on December 16, 2018, at 0:58:56

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by rjlockhart37 on December 16, 2018, at 0:55:17

> i was making a joke, maybe the way I post jokes are not so well done, no i'm much more civil and down to earth than i used to be on babble, it used to be cried wolf, and did drama shows over something a small emotional event. I've changed and continue to change
>
>

yeah, it seems for me that you're a good guy and maybe an even better one in real life than the one here...

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by ert on December 16, 2018, at 1:45:06

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by ert on December 16, 2018, at 0:58:56

> > i was making a joke, maybe the way I post jokes are not so well done, no i'm much more civil and down to earth than i used to be on babble, it used to be cried wolf, and did drama shows over something a small emotional event. I've changed and continue to change
> >
> >
>
> yeah, it seems for me that you're a good guy and maybe an even better one in real life than the one here...

Personally, I do not know if Hsiung deleted any postings or archives and in particular especially for him unpleasant postings or archives. From what I have read, I know that he does not delete, however.

At least he or his deputy did not block me yet. Even though I criticized here, but IMO justified. so there also is something, little good.

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by ert on December 16, 2018, at 2:00:04

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by ert on December 16, 2018, at 1:45:06

I suppose, but only suppose because I do not know for sure, that Hsiung never deleted a post.

Some postings are just not indexed and do not pop up when searched with an engine.

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by rjlockhart37 on December 16, 2018, at 20:17:40

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by ert on December 16, 2018, at 2:00:04

yeah, they may just be hiding somewhere, in the server....

there's not much blocking here anymore, the deputies used to be like police officers and blocked frequently, this old town has had it's day and lost it's sheriff and deputies, we're free to write whatever we want for now. Only at the cost of it being read on google by many many people, so no sensitive information

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by rjlockhart37 on December 16, 2018, at 20:22:14

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by rjlockhart37 on December 16, 2018, at 20:17:40

but still Hsiung can block posters, and delete them so were not totally free. We have the sheriff but no deputies

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance » rjlockhart37

Posted by SLS on December 17, 2018, at 9:37:06

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by rjlockhart37 on December 14, 2018, at 16:40:37

> babblers vs the Hsiung


What makes you say thia?


- Scott

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance » rjlockhart37

Posted by SLS on December 17, 2018, at 9:40:35

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by rjlockhart37 on December 16, 2018, at 0:46:16

> yeah he's a mastermind mind - we must revolt and and post as many obnoxious posts possible for him to keep deleting - no wonder i couldn't find my other posts

Who will this benefit?

I think you should announce to the Medication board your idea. Let's see how many people agree with you and would favor the permanent shutdown of this website.


- Scott

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance » rjlockhart37

Posted by SLS on December 17, 2018, at 9:44:55

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by rjlockhart37 on December 16, 2018, at 20:22:14

> but still Hsiung can block posters, and delete them so were not totally free. We have the sheriff but no deputies

So, you would like to see the return of deputies? What sorts of things would you like to see them do?


- Scott

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance » ert

Posted by SLS on December 17, 2018, at 9:48:53

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by ert on December 15, 2018, at 16:53:43

> Unpleasant postings or archives that could be used against him he deletes but phrases and postings that is to someones detriment he wont delete

Gosh. I didn't know that. How did you come upon this information? Interesting.


- Scott

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by ert on December 17, 2018, at 12:27:07

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance » ert, posted by SLS on December 17, 2018, at 9:48:53

> > Unpleasant postings or archives that could be used against him he deletes but phrases and postings that is to someones detriment he wont delete
>
> Gosh. I didn't know that. How did you come upon this information? Interesting.
>
>
> - Scott

rjlockhart37 wrote that he thinks the ruler deletes posts or archives. However, I think that when he searched the archive, the engine maybe didn't catch everything.

I don't know myself. Maybe he has never deleted a post.

Obviously, the ruler and mastermind is still here and lives. Good. He removed the social network (facebook, twitter...) buttons. Likely, his psychologist coworker told him that this could upset participants, since the could not have had that idea.

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by ert on December 17, 2018, at 12:29:51

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by ert on December 17, 2018, at 12:27:07

no. the buttons are still there. I err. on android I didn't see it.

