![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 25 of 69. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Nickengland on July 18, 2005, at 15:40:25
so / used2be / ? ...and what was it then / perhaps another one before that?
Why on earth would someone spit so much hatred at Dr Bob for creating a forum where people can chat? Wouldn't be because Scientology is against psychiatry like I mentioned earlier..Oh no of course not. I mean people can post about creative writing, books, healthy living habits...but its the psychiatric medications part you hate right...and the psychiatrist itself.
From reading your posts so, you've made it quite clear your only real interest here is to exact revenge on Dr Bob...
My guessing is this...you probably joined a long long time ago and slowly began to recieve some PBC's (you didnt like that) Then I bet you got blocked - and I bet you really didnt like that.
So you got another name, came back, probably got blocked all over again.
Used2be - as in you used to be someone else on here.
Then used2b - that got blocked.
You decided to say to that "so"
Possibly 3 or 4 names.
My guessing is, when you got blocked, you really didn't like the last thing that was posted to, by the bloker, being Dr Bob and at the end of his message, doesnt it say something along the lines of you can check the FAQ's for how to deal with civility..hmmm
This is what I notice, in every group there are trouble makers - this is a fact. The main people who cause trouble with this site - post mostly at Administration...because this is where they can reach Dr Bob - the person who blocked them. This is the core, or the operation of the site. More importantly, when someone has obviously been pretty wound up becasue they have been blocked by Dr Bob...what a clever way to get your revenge...
Make a new name, come back and start to wind up the person who wound you up in the first place.
Cleverly done..or sadly not so. Wasted intelligence "so"
How old are you?..are you male or female? Is there not more to life exacting revenge just because you was blocked from an internet forum?
Posted by so on July 18, 2005, at 15:53:26
In reply to OMG The Revenge!, posted by Nickengland on July 18, 2005, at 15:40:25
> Why on earth would someone spit so much hatred at Dr Bob for creating a forum where people can chat?I'm just tossing back the live grenade he tossed in my crib. He is the hatemonger.
> Wouldn't be because Scientology is against psychiatry like I mentioned earlier..Oh no of course not.
Yes of course not. I don't oppose psyhciatry becuase Scientology says to.I sympathize with scientologists because they recognize the danger of mind-control masked as pychiatry.
>I mean people can post about creative writing, books, healthy living habits...but its the psychiatric medications part you hate right...and the psychiatrist itself.
It is the manipulation of minds for corporate power by an elite cabal that I war against.>
> From reading your posts so, you've made it quite clear your only real interest here is to exact revenge on Dr Bob...I've made it clear I intend to expose Robert Hsiung as the malicious bigot he knows himself to be.
> How old are you?..are you male or female? Is there not more to life exacting revenge just because you was blocked from an internet forum?
None of your business. Attempting to identify me comprises an invasion of my privacy. Don't take another step in that direction.
Posted by Nickengland on July 18, 2005, at 16:35:33
In reply to Re: exposure of a malicious religious bigot » Nickengland, posted by so on July 18, 2005, at 15:53:26
>None of your business. Attempting to identify me comprises an invasion of my privacy. Don't take another step in that direction.
Fair comment. You speak of soilders and a wars. Do you expect to do this through black text on a web page? You will need to expose youself with full force with regards to the issues your speaking about - before it was about civiliy within the administration of an internet forum...
The ideas and moods are becoming quite a big shift...your exposing something else here.
>I sympathize with scientologists because they recognize the danger of mind-control masked as pychiatry.
I thought you was a Scientologist?..this suggest you agree with "their" views.
If you are serious about the things you are talking about then, "exposure" is something you will have to consider stronger about doing in the future. By being a poster named "so" who cannot even be mailed, you are very limited.
Posted by so on July 18, 2005, at 16:44:36
In reply to Exposure, posted by Nickengland on July 18, 2005, at 16:35:33
> >None of your business. Attempting to identify me comprises an invasion of my privacy. Don't take another step in that direction.
>
> Fair comment. You speak of soilders and a wars. Do you expect to do this through black text on a web page?I have done this at times very effectively through electronic dialogue that stands on its own merit with no reference to my personal authority. I encourage people to trust reason and not authority.
