![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 28 to 52 of 53. Go back in thread:
Posted by fayeroe on July 6, 2008, at 13:09:22
In reply to Re: Anyone Else Starting To Fear..F*+^ing Yeah! » fayeroe, posted by Sigismund on June 30, 2008, at 15:25:20
> Queensland is mostly coal and there's heaps of gas off WA.
>
> *****We can have an 'all-American themepark' here.****Unless Dolly Parton designs it, that oughta scare you straight!
Posted by karen_kay on July 6, 2008, at 13:09:22
In reply to Anyone Else Starting To Fear The Economy?, posted by Phillipa on June 29, 2008, at 12:33:07
hell yes! if i can't drive around to clear my thoughts, while puffing on a camel and drinking a $5. coffee, i wonder if life's worth it anymore...
we should echange goods for services, i think. if for nothing else, just to spice things up a bit. you have NO idea what kk'd do for a carton of camels, expensive coffee and plenty of gas money.
Posted by Phillipa on July 6, 2008, at 13:09:23
In reply to Re: Anyone Else Starting To Fear The Economy? » Phillipa, posted by karen_kay on June 30, 2008, at 19:54:22
KK does it consist of a pole, dim lights, and many males stuffing dollars somewhere? Kidding but seriously we have a serious problem. And trickle down is the key word to me. And yes docs less of them as the insurance companies do not pay the same as they used to to them and their malpractice rises daily. Also agree on too big houses. Unneccessary. They say Charlotte is doing the best of all the States with Real Estate. But the problem is those wanting to relocate here from other states can't sell their houses. People I see daily buying expensive things sure bet their credit cards are maxed out. They do say a lot of old money in Charlotte. But what do I Know nothing. Sigi I want to move to Australia and play with boxing kangaroos sure bet kk will come also and win the match. Love Phillipa
Posted by Sigismund on July 6, 2008, at 13:09:23
In reply to Re: Anyone Else Starting To Fear The Economy? » karen_kay, posted by Phillipa on June 30, 2008, at 20:59:19
There's a kangaroo or two (or perhaps it's they are wallabies) down in the valley here.
In Tasmania there are miniature ones called potaroos, maybe about the same size as a rabbit, and they live on moss.
I just went for a look for one and found this
http://www.news-tasmania.com/tarkine-images/tarkine-2s.jpg
They want to build a pulp mill there to use up the last of the forests. That is the bright side of the credit crunch....it does not look like they will get the money, even though they own the state government.
Posted by fayeroe on July 6, 2008, at 13:09:23
In reply to Re: Anyone Else Starting To Fear The Economy? » Phillipa, posted by Sigismund on June 30, 2008, at 22:57:28
Sorry that I am going to go off subject of the 'roos.....
Saying "pulp mill" reminded me of where I grew up and why I become ill when I go back and see the destruction that a large lumber whore has caused the area.Google southeastern Oklahoma and all of the brown that you will see will be "clear cuts"...The trees/vegetation are literally scraped off of the mountains, piled up and burned. Loblobby pines are planted for harvesting. The silt from the bulldozing goes downhill (just like something else) and fills the streams and lakes.
I grew up there and spoke to the legislature when the state forestry department wanted to allow the ethical lumber company to sell out to Weyerhauser. Obviously, even pointing out that the state of Oregon had run them off did no good.
Thar's money to be made in them thar hills....
Posted by 64Bowtie on July 6, 2008, at 13:09:23
In reply to Re: The Economy, et al » 64Bowtie, posted by Sigismund on June 30, 2008, at 3:12:55
Thanks for responding... Guess I sounded a little overstated while repeating the many predictions that I have seen and heard that also have at least a vague thread of plausibility... I didn't attempt to force anything... Trust me; the list is much longer but also disjoint, whereas this shortened list is sorta "right-now" and interdependent...
Rod
PS: In my list Bush/Cheney play "pivot-man......." as one common thread
Posted by 64Bowtie on July 6, 2008, at 13:09:23
In reply to Re: Anyone Else Starting To Fear The Economy? » Midnightblue, posted by Dinah on June 30, 2008, at 17:22:03
» Dinah » >>> Definitely no easy fix. If someone were to invent tomorrow an affordable and effective alternative to combustion engines, it would still take years and years to replace the existing vehicles. And the same with other sorts of oil consumers. Or to build mass transit systems even if they were safe, clean, and went where people need to go. It's a mess. >
Rod <<< What takes so long is mandated by corporate accountants/attorneys who know that government money is new-money to the bottom line and nearly free because its grant-money... Government has a long "gestation", so the biggest folks are able to survive till it arrives... This "gestation" period for grants takes on a persona of its own, as if demanding that grants take an enormous amount of time to fund...
