Psycho-Babble Psychology Thread 368717

Shown: posts 40 to 64 of 89. Go back in thread:

 

Re: Dinah, we've come full circle » AuntieMel

Posted by Dinah on July 23, 2004, at 15:47:08

In reply to Re: Dinah, we've come full circle, posted by AuntieMel on July 23, 2004, at 14:05:30

It remains to be seen if my behavior has any merit whatsoever to it. Or if I am complicit in hurting my friends. There is no honor in helping people hurt others.

 

Re: Dinah, we've come full circle » Dinah

Posted by AuntieMel on July 23, 2004, at 15:53:40

In reply to Re: Dinah, we've come full circle » AuntieMel, posted by Dinah on July 23, 2004, at 15:47:08

It has merit in it because you believed (and I still do) that it was the right, fair thing to do. That is *not* something you should ever feel sorry for.

You're doing a mitzvah.

 

Re: Now, fires

Posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 15:59:41

In reply to Re: Now, fires, posted by Dinah on July 23, 2004, at 14:32:14

So many questions! I have time for only a few. Hopefully my point will answer more than one.

There are so many types of T and so many types of Ts. I was wondering what type she is in training for? Or, do they now train to cover all the types of Ts?

I got all of these types from just *one* web site:
http://www.pip.com.au/~chenderson/types.htm
•Art therapy
•Cognitive behavioural therapy
•Existential therapy
•Gestalt
•Hakomi
•Jungian
•Neurolinguistic programming (NLP)
•Process Work
•Psychoanalysis
•Psychodrama
•Rebirthing
•Shamanism
•Somatic therapy
•Voice dialogue

The following link is to Amazon.com, Crazy Therapies(Singe & Lalich):

http://tinyurl.com/58umf

Scroll down page to "Editorial Reviews"

Thanks

 

Re: Now, fires » fires

Posted by Dinah on July 23, 2004, at 16:03:31

In reply to Re: Now, fires, posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 15:59:41

Well, now. You've come up with a better way you could have asked that question. You could have said that there are many types of therapy and listed them. You could have asked GG what sort she was training for.

All that could have been done without saying:

"I know some schools hand out degrees for money, and eventually get caught for being unaccredited."

So my specific question is why did you add that sentence in a post directed at the training program of a poster? How did you mean *that sentence* and why was it necessary to include it. Aren't there other, more charitable, ways to find out what you were interested in finding out?

 

Re: Ah, the tyranny of the Should... » fires

Posted by AuntieMel on July 23, 2004, at 16:03:32

In reply to Re: Ah, the tyranny of the Should..., posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 15:16:55


Please don't let your admittedly horrid experiences taint your opinion of someone who genuinely wants to help people. One of the kindest people around.

Peace,

Mel

 

My credentials » fires

Posted by gardenergirl on July 23, 2004, at 16:47:10

In reply to Re: Ah, the tyranny of the Should..., posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 11:42:30

>
> >>I had a client<<???
>
> Care to share your credentials? State lic. #?
>
> Thanks

Why fires, thank you so much for showing an interest in my training. I have a MA in clinical psychology from an accredited university which I earned after completing my second year in the doctoral program. I have finished my fourth year of course work in the PsyD (doctor of psychology, a more clinically applied program than PhD programs) program in clinical psychology and next will be doing my internship and my dissertation. My specialty is geropsychology, but my training has also included working with college students and adults in my community.

The client I referred to was one I worked with while under the supervision of a licensed psychologist. I have never used the term psychologist nor made any claim to licensure, as in my state it requires a significant number of hours of supervised post-doctoral work before you can sit for licensure. This usually takes between one to two years after the degree is awarded to accumlate enough supervised clinical contact hours.

I'm quite proud that my university gained accreditation from APA for its clinical psychology doctoral program for the maximum number of years before renewal. I believe that speaks for itself as to the quality of my training, as APA accreditation is a rigorous process.

Does that answer your questions, dear?

gg
>
>

 

Re: My credentials

Posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 16:53:22

In reply to My credentials » fires, posted by gardenergirl on July 23, 2004, at 16:47:10

Please don't call me Dear or Shirley.:)

Actually, all your info. doesn't quite answer my question. What type(s) of therapy are you training in? Which of the several hundreds of types of PT are you receiving training in?

I believe I have asked the Q. as clearly as possible. Also, do you have to undergo a psych. exam to prove fitness to be a T?

bye

 

We don't read Fires

Posted by pinkeye on July 23, 2004, at 17:27:57

In reply to Re: My credentials, posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 16:53:22

Or anybody else who posts such obviously hurting messages. What is your problem mister fires?
If you can't help, atleast don't hurt others.