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance » SLS

Posted by rjlockhart37 on December 17, 2018, at 18:11:07

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance » rjlockhart37, posted by SLS on December 17, 2018, at 9:40:35

it was a joke, not litterly.....like we just need post things to get dr-bob's attention, it was sarcasm. But it wanst in a joke format, that's why it sounded literal

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by rjlockhart37 on December 17, 2018, at 18:15:27

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance » rjlockhart37, posted by SLS on December 17, 2018, at 9:44:55

the deputies were like moderators, and yeah that would be good to see them back, they could do restart what they used to be doing, babble kinda went vacant and there not here anymore, so ... any type of offensive comments are not moderated, but that's not good....so i apologize for anything that seemed offensive

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by sigismund on December 18, 2018, at 1:09:52

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance » rjlockhart37, posted by SLS on December 17, 2018, at 9:44:55

I can't recall how many types of control I have seen here. 5? 10?

It reminds me (only a little) a little of what was said about the citizens of the USSR. The government fought them, and eventually the government won.

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by ert on December 20, 2018, at 7:48:04

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by sigismund on December 18, 2018, at 1:09:52

sigismund,

I think that the ruler should not be a smaller version of Putin.

The rulers brain obviously thinks in a way that he could loose legal implications, maybe he should do something. But his brain does not think in a way that it should be done lawfully from the beginning on, so that nobody gets hurt and everyone can realize the will over her/his own sensitive property.

Has the ruler ever thought that someone may not like it, when her/his sensitive property gets stolen?

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by ert on December 21, 2018, at 4:53:04

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by ert on December 20, 2018, at 7:48:04

I think telegram could be a viable option.

-own posts can be exported or the whole chat (and then further processed e.g. merged to pdf files). With adobe dc, freecommander (plug in) or totalcommander (plug in) it can also be searched inside multiple doc files like pdf files
-It can be set a description for a user name. When someone changes the user name it can be used the same or similar description so that the person will be recognized.
-it can be made two people chats
-it can be checked who is online
-it can be called someone but also blocked from calling
-it can be uploaded media or also blocked from uploading when it disturbs too much
-it can quickly searched through the chat with terms like lithium
-it can be jumped back to a specific date e.g. one week back and then read through all new postings.
-It can be used an avatar e.g. a pet as a face replacement
-Interesting posts can be quickly saved by forwarding them to saved messages
-Available even for linux
-The posts get deleted after an set time of inactivity (up to 1 year)
-They would be less anxious to post and therefore more open minded and honest
-Short blocks for rogue users are possible
-The problem is finding the groups. Therefore it must be made links to the groups on a websites.
-There is a learning curve but the software easy to understand and lightweight
-Everyone can delete or edit her/his posts
I try to help a bit because if nothing happens soon or later it will have negative implications for the ruler

article 27 of the gdpr also requires an eu representative that has oversight over the data processed. Therefore an independent person who has oversight and deletes data.


Portuguese DPA imposes 400,000 fine on hospital for two violations of the GDPR
Must read

fines

Holiday Special, 17 December 2018 Issue
The Portuguese data protection authority Comissão Nacional de Protecção de Dados or CNPD imposed two separate penalties amounting to a 400,000 fine on a hospital for two violations of the EU General Data Protection Regulation.
The CNPD found the Barreiro Hospital had granted access to patient data to too many users of the hospitals patient management system. There were 985 users registered for doctor-level access, even though there were only 296 physicians working at the hospital in 2018. The DPA applied a 300,000 fine for this failure to respect patient confidentiality and to limit access to patient data. The CNPD imposed the second fine of 100,000 for the hospitals inability to ensure data security and data integrity in the system.
Read more about this news here.
Provided by: Access Now

First UK GDPR enforcement action is against Canadian firm with apparently no EU presence

