Psycho-Babble Social Thread 289661

Shown: posts 17 to 41 of 50. Go back in thread:

 

London, England. (nm)

Posted by lookdownfish on December 15, 2003, at 11:22:42

In reply to where is everyone from geographically here?, posted by sarita0001 on December 14, 2003, at 12:58:59

 

pppsssttt larry...

Posted by justyourlaugh on December 15, 2003, at 12:20:28

In reply to Re: where is everyone from geographically here?, posted by Larry Hoover on December 14, 2003, at 15:16:36

me too...

 

amity..beside chief brody (nm)

Posted by justyourlaugh on December 15, 2003, at 12:23:31

In reply to London, England. (nm), posted by lookdownfish on December 15, 2003, at 11:22:42

 

texas!

Posted by miss amor on December 15, 2003, at 12:24:59

In reply to amity..beside chief brody (nm), posted by justyourlaugh on December 15, 2003, at 12:23:31

houston tx~

 

Re: pppsssttt larry... » justyourlaugh

Posted by Larry Hoover on December 15, 2003, at 13:29:11

In reply to pppsssttt larry..., posted by justyourlaugh on December 15, 2003, at 12:20:28

> me too...

I'm near Peterborough

 

Re: pppsssttt larry...

Posted by justyourlaugh on December 15, 2003, at 14:33:12

In reply to Re: pppsssttt larry... » justyourlaugh, posted by Larry Hoover on December 15, 2003, at 13:29:11

newmarket

 

Re: where is everyone from geographically here?

Posted by DeeJay on December 15, 2003, at 14:50:53

In reply to where is everyone from geographically here?, posted by sarita0001 on December 14, 2003, at 12:58:59

wow, am I the only Texan?

Deej

 

Re: Nope. The Lone Star state is well represented » DeeJay

Posted by zenhussy on December 15, 2003, at 15:27:30

In reply to Re: where is everyone from geographically here?, posted by DeeJay on December 15, 2003, at 14:50:53

http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/stats/20030411.html

Babble stats as of April 11th, 2003:

308 posters registered Texas as their state, or 7% of the responding posters.

CA has far more nuts! ; ) 582 to your 308. Take that TX!!

zenhussy

 

Re: Nope. The Lone Star state is well represented » zenhussy

Posted by shar on December 15, 2003, at 15:43:41

In reply to Re: Nope. The Lone Star state is well represented » DeeJay, posted by zenhussy on December 15, 2003, at 15:27:30

lol! We can tell that just by looking at yer governor!!

xoxo
Shar


> CA has far more nuts! ; ) 582 to your 308. Take that TX!!
>
> zenhussy

 

from: NH; live in: NC (nm)

Posted by yesac on December 15, 2003, at 15:44:08

In reply to where is everyone from geographically here?, posted by sarita0001 on December 14, 2003, at 12:58:59

 

Re: oh that was way too easy » shar

Posted by zenhussy on December 15, 2003, at 15:52:02

In reply to Re: Nope. The Lone Star state is well represented » zenhussy, posted by shar on December 15, 2003, at 15:43:41

>> CA has far more nuts! ; ) 582 to your 308. Take that TX!!
>> zenhussy

> lol! We can tell that just by looking at yer governor!!
> xoxo
> Shar

You've got a problem with our grope-a-nator? ; ) Damn I sort of forgot about our new governor and the easy pot shots (Yes, pun intended!!). Thanks for bringing me back into stinging reality! Ha ha ha.

zh


 

Who's Yesac? :-) Just kidding! (nm) » yesac

Posted by Susan J on December 15, 2003, at 15:53:59

In reply to from: NH; live in: NC (nm), posted by yesac on December 15, 2003, at 15:44:08

 

You know Exactly who I am!! (nm) » Susan J

Posted by yesac on December 15, 2003, at 16:10:19

In reply to Who's Yesac? :-) Just kidding! (nm) » yesac, posted by Susan J on December 15, 2003, at 15:53:59

 