>You will need to expose youself with full force with regards to the issues your speaking about - before it was about civiliy within the administration of an internet forum...
It always has been about the inconsistent administration of capricious rules to enforce the covert will of a ill-equipped psychiatrist who uses a group to satisfy his personal needs while claiming to be and convincing others that he is a caregiver.
Experience has taught me well about the value of cover and concealment, and how to use them to control a rhetorical field of fire.
>
> The ideas and moods are becoming quite a big shift...your exposing something else here.
> >I sympathize with scientologists because they recognize the danger of mind-control masked as pychiatry.
>
> I thought you was a Scientologist?..this suggest you agree with "their" views.I made one statement -- "I am called creepy because of my religion."
Whether I call myself a Scientologist or others call me that is not your concern. What aspects of the faith I embrace are your concern and among Scientologists understood to be not their concern, as long as I don't disrupt the faith practices of others.
> If you are serious about the things you are talking about then, "exposure" is something you will have to consider stronger about doing in the future. By being a poster named "so" who cannot even be mailed, you are very limited.
I'm well aware of the limits and reach that define my scope.
Posted by Nickengland on July 18, 2005, at 18:05:13
In reply to Re: Exposure of a malicious practitioner » Nickengland, posted by so on July 18, 2005, at 16:44:36
>I'm well aware of the limits and reach that define my scope.
On the return of Dr Bob, the inevitable will happen and you will be most probably blocked. How many weeks do you think this will be for?
Will you then be returning?...If so, upon your return, you have shown that your intentions to completely win your war, would be for Dr Bob to lose his medical licence and for this site to shut down (if i've read right through your other posts)
Do you think this is within your limits as a poster here?...how long till you could make this happen, next month, next year?
Posted by Dinah on July 18, 2005, at 18:27:50
In reply to Re: exposure of a malicious religious bigot » Nickengland, posted by so on July 18, 2005, at 15:53:26
> He is the hatemonger.
>Dinah here, acting as deputy to Dr. Bob.
Please don't post anything that could lead others to feel accused or put down.
If you have any questions about deputy actions, they will be reviewed by Dr. Bob and you can feel free to email him.
Posted by pinkeye on July 18, 2005, at 18:39:29
In reply to Please be civil » so, posted by Dinah on July 18, 2005, at 18:27:50
Posted by gardenergirl on July 18, 2005, at 18:41:08
In reply to Re: Please be civil -JUST PLEASE BE CIVIL????? (nm) » Dinah, posted by pinkeye on July 18, 2005, at 18:39:29
Posted by crushedout on July 18, 2005, at 18:41:58
In reply to Re: Please be civil -JUST PLEASE BE CIVIL????? (nm) » Dinah, posted by pinkeye on July 18, 2005, at 18:39:29
she just got here, pinkeye. and i think she had a long day so be nice.((((((Dinah))))))
Posted by Dinah on July 18, 2005, at 18:42:49
In reply to Re: Exposure of a malicious practitioner » Nickengland, posted by so on July 18, 2005, at 16:44:36
Dinah here, acting as deputy for Dr. Bob.
You've been warned to be civil before, so this time I am blocking you. Dr. Bob will review and set the length of the block involved.
If you have any questions, please do not reregister under another name, but contact Dr. Bob through email.
Thanks,
Dinah
Posted by Dinah on July 18, 2005, at 18:44:38
In reply to Blocked » so, posted by Dinah on July 18, 2005, at 18:42:49
I revised the Please Be Civil to a block, after reviewing the rest of Admin posts today. I am aware that so has been blocked before, so I don't believe the action is unwarranted. But you are of course free to revise my decision, as always.
