Shown: posts 1 to 5 of 5. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by floatingbridge on July 5, 2009, at 4:15:14
Hi,
While trying to find information to my usual questions, I noticed much of the Psyhcopahrmacology Tips have not been updated since 1995-1998. I hear newer information talked about on the board. I think the tips page is a is a great service in need of an update.
FB
Posted by Dinah on July 5, 2009, at 10:26:06
In reply to Update of psychopharmacology tips needed?, posted by floatingbridge on July 5, 2009, at 4:15:14
This came up once before, and if I remember correctly, Dr. Bob might have asked if anyone was willing to do this?
I'm not sure I'm remembering correctly.
Posted by Dr. Bob on July 5, 2009, at 17:02:54
In reply to Update of psychopharmacology tips needed?, posted by floatingbridge on July 5, 2009, at 4:15:14
> While trying to find information to my usual questions, I noticed much of the Psyhcopahrmacology Tips have not been updated since 1995-1998. I hear newer information talked about on the board. I think the tips page is a is a great service in need of an update.
I agree, I wish I had the time!
Bob
Posted by floatingbridge on July 5, 2009, at 17:06:17
In reply to Re: Update of psychopharmacology tips needed, posted by Dr. Bob on July 5, 2009, at 17:02:54
Yes, enough time. Sigh. Something to delegate? But then again, I know it is a time consuming project....
fb
Posted by Lou Pilder on July 6, 2009, at 11:35:17
In reply to Re: Update of psychopharmacology tips needed, posted by Dr. Bob on July 5, 2009, at 17:02:54
> > While trying to find information to my usual questions, I noticed much of the Psyhcopahrmacology Tips have not been updated since 1995-1998. I hear newer information talked about on the board. I think the tips page is a is a great service in need of an update.
>
> I agree, I wish I had the time!
>
> BobMr. Hsiung,
You wrote,[...I agree, I wish I had the time...].
I am unsure as to what the degree of your concern here is in relation to doinng something to that section of the communnity.
Could you post here what your degree of concern could be so that I can then post a response to what you post?
If you could, then I could know a measurment of the concern that you give to that there are posts in that section advocating that some drugs are good drugs when the FDA has pulled off the market and warnings have been given about some particular drugs as to that they have caused deaths.
Now this is not a one-person issue as I had previously brought this section up and pointed out the drug that had been taken off the market by the FDA here as to it caused deaths. Now floatinbridge sees that an update is a concern of hers/his.
Also, if you could comment on that you have posted here sometime back something like that you [...give support a higher priority...], as to what priority you give to floatingbridge's request compared to spending your time working with {twitter}, then I could have some idea of your conception of what support, in your thinking, could be here.
Also, if you agree with floatinbridge and wish you had more time to update the section on {tips}, could it not be reasonable to close the section now and have a page in its place come up when it is actuated that says something like,[...THIS SECTION IS CLOSED WHILE UNDER REVISION...]? If not, could you post your rationale hear for leaving the section alone? If you could, then I could have a bwetter understanding of your {degree of concern} for those members and others that use that section as it stands and respond accordingly.
Lou Pilder
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.