Re: Nope. The Lone Star state is well represented

Posted by DeeJay on December 15, 2003, at 16:23:24

In reply to Re: Nope. The Lone Star state is well represented » DeeJay, posted by zenhussy on December 15, 2003, at 15:27:30

Okay, because I was starting to think you had to be Canadian to be crazy....now I know better...although, I think I did before...but you know......;-p

 

Re: Nice to see you again! (nm) » yesac

Posted by Dinah on December 15, 2003, at 17:58:43

In reply to You know Exactly who I am!! (nm) » Susan J, posted by yesac on December 15, 2003, at 16:10:19

 

Re: Nice to see you again!

Posted by 8 Miles on December 15, 2003, at 18:19:57

In reply to Re: Nice to see you again! (nm) » yesac, posted by Dinah on December 15, 2003, at 17:58:43

What was the question?

8

 

Northeastern U.S. (nm)

Posted by Emme on December 15, 2003, at 21:41:35

In reply to Re: Nice to see you again!, posted by 8 Miles on December 15, 2003, at 18:19:57

 

Re: where is everyone from geographically here? » DeeJay

Posted by noa on December 15, 2003, at 21:53:38

In reply to Re: where is everyone from geographically here?, posted by DeeJay on December 15, 2003, at 14:50:53

DJ, look 3 messages up from yours--"amor" is from Texas, too.

 

I like southern Ontario

Posted by Emme on December 15, 2003, at 21:53:52

In reply to where is everyone from geographically here?, posted by sarita0001 on December 14, 2003, at 12:58:59

I spent a couple of months doing field work for my master's degree in the Parry Sound area and also did a little work around Sudbury and Kingston. I liked the landscape and the rocks are really great! But there was the time when [an animal] got into my car at night at the campsite.....silly me.....left a window open.....clear route into the hatchback with all the food.....

 

San Francisco (please don't call it Frisco!) (nm)

Posted by sfmom on December 15, 2003, at 21:56:55

In reply to where is everyone from geographically here?, posted by sarita0001 on December 14, 2003, at 12:58:59

 

Re: oh that was way too easy » zenhussy

Posted by shar on December 15, 2003, at 22:45:52

In reply to Re: oh that was way too easy » shar, posted by zenhussy on December 15, 2003, at 15:52:02

you are right, I took the low road. Especially when (gulp) you could've said something about our current president (blush) who claims he came from (sssiiiggghhh) Texas. You took the high road.

(but really, I like to think of his exit as getting him out of our hair.)

S

 

Re: south cackalacky (nm)

Posted by Sabina on December 15, 2003, at 22:49:48

In reply to where is everyone from geographically here?, posted by sarita0001 on December 14, 2003, at 12:58:59

 

Re: south cackalacky » Sabina

Posted by sfmom on December 15, 2003, at 23:05:38

In reply to Re: south cackalacky (nm), posted by Sabina on December 15, 2003, at 22:49:48

No kidding? My family is from Sullivan's Island. It's my happy place. We have a joke in my family that we've all eaten so much sand there that we're magnetically drawn back. Wish I was there now. . .

 

Re: California/Canada....basically the same! » DeeJay

Posted by zenhussy on December 16, 2003, at 13:18:10

In reply to Re: Nope. The Lone Star state is well represented, posted by DeeJay on December 15, 2003, at 16:23:24

> Okay, because I was starting to think you had to be Canadian to be crazy....now I know better...although, I think I did before...but you know......;-p

LOL Too funny DeeJay! I represent both Canada and California so does that make me doubly nuts?! ;p

Shar's right though...y'all did stick Bush on us. That just isn't the move of sane people!! Ok, state wars are over. It's fun poking fun at the only other state with an ego as large as CA's. Take care.

zenhussy laughing on the coast

 

London UK (nm)

Posted by NikkiT2 on December 16, 2003, at 13:18:17

In reply to Re: south cackalacky » Sabina, posted by sfmom on December 15, 2003, at 23:05:38


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.