Rod <<< We see in the news all this noise about the Nuclear waste not having a safe home... Well, first off, Nuclear waste isn't done being Nuclear yet, as evidenced by the heat it generates... A "not perfect" but still "mighty fine" solution would be to send the waste material out with a NASA space probe, if and only if it would somehow generate electricity, much needed in deep space, and leave those elaborate and complex solar arrays here for us to use...
Rod <<< In Scientific American about 6 years ago, there was an expose' of a (sub-critical) Nuclear battery that worked by converting heat from the infra red frequencies into electricity; virtually forever; again perfect for a space probe... 2 drawbacks are the tremendous weight contained in small amounts of the waste and protective containers, along with problems of handling unstable sub-critical materials until it gets into space and then the protection of distance takes over...
Rod <<< Ah, distance; let me bend your mind around this concept, only let it stay here on earth... The Russians have drilled down to a level of 42 miles looking for oil... Now, mind you, oil companies have been drilling down then sideways for many years, and many lawsuits and claims of theft by neighbors seem to prove its possible... No rocket-science required to figure that the Russians could drill down 1 mile then hundreds of miles sideways and deplete our ANWAR reserve without us killing a single reservation animal... And, the Gull Island oil field nearby ANWAR is four times as big and being kept (mostly) secret for future military contingencies...
Rod <<< The point is, we could drill down a mile and place the Nuclear battery full of waste material, allowing for whole cities to safely get cheap electricity, forever... Also, a very small amount could be used 1,000 feet down, safely powering a home site 24/7 forever... 1,000 feet is a 1,000 10th thickenesses; more than enough for radioctive safety, since waste is never more than 10 to the 8th Curie in intensity; 120 times deeper than necessary for extra safety... The trade off is drilling, casing and platform at the top is about $7,000... I'm positive because of a water well I facillitated on family property about 6 months ago cost just about that much...
Rod <<< Not to be outdone by current technology, about a hundred years ago, Tesla got in trouble for trying to harness lightening on a daily and continuous basis... He never quite figured out how to turn a house into some kind of antenna to collect positively charged "air", pass it through the appliances and entertainment equipment in the house, depositing it in the negatively charged earth... Now wouldn't that cause shortness of breath in the boardrooms of our biggest power companies;
******* FREE ELECTRICITY 24/7!!! *******
Posted by Sigismund on July 6, 2008, at 13:09:23
In reply to » Dinah » 'It's a mess.' (Doesn't have to be...) » Dinah, posted by 64Bowtie on July 1, 2008, at 13:15:52
This Australian works in the US and is building a solar power plant there.
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2007/s1837616.htm
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22408071-664,00.html
We have so much sun. Why would we want to make use of it?
Posted by kid47 on July 6, 2008, at 13:09:23
In reply to Solar power, posted by Sigismund on July 1, 2008, at 15:41:45
How 'bout geothermal energy? Infinite supply, fiscally feasible, no known enviromental impact......what's irksome is a lot of this stuff has been doable for quite some time. There has been a hydrogen fuel cell car since the 1940's. Capitalism at its worst.
Kid
Posted by Sigismund on July 6, 2008, at 13:09:24
In reply to Re: Solar power » Sigismund, posted by kid47 on July 1, 2008, at 17:32:28
Australia is full of geothermal too (along with coal! and uranium!).
There are hotrocks under or near Perth; the whole artesian basin is hot.Nothing like putting all your eggs in one petroleum basket, hey?
Now that global warming is a big issue and the price of oil is so high, it makes it a lot more painful to do the carbon tax on petrol/emmissions trading thing.
We spent the last 10 years doing culture wars.
Posted by Larry Hoover on July 6, 2008, at 13:10:45
In reply to Anyone Else Starting To Fear The Economy?, posted by Phillipa on June 29, 2008, at 12:33:07
I'm a little slow to enter in, eh? Better late than never.