I think all of us should boycott reading his posts or replying.

 

Re: We don't read Fires » pinkeye

Posted by Larry Hoover on July 23, 2004, at 17:38:00

In reply to We don't read Fires, posted by pinkeye on July 23, 2004, at 17:27:57

> Or anybody else who posts such obviously hurting messages. What is your problem mister fires?
> If you can't help, atleast don't hurt others.
>
> I think all of us should boycott reading his posts or replying.

Probably a good idea. But fires didn't answer the question. I think XX chromosomes. Maybe XXX.

Lar

 

Re: My credentials

Posted by gardenergirl on July 23, 2004, at 17:42:54

In reply to Re: My credentials, posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 16:53:22

> Please don't call me Dear or Shirley.:)

Sorry snookums, just a habit of mine.

> Actually, all your info. doesn't quite answer my question. What type(s) of therapy are you training in? Which of the several hundreds of types of PT are you receiving training in?

My program is in clinical psychology. It is heavily influenced by CBT-oriented faculty, but we are taught a broad range of therapy orientations as per APA requirements. The broad categories of psychotherapy include behavioral, cognitive-behavioral, psychodynamic, humanistic, existential, and integrative. My program focuses mostly on CBT and psychodynamic orientations. Training in specific models comes during field work and is usually influenced by one's supervisor. My own preference is for self psychology work and I am most influenced by the theories of Kohut, Klein, and Erikson. Specific models I have been trained in during practicums include internal systems theory, DBT, CBT, BT, Kohut, Gestalt, Systems theory, Family systems theory, and Process-Experiential.

I am not aware of any program that requires a psych. eval in order to begin work. Training for psychoanalysts, however, which is undertaken after the doctorate, requres one to undergo an analysis first. Some programs require that students undergo psychotherapy as part of their training. While mine does not, it is strongly encouraged, and I have found my own therapy to be an invaluable learning experience as well as a facilitator of personal growth.

I'm curious...did you have to undergo some kind of fitness eval before you were able to work in your profession or occupation?

Regards,
gg

 

Thanks to Dinah, PC, and Auntie Mel

Posted by gardenergirl on July 23, 2004, at 17:44:39

In reply to Re: We don't read Fires » pinkeye, posted by Larry Hoover on July 23, 2004, at 17:38:00

Thanks to you all and to anyone I missed for jumping in for me until I could answer the question myself. And hugs and thanks for your kind words as well. I am humbled.

gg

 

Re: My credentials » gardenergirl

Posted by Larry Hoover on July 23, 2004, at 17:49:37

In reply to Re: My credentials, posted by gardenergirl on July 23, 2004, at 17:42:54

> My program is in clinical psychology. It is heavily influenced by CBT-oriented faculty, but we are taught a broad range of therapy orientations as per APA requirements. The broad categories of psychotherapy include behavioral, cognitive-behavioral, psychodynamic, humanistic, existential, and integrative. My program focuses mostly on CBT and psychodynamic orientations. Training in specific models comes during field work and is usually influenced by one's supervisor. My own preference is for self psychology work and I am most influenced by the theories of Kohut, Klein, and Erikson. Specific models I have been trained in during practicums include internal systems theory, DBT, CBT, BT, Kohut, Gestalt, Systems theory, Family systems theory, and Process-Experiential.

Oh, gg, I just love when a gal talks all geeky. <swoon>

 

*******TROLL ALERT********

Posted by shadows721 on July 23, 2004, at 18:00:09

In reply to Re: My credentials, posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 16:53:22

The ONLY way to deal with trolls is to LIMIT your reaction to reminding others NOT to respond to trolls.

 

Re: We don't read Fires

Posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 18:16:33

In reply to We don't read Fires, posted by pinkeye on July 23, 2004, at 17:27:57

> Or anybody else who posts such obviously hurting messages. What is your problem mister fires?
> If you can't help, atleast don't hurt others.
>
> I think all of us should boycott reading his posts or replying.

I haven't a clue what you are talking about. Who am I hurting and how? Who am I supposed to help?

bye

 

Re: We don't read Fires

Posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 18:17:52

In reply to Re: We don't read Fires » pinkeye, posted by Larry Hoover on July 23, 2004, at 17:38:00

Ad hominem attack ignored.

 

Re: We don't read Fires » fires

Posted by partlycloudy on July 23, 2004, at 18:21:36

In reply to Re: We don't read Fires, posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 18:17:52

Where's that darn dictionary when you need it? I'm afraid they didn't teach Latin when I went to school.

