Psycho-Babble Social Thread 36910

Shown: posts 19 to 43 of 45. Go back in thread:

 

megalomaniacal ilium (nm)

Posted by noa on February 12, 2003, at 18:10:59

In reply to Does this count? sycophantic hypothyroidism, posted by noa on February 12, 2003, at 17:54:57

 

My (nm) is broken! (nm)

Posted by beardedlady on February 12, 2003, at 19:25:39

In reply to zarf is my favorite word! » Emme, posted by beardedlady on February 12, 2003, at 15:37:18

 

Sorry, Nikki: just because an Oxford University...

Posted by Jonathan on February 12, 2003, at 20:15:43

In reply to Another Pointless Game - Googlebashing!, posted by NikkiT2 on February 12, 2003, at 13:09:47

... examiner writes "oesophogus" doesn't make it the correct spelling.

http://www.psb.ox.ac.uk/ExamReports2002/BMTT2002.doc

> Only one I've come up with so far is lithium oesophogus *lol*

"Lithium oesophagus" gets 336 hits.

I'm just annoyed because my first try, "antidisestablishmentarianism persiflage", got two hits :(

 

Aarrgh! 2 hits again: 'peroxide bogomil' (nm)

Posted by Jonathan on February 12, 2003, at 20:22:38

In reply to Sorry, Nikki: just because an Oxford University..., posted by Jonathan on February 12, 2003, at 20:15:43

 

1 hit + 2 word-lists: effervescent dinoflagellate (nm)

Posted by Jonathan on February 12, 2003, at 20:39:47

In reply to Aarrgh! 2 hits again: 'peroxide bogomil' (nm), posted by Jonathan on February 12, 2003, at 20:22:38

 

subfusc optometrist (nm)

Posted by Jonathan on February 12, 2003, at 21:18:18

In reply to 1 hit + 2 word-lists: effervescent dinoflagellate (nm), posted by Jonathan on February 12, 2003, at 20:39:47

 

Re: bryozoa electrocuted

Posted by agencypanic on February 12, 2003, at 21:41:08

In reply to bryozoa electrocuted (nm), posted by Ted on February 12, 2003, at 15:08:15

Zizekian stimulus

 

retinopathy soliloquy (nm)

Posted by noa on February 13, 2003, at 19:34:30

In reply to Re: bryozoa electrocuted, posted by agencypanic on February 12, 2003, at 21:41:08

 

antidisestablishmentarianist glee (nm)

Posted by noa on February 13, 2003, at 19:40:39

In reply to retinopathy soliloquy (nm), posted by noa on February 13, 2003, at 19:34:30

 

sesquipedalian transgenderism (nm)

Posted by noa on February 13, 2003, at 19:45:16

In reply to antidisestablishmentarianist glee (nm), posted by noa on February 13, 2003, at 19:40:39

 

chillingly somnambulated (nm)

Posted by noa on February 13, 2003, at 19:55:37

In reply to sesquipedalian transgenderism (nm), posted by noa on February 13, 2003, at 19:45:16

 

Re: squicky halibut (nm)

Posted by Tabitha on February 14, 2003, at 4:04:38

In reply to chillingly somnambulated (nm), posted by noa on February 13, 2003, at 19:55:37

 

Re: masticated kiwifruit (nm)

Posted by Tabitha on February 14, 2003, at 4:17:14

In reply to Re: squicky halibut (nm), posted by Tabitha on February 14, 2003, at 4:04:38

 

Re: rhubarb chimneysweep (nm)

Posted by Tabitha on February 14, 2003, at 4:20:19

In reply to Re: masticated kiwifruit (nm), posted by Tabitha on February 14, 2003, at 4:17:14

 

Another Google game but

Posted by Phil on February 14, 2003, at 6:27:04

In reply to Re: rhubarb chimneysweep (nm), posted by Tabitha on February 14, 2003, at 4:20:19

not as good as this one.

http://www.googlism.com/

 

Re: Another Pointless Game - Googlebashing! » NikkiT2

Posted by Ilene on February 14, 2003, at 13:40:33

In reply to Another Pointless Game - Googlebashing!, posted by NikkiT2 on February 12, 2003, at 13:09:47

