![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 5 of 5. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Lou Pilder on September 21, 2009, at 7:05:18
Mr. Hsiung,
In accordance with your reminder procedure, I sent two more notifications a few days ago and they are outstanding.
Now it is my understanding that the administration of the site has the function to provide support for the members in relation to that notifications alert the administration to either take action to prevent potential harm to members from posts that contain statements that have the potential to inflict emotional/psychological harm to a member or to reply to the one sending the notification as to why the statement in question as allowed to stand by you.
This brings up the possibilities that could exist as to the administration not either attending to the notification in the thread where the statement in question appears, or to reply to the one sending the notification as to why it is not attended to. These possibilities have IMO broad implications that I would like to have clarified.
In relation to that you have asked me to send notifications to you again previously, I have already told you that I feel that by you asking me to send them again that I am being subjected to additional conditions to have a notification responded to so could you please not ask me again to resend a notification, for I feel pressured when you do that after I have posted to you that I will not resend notifications unless each member of the administration posts here that they have no other way to find the notification that I have a confirmation of sending it to you other than me sending it to you over again.
At this juncture, you have posted here in relation to my requests for attending to notifications as reminders by me that they are outstanding the following explanations as to why they are outstanding.
A. You have {missed}them
B. Some can not be answered by the administration as to that you wrote {we}.{then some can?}
C. Some you need more time to attend to (could you email me with that reason to the ones that are related to that reason?)
D. A deputy of yours has posted that a notification by me was known but was deleted by them.
E. (redacted by resondent)
F.. other reasons not stated
Now I do not know what you are wanting to mean by {missed} nor do I know which reason you are using as to why the notifications remain outstanding. But you have posted that you want to attend to statements quickly as in comparison to that a small fire could turn into a forest fire. I have taken you at your word.
Lou Pilder
Posted by Lou Pilder on September 21, 2009, at 9:21:03
In reply to Lou's remimder to Mr. Hsiung-psuhpoart, posted by Lou Pilder on September 21, 2009, at 7:05:18
> Mr. Hsiung,
> In accordance with your reminder procedure, I sent two more notifications a few days ago and they are outstanding.
> Now it is my understanding that the administration of the site has the function to provide support for the members in relation to that notifications alert the administration to either take action to prevent potential harm to members from posts that contain statements that have the potential to inflict emotional/psychological harm to a member or to reply to the one sending the notification as to why the statement in question as allowed to stand by you.
> This brings up the possibilities that could exist as to the administration not either attending to the notification in the thread where the statement in question appears, or to reply to the one sending the notification as to why it is not attended to. These possibilities have IMO broad implications that I would like to have clarified.
> In relation to that you have asked me to send notifications to you again previously, I have already told you that I feel that by you asking me to send them again that I am being subjected to additional conditions to have a notification responded to so could you please not ask me again to resend a notification, for I feel pressured when you do that after I have posted to you that I will not resend notifications unless each member of the administration posts here that they have no other way to find the notification that I have a confirmation of sending it to you other than me sending it to you over again.
> At this juncture, you have posted here in relation to my requests for attending to notifications as reminders by me that they are outstanding the following explanations as to why they are outstanding.
> A. You have {missed}them
> B. Some can not be answered by the administration as to that you wrote {we}.{then some can?}
> C. Some you need more time to attend to (could you email me with that reason to the ones that are related to that reason?)
> D. A deputy of yours has posted that a notification by me was known but was deleted by them.
> E. (redacted by resondent)
> F.. other reasons not stated
> Now I do not know what you are wanting to mean by {missed} nor do I know which reason you are using as to why the notifications remain outstanding. But you have posted that you want to attend to statements quickly as in comparison to that a small fire could turn into a forest fire. I have taken you at your word.
> Lou PilderMr. Hsiung ,
I wrote to you that I feel that by you asking me to resend notifications, even after I have told you that I will not unless each member of the administration posts here that they have no other way to find it unless I resend it, that that is in my thinking an additional condition to me that I will do not want to be subjected to. This still stands, but I do want to correct that after reviewing this ongoing situation that I do not feel pressured by you when you ask me to resend notifications. I apologize for writing that, for that is not what I intended to post here concerning my feelings about this ongoing situation.
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on September 21, 2009, at 9:54:37
In reply to Lou's correction to aspects of previous post, posted by Lou Pilder on September 21, 2009, at 9:21:03
> > Mr. Hsiung,
> > In accordance with your reminder procedure, I sent two more notifications a few days ago and they are outstanding.
> > Now it is my understanding that the administration of the site has the function to provide support for the members in relation to that notifications alert the administration to either take action to prevent potential harm to members from posts that contain statements that have the potential to inflict emotional/psychological harm to a member or to reply to the one sending the notification as to why the statement in question as allowed to stand by you.