17TH DECEMBER 2018 BY FRANK FINE IN NEWS

On 24 October 2018, the UK data protection enforcement body, the Information Commissioners Office (ICO), issued an Enforcement Notice against Canadian data services firm, AggregateI Q (AIQ). This was the first Enforcement Notice issued by the ICO under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The Notice specifies several breaches of the GDPR and gives AIQ 30 days to put itself into compliance or face a fine of 20 million or 4% of global group turnover, whichever is greater.
AIQs breaches of the GDPR relate to its use of personal data of UK individuals in connection with its business of providing data services to political organisations. Specifically, AIQ used this data to target individuals with political advertising on social media.
The specific GDPR breaches were as follows:
1 .AIQ breached Articles 5(1)(a)-(c) and Article 6 by processing personal data in a way that the data subjects were not aware of, for purposes which they would not have expected, and without a lawful basis for that processing. Moreover, the processing was incompatible with the purposes for which the data was originally collected.
2 .AIQ also breached Article 14 in that it failed to provide data subjects with the information set out in Articles 14(1) and (2), and none of the exceptions set out in Article 14(5) apply. Article 14 deals with the situation in which a company obtains the personal data from one or more third parties rather than from the data subjects directly. If Article 14 applies, the controller of the data must communicate to the data subject, among other things, the category of the data collected, the purpose(s) of the data processing, and its legal basis.
3 . Although it is not alleged in the Enforcement Notice, AIQ was also probably in breach of Article 27 in that non-EU companies that process the personal data of EU residents must designate an EU representative, which is obviously intended to provide regulators with an easy means of imposing jurisdiction. The failure to comply with Article 27 alone can result in a fine of 10 million or 2% of a companys global group turnover, whichever is higher.
The GDPR provides detailed guidance to companies on how the collection of personal data may be legally justified and the steps that must be taken with regard to the privacy of the data and the disclosures and/or authorizations that must be made to, or obtained from, the individuals affected. This is a complex exercise that should normally require the assistance of outside legal counsel. AIQ was either ignorant of how GDPR may affect its business or, what is more likely in view of the wide publicity GDPR has generated around the world, totally indifferent to its GDPR legal obligations.
The GDPR breaches by AIQ are so serious and wide ranging that it will be nearly impossible for it to fully comply with the Enforcement Notice within 30 days. It should be kept in mind that AIQ must carry out its compliance steps with regard to all UK individuals affected (i.e. with regard to all those in the UK whose data was collected). If AIQs measures are only piecemeal, the ICO will probably deem AIQ to be non-compliant.
If AIQ fails to comply with its GDPR obligations within 30 days, and a fine is imposed, the fine may be enforced in a UK court. If AIQ fails to make a court appearance and a default judgment is entered, AIQ may well have to defend itself in an action to enforce a foreign judgment. Moreover, with a UK judgment entered, AIQ may be effectively barred from establishing itself within the EU for fear of its EU assets being subject to a seizure action for the collection of the fine.
The situation for Chinese companies could not be clearer. Even those not established in the EU could face the sort of risks identified above. Those Chinese companies taking a relaxed position or preferring to see how things develop before they take GDPR compliance measures could find themselves unpleasantly surprised. Keep in mind that AIQ is a small consultancy, but its business depends on assembling a massive database of personal data.
Now, imagine how much personal data a large Chinese manufacturer of consumer goods or electronic products, a Chinese airline or hotel chain, or a Chinese internet selling platform is able to collect from/on EU consumers, and how much time it would need to comply with the GDPR. A 30-day window would be laughable. And it should be considered that the GDPR did not require the ICO to provide a 30-day windowthat was the ICOs decision, or if you prefer, English hospitality.

 

Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance

Posted by ert on December 21, 2018, at 16:06:53

In reply to Re: Most recent five suggestions for more compliance, posted by ert on December 21, 2018, at 4:53:04

one drawback with telegram is that there could be a bit less response because here it has 16 posts * 30 days = approx. 500 posts per month. to catch all posts someone has to jump back a month and the scroll through all postings until the present.

but the telegram also has advantages, because when someone is found who has the same disorder or takes the same drug it can be done private chats or if desired it can be called someone.

the psycho-babble that is originally based on the code by Matt Wright requires fairly little bandwidth but telegram also is efficient, whereas other software could require more. That problem however is less prevalent since almost all people do have a bandwidth of at least 128 kbps/s.

nevertheless, this website with the present policy in the faq's was and is currently illegal and must be compliant in the future.

for me it seems that the psycho babble has been to a great extent an ego project.


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.