![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 4 of 4. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by omega man on June 18, 2002, at 18:59:30
Does anyone know what I would be talking about when I say I don't think time exists as a past and future ?
From what I've seen everyone who is wired up Neuron heavy on the left side..always goes on about the previous..what happened before..going back and back..if allowed to..converging on whatever contexts seem relevant...like kiddo said dividing and subtracting....and neuron structure on the left side does converge to single points..
The opposite on the other side..people like me who are wired up that way are always looking forward expansively..unable to reference the previous..but very creative about routes for growth..
We are in essence seeing the structure of our neurons and playing them out in our perceptions...Normal human sense tells us this feels right without me pointing out what neurolgical slicing says..
I heard a theory that time does not exist..and I just could not make sense of that..but what I had figured out about left hemisphered people being pre-occupied with the previous and rights the future..gave me a clue to see what I could'nt understand in the equations...
The greatest of the wise..like Bhudda seemed to see the opposites in everything as did Einstein..and strangely enough einsteins brain on dissection revealed an abnormally fused bridge in the middle where the two hemispheres would split..he saw thru every oscilation swing of every argument ever put till he died..it was him who proposed time as elastic..
It was proposed recently by Julian Arbour that time exists in packets held in spaces...I'm pretty sure he meant galaxies..
There is only three galaxy types..mainly gasous unformed..a vortex(ours) and spherical..the most pre-dominant....The vortex galaxy splits all matter along an axis..creating a pull into opposite poles..like our earth has and spinning rings like saturn....
I thought about why we think a previous exists..because its written..usually ..our best example being tree rings...most time pieces do have this circular repitition too...
I think its absolutely fascinating that our brains create these perceptions of time..and we think its proven because its spun into histories..that appear to follow a line...but this is only because matter is being spun that way according to the structure of a vortex..which has this definite arrow through it...
If time is held in each galaxy in a unique way...and we still don't know the strucure of "this" universe then not only can we see that past to future is an earthbound reality....then we don't even know how one time pocket relates to another..My only hope of making sense of this is that the vortex is the middle ground of all states..and our perception is the average out of all of them..
Any ideas ?
Posted by ctrlalt n del on June 18, 2002, at 22:26:38
In reply to Non-existance of time, posted by omega man on June 18, 2002, at 18:59:30
You'll get no deep thinking from my brain tis happy in shallow jelly but...
Time eh , well I often think time doesn't exist (my theories are fluid and changable) our wee brains need Mr.Time to adhere to the activities , routine of this planet but in the mist of a mental illness gem I lose sense of time..time we percieve moves forward ...HA!
I believe some can break through reality's bonds and access all areas by the use of latent brain (visualisation exercises )---just takes time heheheha...then again I'm nuts and never wear a watch..dr eamer time traveller...PHD CTRL DEL
Posted by Shawn. T. on July 17, 2002, at 3:10:43
In reply to Non-existance of time, posted by omega man on June 18, 2002, at 18:59:30
Ok go with Kant's modification of Descartes's Cogito (I think, therefore I am). We experience everything through a wide variety of personal filters. (I'm throwing out the a priori notion.) Now our genius friend Einstein says time is relative. Couldn't you take that to mean that time is subjective? So if time is subjective, everyone has their own unique sense of time. If someone wants to believe that time doesn't exist as a past or future, then that is their reality. In my subjective reality, time is the fourth dimension. Actually space and time are the same thing (e.g. space-time). Space and time are radically intertwined. If you state that nothing existed in space a second ago, what were you sitting on? In my reality, I was sitting on a mess of atoms called a chair. I could get into uncertainty principle, but I'm a little too tired to think about it right now.
Shawn
Posted by onehandcoding on August 15, 2002, at 23:22:35
In reply to Re: Non-existance of time, posted by Shawn. T. on July 17, 2002, at 3:10:43
As a chemistry major in college, I can tell you that atoms are composed in the majority of empty space. Therefore, the idea that a chair or other object is 'solid' is an illusion.
Time is a man-made construct used to measure the flow of events. Time can be distorted, as Einstein noted in his studies.
Gravity bends light and makes (for example) stars appear to be in one spot when in fact they are actually in another spot.
All these things point to the fact that much of what we consider to be 'reality' is in fact illusion.
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Faith | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.