![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 8 to 32 of 193. Go back in thread:
Posted by yxibow on October 25, 2009, at 20:23:31
In reply to Re: involuntary tweet / facebook options?, posted by Dinah on October 25, 2009, at 20:08:10
I saw this here too... its bad enough that discussions that should be private, helpful information (including this post) is splattered all over Google FOREVER, but I'm not going to have any more posts tweeted and Facebooked.
That part of my life, one's real persona, is deliberately and with consequences, one's job, livelihood, stigma of mental illness, that should be obvious to Dr. Bob, private.
This is my last posting unless there is COMPLETE explanation of this.
Posted by psych chat on October 25, 2009, at 20:55:17
In reply to involuntary tweet / facebook options?, posted by floatingbridge on October 25, 2009, at 19:20:45
I would like the option to edit all my posts.
All of my posts I have written on this forum have those icons on them. While I realize anyone can cut and past what we've wrote and put it on their facebook account, I think its intrusive to encourage people to do this - its encouraging by the ease of clicking that button, plus it may be make it tempting just for it being there.
Perhaps people would not even think of sending others mental health issues out into the realm of social networks if those icons were not there.
There are people discussing their suicidal feelings on this site. It seems sick and twisted to have facebook and twitter icons at the bottom of their posts, along with many others....
Dr. Bob-if you regularly discussed your own personal experiences in psychotherapy, your most intimate thoughts, your family problems, and all about your own mental health issues on this forum - how would you feel about this?
Posted by jane d on October 25, 2009, at 21:18:26
In reply to Re: involuntary tweet / facebook options?, posted by Dinah on October 25, 2009, at 19:55:23
> I propose that this only be done with posts made from this point forward, so that people can make the choice whether or not to post under these conditions.
>
This might make people less uncomfortable with this.It would also insure that anyone brought to Babble by following a link would find a current conversation not a thread that died out years ago. And that might make them more likely to stay.
Jane
Posted by Emily Elizabeth on October 25, 2009, at 21:57:00
In reply to Re: involuntary tweet / facebook options?, posted by Dinah on October 25, 2009, at 20:08:10
I also want to express my concern and displeasure.
Best,
EE
Posted by 10derHeart on October 25, 2009, at 22:05:09
In reply to Re: involuntary tweet / facebook options?, posted by Dinah on October 25, 2009, at 19:55:23
Sigh.
>I certainly do not someone using my words on facebook or twitter without my knowledge.
I know. Me, either, but the web is a public place. I suppose as far as the linking goes, people could always do that. Nothing I know of prevents anyone from placing a linked URL to anything on Babble on any other web page, to include Facebook and Twitter. Any URL can be copied and pasted in a couple seconds...many of us probably do it all the time in passing on info we've like someone else to read.... Not that I do it with someone's individual post here, but that's more of an ethical thing for me personally. Babble and all its posts are public, non-restricted, and have been all along. The little buttons just perhaps make it easier, more convenient, for someone to create the link?? And I think it is the psychological impact of that, and "yuck-factor" that some of us feel strongly, and that Dr. Bob does not probably grasp or....{shrug}
Not so excited **not** to see Dr. Bob on here, personally explaining to his community FIRST, what he has done, though. I feel sad about that.
His timing and choices are..... {double-sigh}}
Posted by 10derHeart on October 25, 2009, at 22:07:46
In reply to Could we restrict this to new posts only?, posted by jane d on October 25, 2009, at 21:18:26
Posted by Phillipa on October 26, 2009, at 0:06:36
In reply to Re: involuntary tweet / facebook options? » Dinah, posted by 10derHeart on October 25, 2009, at 23:05:09
Well that's one way to get rid of me as on facebook bob said that if he was my friend he could share and to consider my family and friends so declined now it's here. Maybe I'm not. no name
Posted by Phillipa on October 26, 2009, at 0:12:45
In reply to Re: involuntary tweet / facebook options? » Dinah, posted by 10derHeart on October 25, 2009, at 23:05:09
If it wasn't dead before it is now in my opinion of course. No name
Posted by 10derHeart on October 26, 2009, at 0:17:48
In reply to Re: Well Babble Is Dead Now In My Opinion, posted by Phillipa on October 26, 2009, at 0:12:45
Really?
I feel very much alive.
The strong opinions written here sound like those of people very much alive and kickin' :-)
Dead is a permanent condition (so to speak) and strong word. Seems if Babble had been dead as many times as that was suspected or opined here, it is remarkable in the way it ressurrects itself!
Babblecat with its nine lives!!