Posted by pinkeye on July 18, 2005, at 18:58:38
In reply to To Dr. Bob, From Dinah acting as Deputy, posted by Dinah on July 18, 2005, at 18:44:38
Posted by Dinah on July 18, 2005, at 19:00:10
In reply to IS THERE ANY DOUBT IN ANYONE's MIND?? (nm) » Dinah, posted by pinkeye on July 18, 2005, at 18:58:38
Posted by pinkeye on July 18, 2005, at 19:06:32
In reply to Pinkeye, I like to explain my actions as deputy (nm), posted by Dinah on July 18, 2005, at 19:00:10
Posted by stresser on July 21, 2005, at 19:09:07
In reply to Re: Exposure of a malicious practitioner » Nickengland, posted by so on July 18, 2005, at 16:44:36
Just following this thread a bit, and quite interested I must say. I have never popped in and read anything on this board. It does raise my blood pressure, and I start thinking up many questions I would like to ask SO. When did you get your Medical Degree/PH Degree? Where did you attend college, and where did you go to graduate school? I would love to know how you scored on your GMAT. I assume you scored in the top 95%. You seem to know so much about psychiatry and psychology, you must be very successful in you own practice. Are you a psychologist? What degrees do you hold as well? -L
Posted by Nickengland on July 22, 2005, at 5:08:56
In reply to Blocked » so, posted by Dinah on July 18, 2005, at 18:42:49
>Dr. Bob will review and set the length of the block involved
After all what happened, i'm really interested to know how long this will be for?!
Is it possible he/she has been blocked permernantly?
Kind regards
Nick
Posted by Dinah on July 22, 2005, at 5:18:30
In reply to Re: Blocked » Dinah, posted by Nickengland on July 22, 2005, at 5:08:56
The cap is currently at a year. If the year long block is violated, he starts it over at a year.
It's my opinion that Dr. Bob is way too lenient sometimes.
But that's just me.
Posted by Dr. Bob on July 22, 2005, at 16:37:00
In reply to OMG The Revenge!, posted by Nickengland on July 18, 2005, at 15:40:25
> Cleverly done..or sadly not so. Wasted intelligence "so"
Please don't post anything that could lead others to feel accused or put down.
If you or others have questions about this or about posting policies in general, or are interested in alternative ways of expressing yourself, please see the FAQ:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#civil
Follow-ups regarding these issues, as well as replies to the above post, should of course themselves be civil.
Thanks,
Bob
Posted by Dr. Bob on July 22, 2005, at 16:40:02
In reply to Blocked » so, posted by Dinah on July 18, 2005, at 18:42:49
> Dr. Bob will review and set the length of the block involved.
The last time he was blocked it was for 2 weeks, so this time it's for 6.
Bob
Posted by Dinah on July 22, 2005, at 16:41:22
In reply to Re: the length of the block, posted by Dr. Bob on July 22, 2005, at 16:40:02
After being blocked this time? Does that add any time?
What about the emails after being blocked? Does that add any extra time?
If not, doesn't that pretty much free anyone to do anything after being blocked?
Posted by Dinah on July 22, 2005, at 16:43:39
In reply to What about coming back under another name » Dr. Bob, posted by Dinah on July 22, 2005, at 16:41:22
I deleted the post, but I kept a copy if you need it.
Posted by Nickengland on July 22, 2005, at 16:54:32
In reply to Re: please be civil » Nickengland, posted by Dr. Bob on July 22, 2005, at 16:37:00
Sorry about the uncivilness of that post in question Dr Bob.
Posted by Dinah on July 22, 2005, at 16:57:07
In reply to What about coming back under another name » Dr. Bob, posted by Dinah on July 22, 2005, at 16:41:22
If you see this first.
My calculations say that posting while blocked doubles the original block. Even if you ignore the emails, which seems poor recompense to your deputies.
I am outraged.
Posted by Racer on July 22, 2005, at 19:15:42
In reply to P.S. to Dr. Bob, posted by Dinah on July 22, 2005, at 16:43:39
> I deleted the post, but I kept a copy if you need it.
I have a copy of it, too. And, as the person at whom that post was directed, um, er, how shall I say this? I think intent in this case should be taken into account when deciding if the block should be extended...
Posted by Dinah on July 22, 2005, at 19:49:55
In reply to P. P.S. to Dr. Bob, posted by Racer on July 22, 2005, at 19:15:42
Serves me right for promoting patience so vigorously.
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.