 

Re: We don't read Fires » fires

Posted by partlycloudy on July 23, 2004, at 18:22:48

In reply to Re: We don't read Fires, posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 18:17:52

P.S. if you check the box that says "add name of previous poster", we'll at least know who you are addressing. Just a suggestion.

 

Re: My credentials

Posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 18:23:51

In reply to Re: My credentials, posted by gardenergirl on July 23, 2004, at 17:42:54

> > Please don't call me Dear or Shirley.:)
>
> Sorry snookums, just a habit of mine.
>
> > Actually, all your info. doesn't quite answer my question. What type(s) of therapy are you training in? Which of the several hundreds of types of PT are you receiving training in?
>
> My program is in clinical psychology. It is heavily influenced by CBT-oriented faculty, but we are taught a broad range of therapy orientations as per APA requirements. The broad categories of psychotherapy include behavioral, cognitive-behavioral, psychodynamic, humanistic, existential, and integrative. My program focuses mostly on CBT and psychodynamic orientations. Training in specific models comes during field work and is usually influenced by one's supervisor. My own preference is for self psychology work and I am most influenced by the theories of Kohut, Klein, and Erikson. Specific models I have been trained in during practicums include internal systems theory, DBT, CBT, BT, Kohut, Gestalt, Systems theory, Family systems theory, and Process-Experiential.
>
> I am not aware of any program that requires a psych. eval in order to begin work. Training for psychoanalysts, however, which is undertaken after the doctorate, requres one to undergo an analysis first. Some programs require that students undergo psychotherapy as part of their training. While mine does not, it is strongly encouraged, and I have found my own therapy to be an invaluable learning experience as well as a facilitator of personal growth.
>
> I'm curious...did you have to undergo some kind of fitness eval before you were able to work in your profession or occupation?
>
> Regards,
> gg

Please don't call me snookums. I had a T who is now Pres. of some local Eriksonian Hypnosis Society, or some such .org.

Yes, I did have to undergo a fitness exam for a job, and I had to be fingerprinted.

 

Re: My credentials » fires

Posted by partlycloudy on July 23, 2004, at 18:27:41

In reply to Re: My credentials, posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 18:23:51

Endearments are customary on this board. Sir.

 

Re: We don't read Fires

Posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 18:32:03

In reply to Re: We don't read Fires » fires, posted by partlycloudy on July 23, 2004, at 18:22:48

OK. Only when I click on "go to form" I can scroll down and see the person and text of who/what I'm responding to.:)

 

Re: My credentials

Posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 18:35:36

In reply to Re: My credentials » fires, posted by partlycloudy on July 23, 2004, at 18:27:41

Endearments? Please don't call me Sir. OK, Surely?

 

Re: We don't read Fires » fires

Posted by partlycloudy on July 23, 2004, at 19:17:43

In reply to Re: We don't read Fires, posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 18:32:03

Yes, but WE have no idea who you are responding to. Might be why you think there are multiple names for someone you think is one person.

Just a guess.

 

Re: My credentials » fires

Posted by partlycloudy on July 23, 2004, at 19:18:45

In reply to Re: My credentials, posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 18:35:36

OK, you can be My Old Flame. And that, really, is a joke. I won't bother giving you a name, how's that? Just hey, you.

 

Re: We don't read Fires » partlycloudy

Posted by fires on July 23, 2004, at 20:34:27

In reply to Re: We don't read Fires » fires, posted by partlycloudy on July 23, 2004, at 19:17:43

> Yes, but WE have no idea who you are responding to. Might be why you think there are multiple names for someone you think is one person.
>
> Just a guess.

That doesn't have anything to do with why I think there may be multiple name posters.

This group is unlike any I have posted to before.Yahoo groups and **** Forums leave no doubt who is responding to who. No need to check special boxes. I didn't even realize that fact until now. I'm going to re-read the suspicious posts and then see if I want to post the info.

I'm sure you realize that the MPD folks here believe that the multiple names use is part of their illness. I don't buy it. Another link to why I don't:

http://www.psycom.net/mchugh.html

bye

 

Re: Miss Honeychurch

Posted by Dinah on July 23, 2004, at 21:02:53

In reply to Re: Matt DDS? Other CBT'ers? » Dinah, posted by Miss Honeychurch on July 23, 2004, at 12:09:17

My head has been spinning today as I'm still giving Provigil a try. I can't believe they use it for ADD! I stay awake fine on it but my attention span is that of a flea.

Anyway I wanted to apologize for not posting what I meant to post, which is that I am very very happy that CBT worked well for you. That's the most important thing about any therapy. :)


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Psychology | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.