> Just discovered this game, and am quite addicted..
>
> basically, you have to go to www.google.com (works with any search engine, but you all have to use the same one, so Google in this case!) and enter any two words. The aim of the game is to get only 1 hit (1 website found).
>
> No "'s to be used, and no ,'s either.. and the words must be in the English Dictionary (we're using Mirriam Webster (www.m-w.com for our rules!) Oh, and the one hit must not be simply a list of words.
>
> So.. two words, one hit!! :o)
>
> Only one I've come up with so far is lithium oesophogus *lol*
>
> Good luck!
>
> Nikki


This is really, really bad for me. I love x-words and scrabble--I haven't had a good game of scrabble for years and years because my husband won't play w/ me. I trounced him royally even before we were married, and it was too much for his fragile male ego.

I never got into scrabble enough to memorize all the two-letter words in the world, but qa is useful. Al-queda is out, being a Proper Noun.

Hey, it's Friday! 2nd-best day for NYTimes x-word!

Got a zax, anyone?

--I.

 

Re: Another Google game but » Phil

Posted by noa on February 14, 2003, at 19:28:17

In reply to Another Google game but, posted by Phil on February 14, 2003, at 6:27:04

OK, what exactly is that? I put my name in and it came up with a lot of stuff, including this statement:

noa is probobly the least hostile spanker i know

 

serotonergic suppleness

Posted by noa on February 14, 2003, at 19:52:53

In reply to Re: Another Google game but » Phil, posted by noa on February 14, 2003, at 19:28:17

I find this game addictive! and I am blown away at how many sites have certain word combos!

 

googlebashing addict--yes, it works! (nm)

Posted by noa on February 14, 2003, at 19:55:15

In reply to serotonergic suppleness, posted by noa on February 14, 2003, at 19:52:53

 

postsynaptic goulash (nm)

Posted by noa on February 14, 2003, at 20:03:09

In reply to googlebashing addict--yes, it works! (nm), posted by noa on February 14, 2003, at 19:55:15

 

Re: Another Google game but

Posted by Phil on February 14, 2003, at 20:03:21

In reply to Re: Another Google game but » Phil, posted by noa on February 14, 2003, at 19:28:17

You key in your whole name and one line quotes about others with your name pop up. Some are funny, some aren't. It ain't the best...

 

Re: Another Google game but » Phil

Posted by Rach on February 14, 2003, at 23:47:04

In reply to Re: Another Google game but, posted by Phil on February 14, 2003, at 20:03:21

I'm pretty boring...

Sorry, Google doesn't know enough about (my full name) yet.

 

Re: Another Google game but » Rach

Posted by Tabitha on February 15, 2003, at 0:40:50

In reply to Re: Another Google game but » Phil, posted by Rach on February 14, 2003, at 23:47:04

> I'm pretty boring...
>
> Sorry, Google doesn't know enough about (my full name) yet.

I got the same thing. I feel so invisible.

( Reminds me of that movie where Steve Martin shouts out joyously "I'm somebody! The new phonebooks are here!" because he was listed in it. )

 

Re: Another Google game but

Posted by noa on February 15, 2003, at 15:48:31

In reply to Re: Another Google game but » Rach, posted by Tabitha on February 15, 2003, at 0:40:50

My real name draws nothing, but "noa" brought a ton of statements. Some are about the Israeli-American musician, Noa (Achinoam Nini). Others seem to be names of organizations, etc. An who knows who the "least hostile spanker" Noa really is!!

 

esophageal predestination

Posted by noa on February 15, 2003, at 15:54:22

In reply to Re: Another Google game but » Rach, posted by Tabitha on February 15, 2003, at 0:40:50

BTW, the "googlebashing addict" was a pair that came up with only one site. But I also discovered that there is a way to cheat at this game. I promise, I haven't used it yet. But maybe you have noticed that sometimes, one of the sites that comes up is named something like, "wierdest things searched for on google". Therein lies the cheat sheet.


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.