I'm not too concerned about the economy, in general. For example, manufacturing output in the U.S. rose in May (last stats available), after four months of decline. The fall in the U.S. dollar against other world currencies has made American output cheaper. Exports are increasing steadily, improving the trade balance. Yes, consumer confidence is down, at the lowest it's been since ~1990, but consumer confidence hits a bottom *after* the economic recovery has already begun. It lags the performance of the economy itself.
Because many basic commodities are denominated in U.S. dollars, the U.S. is taking a double whammy. Relative to other major economies, the percentage increase in some commodities is the highest. But the American economy is still the leader in many high technology areas, and I can't see that changing any time soon. The economic pressures will simply force a faster pace of adaptation, and the next increment in high tech arising therefrom will push the U.S. back up again. I think that's already begun.
Yes, the stock market (DJIA) is down 20%, but I don't find that to be a relevant indicator of anything, other than it's a good time to buy. There's still a huge amount of cash (world-wide, I mean) chasing after investment opportunities, despite the credit crunch. When fear leaves the market, as it always does, consumer confidence will return again.
I feel for people who got stuck with houses and mortgages that they couldn't afford. But look at oil-dependent cities like Calgary or Houston. There are times when you can pick up a property at 10-20 cents on the dollar, but things always turn around. I remember when people were buying houses in Texas to tear down for the materials they were made up of, being cheaper than buying new construction materials. Not any more, they're not. People are way too resilient to stay mired for very long.
Lar
Posted by Larry Hoover on July 6, 2008, at 13:10:45
In reply to Re: Anyone Else Starting To Fear The Economy?, posted by Larry Hoover on July 6, 2008, at 10:29:08
I just thought of another way of saying what I'm trying to get across....
For *most* people, the economic decisious they're facing are lifestyle decisions, not survival decisions. Buying a more fuel-efficient vehicle, hanging out at the mall/restaurant meals less often, vacationing closer to home....Not about how to feed the family, or cope with having nowhere to shelter them. Being more sensible with credit, rather than outright bankruptcy. We still pay less for food, on a percentage of total income basis, than we did in the 1920's, the 1950's, the 1980's. We're just a little spoiled.
Lar
Posted by fayeroe on July 6, 2008, at 13:10:45
In reply to Re: Anyone Else Starting To Fear The Economy?, posted by Larry Hoover on July 6, 2008, at 10:45:39
> I just thought of another way of saying what I'm trying to get across....
>
> For *most* people, the economic decisious they're facing are lifestyle decisions, not survival decisions. Buying a more fuel-efficient vehicle, hanging out at the mall/restaurant meals less often, vacationing closer to home....Not about how to feed the family, or cope with having nowhere to shelter them. Being more sensible with credit, rather than outright bankruptcy. We still pay less for food, on a percentage of total income basis, than we did in the 1920's, the 1950's, the 1980's. We're just a little spoiled.
>
> LarFor your first post...... Yes, consumer confidence is down, at the lowest it's been since ~1990, but consumer confidence hits a bottom *after* the economic recovery has already begun. It lags the performance of the economy itself.
I beg to differ with you about consumer confidence hitting the bottom after the economic recovery has already begun. Texas is in trouble right now. I am too lazy to list everything that affects the consumer here (I live here, so am speaking from mine and my friends experiences) but it is serious now.
People can't afford health insurance, car insurance is way down...folks are only buying what the state requires, putting food on the table is really hard...I drove into the little mall where the food bank is, last week, and the line to the door went around a corner and out of the mall.....folks are driving ten year old cars, etc. etc.
I'd like to know where all of that confidence is right now, Larry.
There won't be an economic recovery anytime soon. You can talk about "floating money" and such.....well, it isn't floating around people here. All of that money only makes the rich richer and the poor, poorer.
We still pay less for food, on a percentage of total income basis, than we did in the 1920's, the 1950's, the 1980's. We're just a little spoiled.
Milk is $5 a gallon, eggs are $3 and rice is unbelievable expensive. I do not agree with you. I am much older than you and I do remember the 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s. A loaf of bread that I did pay $1.85 for is now $2.48.