Posted by Phillipa on October 26, 2009, at 0:23:36
In reply to Re: Well Babble Is Dead Now In My Opinion » Phillipa, posted by 10derHeart on October 26, 2009, at 0:17:48
That was pretty funny. I'm a bit upset like a lot of others seem to be. I didn't mean to direct the other thread to you there's that trigger finger. Ugg still no name
Posted by Deneb on October 26, 2009, at 0:24:13
In reply to Re: Well Babble Is Dead Now In My Opinion, posted by Phillipa on October 26, 2009, at 0:12:45
Dr. Bob, I support you and everything, but I sure hope this works and brings in more people because people seem to be leaving over this.
Posted by Phillipa on October 26, 2009, at 0:25:46
In reply to Dr. Bob, I hope your idea works, posted by Deneb on October 26, 2009, at 0:24:13
Deneb sorry I'm out of here if so no name
Posted by rjlockhart04-08 on October 26, 2009, at 0:56:03
In reply to Dr. Bob, I hope your idea works, posted by Deneb on October 26, 2009, at 0:24:13
Who put this idea together, do people find it intresting for other people to read our post's. I mean give an example, come here Patty...Patty is your everyday Ford Taurus lady that has dialup and get's kicked off the internet highway because her ford taurus is to slow only 56miles per hour, and i'm sure she would want a tweet on live stream...Patty tell me what you think about this: Well, been seeing them deputies around here, and I can't seem to find the correct place to put my responses and then tweet, what is tweet? a telephone? or a bird? back in my day I just awnsered the phone from the biblesales man call's and tells me my bible is ready. Me and Dot, can't afford much, but I say get this tweet out here!
I'm off: i'm joinin Ruby Rhod live.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQEwaRVhWccThank you ladies and gentlemen, no tweet or facebook!
Posted by softheprairie on October 26, 2009, at 1:36:01
In reply to involuntary tweet / facebook options?, posted by floatingbridge on October 25, 2009, at 20:20:45
Dr. Bob, I am very displeased with the new icons, plus your lack of explanation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I not only want to opt out, I want the opt-out to be the default position, and people who want their posts to be easily tweetable or facebookable with an icon/link here should specifically have to opt in.
Posted by 10derHeart on October 26, 2009, at 2:03:06
In reply to Re: I doubt it, posted by Phillipa on October 26, 2009, at 0:25:46
I was wondering what it means when you write:
no name
your posts are still connected to the name Phillipa anyway, unless you change your posting name...
Are you just angry?
Just curious.
Posted by 10derHeart on October 26, 2009, at 2:07:44
In reply to Re: Well Babble Is Dead Now In My Opinion » 10derHeart, posted by Phillipa on October 26, 2009, at 0:23:36
I wasn't really trying to be funny, so much.
Except to maybe...put things in perspective.
I don't see Babble as dead as long as some people are posting here.
People have been angry - VERY - about quite a few things over the years, and yet Babble remains.
I am a big fan of glass half full...
Posted by delna on October 26, 2009, at 4:07:11
In reply to Re: tweet, facebook, if this is real I've left PB, posted by yxibow on October 25, 2009, at 21:23:31
Posted by emme on October 26, 2009, at 6:51:48
In reply to involuntary tweet / facebook options?, posted by floatingbridge on October 25, 2009, at 20:20:45
Although I'm not a frequent poster, I've been around here for several years. There have been various things I've disagreed with about site administration over the years, but I've still thought the forum had good people and was worth participating in.
This has changed things for me. I realize that what we write here is available for the galaxy to read and that links can be posted on other web pages, but a direct pipeline to facebook and twitter makes me very uncomfortable.
Unless this is explained or resolved in a way that I'm comfortable with, then I won't be posting here any longer.
emme
Posted by seldomseen on October 26, 2009, at 7:16:44
In reply to involuntary tweet / facebook options?, posted by floatingbridge on October 25, 2009, at 20:20:45
I would have hoped that there would have been some advanced notice/discussion of this prior its implementation. This linking just makes it more likely that someone could discover our real identities, and we should have been made aware of increased likelihood of that adverse event.
I also wish that the ability to link would show up only on posts that I wrote. Something just feels very amiss now that anyone, and not just Dr. Bob could tweet my posts. By posting, I freely gave permssion to Dr. Bob to use my posts, I did not specifically give any one else that permission.
I am aware that the internet is free game, and anyone can do anything with what I write, but this is giving the immediate tools to do so.I also contend, and absolutely agree with the poster that would like to see this ability to share limited only to new posts. That would also decrease the likelihood of inadvertent discovery, by allowing posters to censor their posts.
I know this might not be possible, and may seem outright exclusionary, but I would also like for the psychology board to be exempt from this sharing. Posters there share some very intimate things about themselves and their therapists. That board "works" because of the creation of a supportive space. Yes, it is the internet, but there is a strong sense of community and safety on that board.
