Psycho-Babble Social Thread 592960

Shown: posts 2 to 26 of 81. Go back in thread:

 

For example

Posted by LegWarmers on December 28, 2005, at 23:47:33

In reply to Astrology, posted by LegWarmers on December 28, 2005, at 23:29:10

I have a health problem that they claim is for a differnet sign then mine! But, I fit my personality profile! I wonder if I should base my future on it?

 

My horoscope for today said

Posted by LegWarmers on December 29, 2005, at 0:22:47

In reply to Astrology, posted by LegWarmers on December 28, 2005, at 23:29:10

that noone would talk to me today ; )

 

Re: For example » LegWarmers

Posted by alexandra_k on December 29, 2005, at 0:46:51

In reply to For example, posted by LegWarmers on December 28, 2005, at 23:47:33

> I wonder if I should base my future on it?

i think astrology is even less reliable than psychiatry and i think you know what i think of their predictions...

 

Re: For example » alexandra_k

Posted by LegWarmers on December 29, 2005, at 1:30:43

In reply to Re: For example » LegWarmers, posted by alexandra_k on December 29, 2005, at 0:46:51

> > I wonder if I should base my future on it?
>
> i think astrology is even less reliable than psychiatry and i think you know what i think of their predictions...
>
>

: )

It would be so comforting to think that there was something to astrology

and my horoscope was wrong

 

Re: For example » LegWarmers

Posted by alexandra_k on December 29, 2005, at 3:06:47

In reply to Re: For example » alexandra_k, posted by LegWarmers on December 29, 2005, at 1:30:43

> It would be so comforting to think that there was something to astrology

why?

did you get a good one?

 

Re: For example » alexandra_k

Posted by LegWarmers on December 29, 2005, at 16:49:06

In reply to Re: For example » LegWarmers, posted by alexandra_k on December 29, 2005, at 3:06:47

> > It would be so comforting to think that there was something to astrology
>
> why?
>
> did you get a good one?


I was hoping that maybe it explained some things, and it was a good one! But it won't come true
: (

 

Re: For example » LegWarmers

Posted by alexandra_k on December 29, 2005, at 17:15:34

In reply to Re: For example » alexandra_k, posted by LegWarmers on December 29, 2005, at 16:49:06

> But it won't come true

it might.
and if you believe in it...
even more chance

 

Re: For example » alexandra_k

Posted by LegWarmers on December 29, 2005, at 18:11:40

In reply to Re: For example » LegWarmers, posted by alexandra_k on December 29, 2005, at 17:15:34

> > But it won't come true
>
> it might.
> and if you believe in it...
> even more chance
>
>

yeah maybe : ), that reminds me of a kid believing in santa claus lol

 

Re: Astrology

Posted by Angela2 on December 29, 2005, at 18:50:32

In reply to Astrology, posted by LegWarmers on December 28, 2005, at 23:29:10

I don't think I believe in astrology. But I haven't studied it and I don't know a whole lot about it. But the idea of reading your horoscope to me is like reading a fortune cookie. It's bs.

 

Re: Astrology

Posted by crazy teresa on December 29, 2005, at 19:45:41

In reply to Re: Astrology, posted by Angela2 on December 29, 2005, at 18:50:32

I'm thinking it's like phone sex: There's somebody fat and cheesy at the other end of the line.

 

Re: Astrology » LegWarmers

Posted by Damos on December 29, 2005, at 19:51:25

In reply to Astrology, posted by LegWarmers on December 28, 2005, at 23:29:10

Hey :-)

One of my friends was really into it and from what I've seen a full chart done with all the correct information can actually be pretty accurate when done by someone who knows what they're doing. Their opinion of the stuff in the papers was "PFFT!"

One of the more interesting ones is:

http://www.cainer.com

 

Re: Astrology » Angela2

Posted by LegWarmers on December 29, 2005, at 20:40:19

In reply to Re: Astrology, posted by Angela2 on December 29, 2005, at 18:50:32

I have never ever believed in astrology, but then my horoscope fit a situation and I got hopeful ; )

 

Re: Astrology » crazy teresa

Posted by LegWarmers on December 29, 2005, at 20:41:55

In reply to Re: Astrology, posted by crazy teresa on December 29, 2005, at 19:45:41

LOL yeah I would never call but I meant the cheesy cosmo and book astrology, life suddenly felt really light and fluffy after I read mine

 

Re: Astrology » Damos

Posted by LegWarmers on December 29, 2005, at 20:44:48

In reply to Re: Astrology » LegWarmers, posted by Damos on December 29, 2005, at 19:51:25

Thanks for the site it looks cool. I may do a complete profile, Im not sure if I believe in this but they can be so on target its insane!

 

Re: Astrology » Damos

Posted by Angela2 on December 29, 2005, at 20:45:23

In reply to Re: Astrology » LegWarmers, posted by Damos on December 29, 2005, at 19:51:25

Yeah that guy looks like he knows what he's talking about. lol.