I ain't buying into your ideas. :-) Pat
Posted by Phillipa on July 6, 2008, at 13:10:45
In reply to Re: Anyone Else Starting To Fear The Economy? » Larry Hoover, posted by fayeroe on July 6, 2008, at 11:25:58
I agree with fayroe as here in this neighborhood and consists of wealthy northerners who moved here to save money in their golden years. Discussions outside are based on the fact that we in a way are lucky as we can walk to grocery stores, pharmacies, and other stores. No vacations this year gas is too expensive. One vehicle sit in the drive as too expensive to drive. Even the good will is empty as folks are making do. Since we do ebay the trend is most sales are to Canada, Australia, Spain, And other European countries. I've had to give up my therapist as can't afford her and cant afford meds or seeing the doc as my other disc is slipped but my Disability is only 800 a month and I can't afford a doc. I never charged until now and had to charge shampoo how humiliating. My Daughter is a manager in training for a chain beauty store and she said daily they are turning away folks who are begging for parttime work with Masters Degress. Layoffs just heard 6000 laid off from Starbucks alone. And Charlotte is supposed to be in better shape than the rest of the US. But since people can't sell to move South finished houses sit empty. It is a serious situation here. They are saying old money in Charlotte is what is keeping it going. That's it. No jobs available even the medical field is cutting salaries and laying off and giving medical workers heavier patient loads not safe. Phillipa.
Posted by SLS on July 6, 2008, at 13:10:45
In reply to Re: Anyone Else Starting To Fear The Economy?, posted by Larry Hoover on July 6, 2008, at 10:45:39
I came to expect things to deteriorate once I heard the platform speech of a certain candidate for the 2000 U.S. presidential election. I could not have predicted, however, how his subsequent actions would affect the stability of the rest of the world, both politically and economically. The price of oil and gold are indicators of how global has been the meddlings of this one man. How very, very sad. As an American, I am embarrassed.
- Scott
Posted by fayeroe on July 6, 2008, at 13:10:45
In reply to Re: Anyone Else Starting To Fear The Economy? » Larry Hoover, posted by SLS on July 6, 2008, at 12:17:10
Posted by Larry Hoover on July 6, 2008, at 13:10:45
In reply to Re: Anyone Else Starting To Fear The Economy? » Larry Hoover, posted by fayeroe on July 6, 2008, at 11:25:58
> > I just thought of another way of saying what I'm trying to get across....
> >
> > For *most* people, the economic decisious they're facing are lifestyle decisions, not survival decisions. Buying a more fuel-efficient vehicle, hanging out at the mall/restaurant meals less often, vacationing closer to home....Not about how to feed the family, or cope with having nowhere to shelter them. Being more sensible with credit, rather than outright bankruptcy. We still pay less for food, on a percentage of total income basis, than we did in the 1920's, the 1950's, the 1980's. We're just a little spoiled.
> >
> > Lar
>
> For your first post...... Yes, consumer confidence is down, at the lowest it's been since ~1990, but consumer confidence hits a bottom *after* the economic recovery has already begun. It lags the performance of the economy itself.
>
> I beg to differ with you about consumer confidence hitting the bottom after the economic recovery has already begun. Texas is in trouble right now. I am too lazy to list everything that affects the consumer here (I live here, so am speaking from mine and my friends experiences) but it is serious now.I didn't make up my remark. I am speaking after viewing historical trend charts. Recession always officially ends before consumer confidence rebounds. The only issue that is hard to ascertain is if this is yet the bottom in consumer confidence. Hindsight will reveal that....
> People can't afford health insurance, car insurance is way down...folks are only buying what the state requires, putting food on the table is really hard...I drove into the little mall where the food bank is, last week, and the line to the door went around a corner and out of the mall.....folks are driving ten year old cars, etc. etc.
People living a marginal existence always bear the brunt of economic downturns. I've lived that one for many years. I am talking about statistical means, not marginal effects.
> I'd like to know where all of that confidence is right now, Larry.
I reiterate, confidence is at a low ebb. I am not worried, but that is my opinion. I have faith.
> There won't be an economic recovery anytime soon. You can talk about "floating money" and such.....well, it isn't floating around people here. All of that money only makes the rich richer and the poor, poorer.
I wasn't implying windfall economic inputs. In contrast to the Great Depression, unemployment is not a significant concern. Manufacturing output is increasing. Relatively more individuals are hurting, but the average is not. The economic data are not bleak
> We still pay less for food, on a percentage of total income basis, than we did in the 1920's, the 1950's, the 1980's. We're just a little spoiled.