> > This brings up the possibilities that could exist as to the administration not either attending to the notification in the thread where the statement in question appears, or to reply to the one sending the notification as to why it is not attended to. These possibilities have IMO broad implications that I would like to have clarified.
> > In relation to that you have asked me to send notifications to you again previously, I have already told you that I feel that by you asking me to send them again that I am being subjected to additional conditions to have a notification responded to so could you please not ask me again to resend a notification, for I feel pressured when you do that after I have posted to you that I will not resend notifications unless each member of the administration posts here that they have no other way to find the notification that I have a confirmation of sending it to you other than me sending it to you over again.
> > At this juncture, you have posted here in relation to my requests for attending to notifications as reminders by me that they are outstanding the following explanations as to why they are outstanding.
> > A. You have {missed}them
> > B. Some can not be answered by the administration as to that you wrote {we}.{then some can?}
> > C. Some you need more time to attend to (could you email me with that reason to the ones that are related to that reason?)
> > D. A deputy of yours has posted that a notification by me was known but was deleted by them.
> > E. (redacted by resondent)
> > F.. other reasons not stated
> > Now I do not know what you are wanting to mean by {missed} nor do I know which reason you are using as to why the notifications remain outstanding. But you have posted that you want to attend to statements quickly as in comparison to that a small fire could turn into a forest fire. I have taken you at your word.
> > Lou Pilder
>
> Mr. Hsiung ,
> I wrote to you that I feel that by you asking me to resend notifications, even after I have told you that I will not unless each member of the administration posts here that they have no other way to find it unless I resend it, that that is in my thinking an additional condition to me that I will do not want to be subjected to. This still stands, but I do want to correct that after reviewing this ongoing situation that I do not feel pressured by you when you ask me to resend notifications. I apologize for writing that, for that is not what I intended to post here concerning my feelings about this ongoing situation.
> LouMr. Hsiung,
The aspect of you posting to use the notification system and then by my using such there are numerous outstanding requests, notifications and emails, has caused me to enlist a professional in relation to this ongoing situation here.
I am asking other members, as well as concerned people in the firld of mental health or students or others to email me if they are concerned and can see things that I may not see here in relation to giving possible help to me in understanding this ongoing situation, for I am unsure as to what this situation could mean.
Lou
lpilder_1188@fuse.net
Posted by Dr. Bob on September 23, 2009, at 3:05:55
In reply to Lou's remimder to Mr. Hsiung-psuhpoart, posted by Lou Pilder on September 21, 2009, at 7:05:18
> Now I do not know what you are wanting to mean by {missed} nor do I know which reason you are using as to why the notifications remain outstanding. But you have posted that you want to attend to statements quickly as in comparison to that a small fire could turn into a forest fire. I have taken you at your word.
Thanks, I got behind. I'm trying to catch up a little now. It would be great if you and other posters could help with the small fires, too.
Bob
Posted by Lou Pilder on September 23, 2009, at 8:40:33
In reply to Re: Lou's remimder, posted by Dr. Bob on September 23, 2009, at 3:05:55
> > Now I do not know what you are wanting to mean by {missed} nor do I know which reason you are using as to why the notifications remain outstanding. But you have posted that you want to attend to statements quickly as in comparison to that a small fire could turn into a forest fire. I have taken you at your word.
>
> Thanks, I got behind. I'm trying to catch up a little now. It would be great if you and other posters could help with the small fires, too.
>
> BobMr. Hsiung,
You wrote,[...I'm trying to catch up....you and other posters could help...]
The adminstrative function is to provide support for members by doing the adminstartive function of sanctioning and such. Members are not listed in the TOS here as having the authority to sanction, for they are here in many conditions seeking help which could be their priority concern which means to me that to ask members to do administrative functions could be too great of a burden to some here. Statements that could have the potential to lead them to feel put down or accused are not supportive according to your TOS and administartive action to quench any potential fire to them are IMO the function and duty for the administariuon to sanction promptly as to be in line with your TOS here saying that a small fire can spread into a forest fire and that support is a higher priority to you than other issues here (members could email me for Mr. Hsiung's statement concerning this for there have been rules made to me here that I am unsure of as to if I could even post a link to a post here by Mr. Hsiung).
The TOS here states that members use the notification procedure for support to alert you concerning statements in question. I have done that and also used your reminder procedure and your reminder procedure to remind you of the reminders. Do not I and others have an expectation for the notifications to be attended to by you as per your own TOS here? I can not send notifications to other members for them to sanction statements, for members can not sanction, for that is an administrative function per your TOS.
Lou Pilder
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.