Surely Dr. Bob would not consider allowing other posters to share people's posts on a rape crisis board, or a sexual abuse board. It would be outrageous and demeaning. Sometimes that level of intimacy is reached on the psych board.
All in all, I see a significant increase in risk involved now when posting at babble, and I was not informed of this increase prior to its implementation. Even if this is just an increase in *perceived* risk, it would still influence participation.
I would truly hope that Dr. Bob would at least implement the above measures to decrease this risk.
Seldom
Posted by rskontos on October 26, 2009, at 8:55:03
In reply to This represents a marked increase in risk., posted by seldomseen on October 26, 2009, at 7:16:44
I emailed him demanding to be deleted. He is not trustworthy. And this action is uncivil to all of us that requested not to be splashed all over twitter or facebook. I am not following him.
He wants us to participate here but he destroyed the facade of privacy and a mutual participation here. He took all of us, and is now using our pain and suffering the way he wants to.
My initial feelings of being a lab rat have come to pass.
I am out of here for good. I want to be blocked. i want to be DELETED from this site.
THis is not a good place anymore because of Dr. Bob. He ruined it.
rsk
Posted by rskontos on October 26, 2009, at 9:03:57
In reply to This represents a marked increase in risk., posted by seldomseen on October 26, 2009, at 7:16:44
just a lazy way to twitter and to reflect all back to this site. Why not let the two remain separate like you said you would. I see that you have posted/twittered posts from babblers that said no, like SLS, Dinah, Seldom and others. Why did you do that when you said you wouldn't. How can you be trusted now?
I can't believe you would do this. It is shocking.
Posted by blahblahblah on October 26, 2009, at 9:15:38
In reply to involuntary tweet / facebook options?, posted by floatingbridge on October 25, 2009, at 20:20:45
I think the best solution for this would be for Babble to have a setting where we can choose to have the tweet/facebook option under our posts or not. That way people that are fine about it will have the icons under their posts, and people that aren't will select a setting where the icon's will not be there. That should keep the babblers, and Dr.Bob happy (to assume he wanted it there for reasons).
Posted by Dinah on October 26, 2009, at 9:56:27
In reply to Re: Not to mention Dr Bob that it is, posted by rskontos on October 26, 2009, at 9:03:57
I hadn't said no to Dr. Bob tweeting my posts.
I would say no to this, if I had a choice. At least with Dr. Bob I could go to his twitter page and see what he'd done. Inviting others to tweet posts feels totally different to me. At best, it gives me the creepy (to me) feeling of having people talking behind my back, in semi-public. At worst, I can see a potential that this could be used for online bullying. If Dr. Bob is giving the invite for people to use posts in this way, I hope he's also taking the responsibility for how they might be used.
I know it could always be done. But there wasn't always a button saying "Tweet Me" at the bottom of each post.
In the end it might be moot. Linking babble from your real Twitter or Facebook pages is giving those from your real life, coworkers, employers, friends, family, former schoolmates, whatever, a pretty good hint that you post here, and your posting identity might not be all that anonymous among people who know you. (Using the universal you here of course.) I can't imagine that most people would want their onscreen babble personas linked with their real life identities. So it might be just a few "real" twitter or facebook identities, and a few specially created ones that would be unlikely to be discovered by many outside a small circle who already know Babble.
As it is, I just won't post anything that matters to me. Unfortunately, I can't go back in time and choose what to post knowing this use, because it wasn't an issue then. Context is everything. Finding Babble through Google shows everything I post in context. Tweeting or linking of Facebook is a selective process that might not show context. For example, people could tweet certain blocks of Dr. Bob or certain responses he has given over the years, and out of context it might give the wrong appearance.
I'm very very disappointed that Dr. Bob did this, and how he did this. No mention beforehand, just a tweet announcing it after the fact. I had expected a more open introduction. I am also disappointed that there is no warning about the potential consequences of linking Babble to real life twitter and Facebook personas.
I can't believe that Facebook and Twitter allow this to be done against the will of the poster. There ought to be a law.
{I request that no one tweet any of my posts without asking me first.}
Posted by Dinah on October 26, 2009, at 10:26:03
In reply to Re: Not to mention Dr Bob that it is » rskontos, posted by Dinah on October 26, 2009, at 9:56:27
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrRUXsDumrM&feature=channel
About a minute and a half in.
Dr. Bob, you presented this to us on a garbage can lid.
Posted by Dinah on October 26, 2009, at 10:49:50
In reply to Oh, and Dr. Bob?, posted by Dinah on October 26, 2009, at 10:26:03
Does this have something to do with your tweet on October 18 on your Dr Bob twitter page, not Babble's Twitter page.
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.