>
> Milk is $5 a gallon, eggs are $3 and rice is unbelievable expensive. I do not agree with you. I am much older than you and I do remember the 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s. A loaf of bread that I did pay $1.85 for is now $2.48.Once again, I am not making up the numbers. In the 20's, the average family spent 1/3 of gross income on food. Nowadays, the average is less than 15%. Poorer people (in both eras), always paid more, proportionally.
I know it's tough for you (and others you see), and I'm not dismissing that. Local calculations (Ontario) put people into an impoverished class if >30% of gross income goes to shelter costs. I spent eight years with that expense at 70-110% of income. Trust me, I get it. Pensioners, for example, or anyone else on a fixed income, always get hurt the most by inflation....adjustments to income flow always being made after the fact, if they happen at all.
> I ain't buying into your ideas. :-) Pat
I trust the statistical analyses, which are based on averages.
Lar
Posted by fayeroe on July 6, 2008, at 13:10:46
In reply to Re: Anyone Else Starting To Fear The Economy? » fayeroe, posted by Larry Hoover on July 6, 2008, at 12:22:58
> > > I just thought of another way of saying what I'm trying to get across....
> > >
> > > For *most* people, the economic decisious they're facing are lifestyle decisions, not survival decisions. Buying a more fuel-efficient vehicle, hanging out at the mall/restaurant meals less often, vacationing closer to home....Not about how to feed the family, or cope with having nowhere to shelter them. Being more sensible with credit, rather than outright bankruptcy. We still pay less for food, on a percentage of total income basis, than we did in the 1920's, the 1950's, the 1980's. We're just a little spoiled.
> > >
> > > Lar
> >
> > For your first post...... Yes, consumer confidence is down, at the lowest it's been since ~1990, but consumer confidence hits a bottom *after* the economic recovery has already begun. It lags the performance of the economy itself.
> >
> > I beg to differ with you about consumer confidence hitting the bottom after the economic recovery has already begun. Texas is in trouble right now. I am too lazy to list everything that affects the consumer here (I live here, so am speaking from mine and my friends experiences) but it is serious now.
>
> I didn't make up my remark. I am speaking after viewing historical trend charts. Recession always officially ends before consumer confidence rebounds. The only issue that is hard to ascertain is if this is yet the bottom in consumer confidence. Hindsight will reveal that....Hindsight? How about some foresight here?
>
> > People can't afford health insurance, car insurance is way down...folks are only buying what the state requires, putting food on the table is really hard...I drove into the little mall where the food bank is, last week, and the line to the door went around a corner and out of the mall.....folks are driving ten year old cars, etc. etc.
>
> People living a marginal existence always bear the brunt of economic downturns. I've lived that one for many years. I am talking about statistical means, not marginal effects.If you're living a marginal existence, Larry, statistical means don't matter.
>
> > I'd like to know where all of that confidence is right now, Larry.
>
> I reiterate, confidence is at a low ebb. I am not worried, but that is my opinion. I have faith.
>
> > There won't be an economic recovery anytime soon. You can talk about "floating money" and such.....well, it isn't floating around people here. All of that money only makes the rich richer and the poor, poorer.
>
> I wasn't implying windfall economic inputs. In contrast to the Great Depression, unemployment is not a significant concern. Manufacturing output is increasing. Relatively more individuals are hurting, but the average is not. The economic data are not bleak
>
> > We still pay less for food, on a percentage of total income basis, than we did in the 1920's, the 1950's, the 1980's. We're just a little spoiled.
> >
> > Milk is $5 a gallon, eggs are $3 and rice is unbelievable expensive. I do not agree with you. I am much older than you and I do remember the 40s, 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s. A loaf of bread that I did pay $1.85 for is now $2.48.
>
> Once again, I am not making up the numbers. In the 20's, the average family spent 1/3 of gross income on food. Nowadays, the average is less than 15%. Poorer people (in both eras), always paid more, proportionally.
>
> I know it's tough for you (and others you see), and I'm not dismissing that. Local calculations (Ontario) put people into an impoverished class if >30% of gross income goes to shelter costs. I spent eight years with that expense at 70-110% of income. Trust me, I get it. Pensioners, for example, or anyone else on a fixed income, always get hurt the most by inflation....adjustments to income flow always being made after the fact, if they happen at all.