 

Re: Astrology

Posted by Phillipa on December 29, 2005, at 20:54:57

In reply to Re: Astrology » Damos, posted by Angela2 on December 29, 2005, at 20:45:23

It's how you read your horoscope that gives it any meaning if you believe in it. Fondly, Phillipa

 

Re: Astrology

Posted by alexandra_k on December 29, 2005, at 21:12:08

In reply to Re: Astrology, posted by Phillipa on December 29, 2005, at 20:54:57

the position of the planets and stars at your time of birth is supposed to determine future events and things about your nature / personality.

so librans are this kind of person:
and the next one is this...

but of course if it doesn't sound right then there are a variety of other influences and it all gets very complicated.

my question for astrology is:

how are the positions of the sun and moon and planets and stars relevant?

to either your nature

or events in your life

?

as a predictive tool it sucks...
and hence as an explanatory tool it doesn't fare any better.

there are a variety of different 'stances' one can take.

Daniel Dennett "The Intentional Stance" talks about

the astrological stance
the intentional (folk-psychological stance)
the cognitive (design stance)
the physical (physiological stance)

predictive (hence explanatory) leverage gets better the lower level the stance you adopt.

on the astrological stance...
it is thought that either the predictions are too general (hence too likely to be true beforehand) or are as likely to be true as false. and anomalies... are explained by the charts not having been done properly...

 

Re: Astrology

Posted by Angela2 on December 29, 2005, at 21:34:10

In reply to Re: Astrology » Angela2, posted by LegWarmers on December 29, 2005, at 20:40:19

I used to want to belileve in it but nothing has ever really happened where a horoscope would rpedict my future. ? There's probably some truth to it. But I don't think much.

 

Re: Astrology » Angela2

Posted by LegWarmers on December 29, 2005, at 22:02:46

In reply to Re: Astrology, posted by Angela2 on December 29, 2005, at 21:34:10

I really really really want to believe that its true. I like reading my horoscope, and I was hoping that there was some scientific support lol it could still be true ;)

 

Re: Astrology » alexandra_k

Posted by LegWarmers on December 29, 2005, at 22:07:39

In reply to Re: Astrology, posted by alexandra_k on December 29, 2005, at 21:12:08

> the position of the planets and stars at your time of birth is supposed to determine future events and things about your nature / personality.
>

That must have something to do with the fact that when there is a full moon weird things happpen to people :)

> so librans are this kind of person:
> and the next one is this...
>

It reminds me of those personality tests

 

I don't believe in it... sorry.. (nm)

Posted by spriggy on December 29, 2005, at 22:53:40

In reply to Re: Astrology » alexandra_k, posted by LegWarmers on December 29, 2005, at 22:07:39

 

Re: Astrology

Posted by Deneb on December 30, 2005, at 0:44:57

In reply to Re: Astrology » alexandra_k, posted by LegWarmers on December 29, 2005, at 22:07:39

> That must have something to do with the fact that when there is a full moon weird things happpen to people :)

I think it's more like some people act weird when they see a full moon. :-)

Deneb

 

Re: Astrology

Posted by LegWarmers on December 30, 2005, at 15:23:28

In reply to Re: Astrology, posted by Deneb on December 30, 2005, at 0:44:57

> > That must have something to do with the fact that when there is a full moon weird things happpen to people :)
>
> I think it's more like some people act weird when they see a full moon. :-)
>

But this is true. I know that for a fact people become strange when there is a full moon, we find out after that it is a full moon and say "ahh, It was all because it was a full moon!" ;)
me, gullible? nah

 

Re: Astrology » LegWarmers

Posted by crazy teresa on December 30, 2005, at 19:02:02

In reply to Re: Astrology, posted by LegWarmers on December 30, 2005, at 15:23:28

I can tell when there's a full moon without looking outside or at a calendar. My kids don't sleep well, niether do I. I get extremely agitated.

 

Re: Astrology

Posted by caraher on December 30, 2005, at 21:24:10

In reply to Re: Astrology » LegWarmers, posted by crazy teresa on December 30, 2005, at 19:02:02

Just because somebody goes through a lot of calculations doesn't mean what they're doing is remotely scientific. I'd wager that there is zero difference in the validity of astrology performed by an "expert" and an amateur. The only talent the former may have that the latter lacks is a silver tongue...

So you find it uncanny how well an astrologer seems to describe you? This is not so surprising at all; see, for instance,

http://skepdic.com/coldread.html

Try this challenge: ask an astrologer to *tell you* your sign based on your answers to whatever set of questions about your personality they consider relevant. It's easy to make up something to which people respond, "Hey, that's me!" but there's only a 1 in 12 chance of going from a personality description to a particular "sign."

My position on astrology is pretty well summarized here: http://skepdic.com/astrolgy.html


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.