>
> > I ain't buying into your ideas. :-) Pat
>
> I trust the statistical analyses, which are based on averages.
>
> Lar
>I am not looking at it from your point of view.
The analyists have more time than I can spare right now. Pat
Posted by Chris O on July 6, 2008, at 13:50:11
In reply to The Economy, et al, posted by 64Bowtie on July 6, 2008, at 13:09:20
Bowtie:
Wow, been listening to a little Coast to Coast AM lately with George "the sky is falling" Noory? In all seriousness, I share your fears though. Seriously, I've remarked about that China thing for years to others. China does have its own version of exceptionalism (Confucianist), and people would do well to take it seriously. Anyway, I chuck most of my Coast to Coast worries up to my anxiety disorder. Let's hope so, at least.
Chris
> I see no way out... We are gonna see:
> 1. major devaluation of the dollar against other world currencies (like 50%)
> 2. martial law declared before the general election in November
> 3. sinking of 1 of our 2 aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf
> 4. the Pope is asassinated w/no replacement
> 5. Isreal gets fed up and attacks Siria and Iran
> 6. price of oil starts settling lower than today when the speculators become regulated
> 7. China demands title to the lands in the nine western states that secures the accumulated 4 trillion dollar deficit in our balance of payments, which are met with our stiffest resistance ever seen (they better "duck & cover")
> 8. Hillary Clinton does not become our 1st female President, but is elected in May of 2009 as our 2nd female President
> 9. Solar activity in 2011 eventually forces the survivors underground till 2016
>
> Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...........
Posted by fayeroe on July 6, 2008, at 16:10:35
In reply to Re: Anyone Else Starting To Fear The Economy? » fayeroe, posted by Larry Hoover on July 6, 2008, at 13:10:45
"The burden of the debt for every American citizen is $175,000 and growing every day. In an age where more and more Americans are carrying massive personal debt, we are borrowing on our future dangerously."
Here is a scary statistic for you, Larry.
Posted by Sigismund on July 6, 2008, at 18:29:38
In reply to Re: Anyone Else Starting To Fear The Economy? » Larry Hoover, posted by fayeroe on July 6, 2008, at 16:10:35
Gippsland is an area that includes power generation with brown coal. The people there are not especially prosperous. Because things have been left so late, we are in the position that our contribution to the cure for global warming (an emissions carbon credit scheme thingo) will make more expensive such things as fuel (and therefore everything) that ordinary people are already having trouble with. So there was a big swing against the government.
The Garnaut Report kinda said that as we let things go on without remedy, the options before us become much less palatable. I imagine this will be a general pattern worldwide.
I wonder if the people who think global warming is junk science will be first to be in favour of a scientific fix for the global climate....firing suphur into the stratosphere and so on.
Posted by Phillipa on July 6, 2008, at 20:01:42
In reply to The Gippsland By-election, posted by Sigismund on July 6, 2008, at 18:29:38
I've heard anywhere from two years to l0 years for things to improve any insight on this? This is word of mouth what the people I daily see believe. Phillipa
Posted by Sigismund on July 7, 2008, at 3:27:36
In reply to Re: The Gippsland By-election, posted by Phillipa on July 6, 2008, at 20:01:42
>I've heard anywhere from two years to l0 years for things to improve any insight on this?
No, PJ as I understand it, if we can do the right thing (cut carbon emissions) within 10 years things will just be bad.
If we don't (and I think that will be the case) the science seems to be saying that things will be much worse.
There's a lag of decades between successful policy changes and changes in the weather.
Posted by Sigismund on July 7, 2008, at 3:44:02
In reply to Re: The Gippsland By-election » Phillipa, posted by Sigismund on July 7, 2008, at 3:27:36
When the Arctic ice melts, the rate of change will increase (less sunlight reflected) and that will lead to more degradation of the Greenland Icecap, which will lead to rising sea levels.
That is one of the anxieties.
Posted by Phillipa on July 7, 2008, at 19:35:01
In reply to Re: The Gippsland By-election, posted by Sigismund on July 7, 2008, at 3:44:02
Hence all the erosions of beaches and flooding. Love PJ
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Politics | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.