![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 5 to 29 of 29. Go back in thread:
Posted by SLS on March 14, 2008, at 13:03:28
In reply to Lou's request to Mr. Hsiung-sntvtothrs, posted by Lou Pilder on March 14, 2008, at 9:38:42
Hi Lou.
I am curious to know how you feel the foundations of Judaism have been preyed upon by administration. If you have the time, can you cite some examples in the posting history of this?
Thank you.
- Scott
Posted by Lou Pilder on March 14, 2008, at 13:57:12
In reply to Re: Lou's request to Mr. Hsiung-sntvtothrs » Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on March 14, 2008, at 13:03:28
> Hi Lou.
>
> I am curious to know how you feel the foundations of Judaism have been preyed upon by administration. If you have the time, can you cite some examples in the posting history of this?
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> - ScottScott,
You wrote,[...cite some of the examples in the posting history...
There have been new rules made here about a year or so ago that I am unsure as to if I can or can not post links, and links to posts here that have been allowed to stand. Also, I am unsure from those new rules as to if I can post a link to a post here authored by Mr. Hsiung. I have requested for criteria to be posted for members to use so that they could know in advance as to if what links to posts here that one could or could not post.
Lou
Posted by SLS on March 14, 2008, at 14:08:14
In reply to Lou's reply to SLS-dkbknthealy » SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on March 14, 2008, at 13:57:12
> > Hi Lou.
> >
> > I am curious to know how you feel the foundations of Judaism have been preyed upon by administration. If you have the time, can you cite some examples in the posting history of this?
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> >
> > - Scott
>
> Scott,
> You wrote,[...cite some of the examples in the posting history...
> There have been new rules made here about a year or so ago that I am unsure as to if I can or can not post links, and links to posts here that have been allowed to stand. Also, I am unsure from those new rules as to if I can post a link to a post here authored by Mr. Hsiung. I have requested for criteria to be posted for members to use so that they could know in advance as to if what links to posts here that one could or could not post.
> LouShame on me. I completely forgot about that aspect of targeting specific posters. I think you can be more specific in your explanation as long as it doesn't indict specific posts and posters. I would like to know in what ways you think Judaism has been deprecated by Dr. Bob or anyone else.
I hope you realize that it is not my intention to debate you. I just would like to know for myself whether or not I should share your concerns.
- Scott
Posted by Lou Pilder on March 14, 2008, at 14:16:33
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to SLS-dkbknthealy » Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on March 14, 2008, at 14:08:14
> > > Hi Lou.
> > >
> > > I am curious to know how you feel the foundations of Judaism have been preyed upon by administration. If you have the time, can you cite some examples in the posting history of this?
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Scott
> >
> > Scott,
> > You wrote,[...cite some of the examples in the posting history...
> > There have been new rules made here about a year or so ago that I am unsure as to if I can or can not post links, and links to posts here that have been allowed to stand. Also, I am unsure from those new rules as to if I can post a link to a post here authored by Mr. Hsiung. I have requested for criteria to be posted for members to use so that they could know in advance as to if what links to posts here that one could or could not post.
> > Lou
>
> Shame on me. I completely forgot about that aspect of targeting specific posters. I think you can be more specific in your explanation as long as it doesn't indict specific posts and posters. I would like to know in what ways you think Judaism has been deprecated by Dr. Bob or anyone else.
>
> I hope you realize that it is not my intention to debate you. I just would like to know for myself whether or not I should share your concerns.
>
>
> - Scott
> Scott,
How could one here post what you requested with out posting the link to the post?
Lou
>
>
Posted by SLS on March 14, 2008, at 14:28:46
In reply to Lou's reply to SLS-smknmrrs, posted by Lou Pilder on March 14, 2008, at 14:16:33
> > > > Hi Lou.
> > > >
> > > > I am curious to know how you feel the foundations of Judaism have been preyed upon by administration. If you have the time, can you cite some examples in the posting history of this?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Scott
> > >
> > > Scott,
> > > You wrote,[...cite some of the examples in the posting history...
> > > There have been new rules made here about a year or so ago that I am unsure as to if I can or can not post links, and links to posts here that have been allowed to stand. Also, I am unsure from those new rules as to if I can post a link to a post here authored by Mr. Hsiung. I have requested for criteria to be posted for members to use so that they could know in advance as to if what links to posts here that one could or could not post.
> > > Lou
> >
> > Shame on me. I completely forgot about that aspect of targeting specific posters. I think you can be more specific in your explanation as long as it doesn't indict specific posts and posters. I would like to know in what ways you think Judaism has been deprecated by Dr. Bob or anyone else.
> >
> > I hope you realize that it is not my intention to debate you. I just would like to know for myself whether or not I should share your concerns.
> >
> >
> > - Scott
> > Scott,
> How could one here post what you requested with out posting the link to the post?
> LouI see.
Easy. You just don't do it.
Perhaps you can simply begin by saying:
I have concerns...
These are my concerns...
This is the scenario by which I believe my concerns are actualized...
These are the consequences of such a scenario...
Describe hypotheticals. Indicate that, in your opinion, these hypotheticals indeed exist.
I would not attempt to implicate specific people by alluding to numbers.
Go for it.
- Scott
Posted by Lou Pilder on March 14, 2008, at 14:34:50
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to SLS-smknmrrs, posted by SLS on March 14, 2008, at 14:28:46
> > > > > Hi Lou.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am curious to know how you feel the foundations of Judaism have been preyed upon by administration. If you have the time, can you cite some examples in the posting history of this?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - Scott
> > > >
> > > > Scott,
> > > > You wrote,[...cite some of the examples in the posting history...
> > > > There have been new rules made here about a year or so ago that I am unsure as to if I can or can not post links, and links to posts here that have been allowed to stand. Also, I am unsure from those new rules as to if I can post a link to a post here authored by Mr. Hsiung. I have requested for criteria to be posted for members to use so that they could know in advance as to if what links to posts here that one could or could not post.
> > > > Lou
> > >
> > > Shame on me. I completely forgot about that aspect of targeting specific posters. I think you can be more specific in your explanation as long as it doesn't indict specific posts and posters. I would like to know in what ways you think Judaism has been deprecated by Dr. Bob or anyone else.
> > >
> > > I hope you realize that it is not my intention to debate you. I just would like to know for myself whether or not I should share your concerns.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Scott
> > > Scott,
> > How could one here post what you requested with out posting the link to the post?
> > Lou
>
> I see.
>
> Easy. You just don't do it.
>
> Perhaps you can simply begin by saying:
>
> I have concerns...
>
> These are my concerns...
>
> This is the scenario by which I believe my concerns are actualized...
>
> These are the consequences of such a scenario...
>
> Describe hypotheticals. Indicate that, in your opinion, these hypotheticals indeed exist.
>
> I would not attempt to implicate specific people by alluding to numbers.
>
> Go for it.
>
>
> - Scott
> Scott,
You wrote to post what actualizes my concerns. What actualizes my concerns is what is in the post that I am unsure as to if I can post it or not due to the new rules being made about a year ago or so.
One could email me if they like to see those posts.
Lou
Lou
Posted by SLS on March 14, 2008, at 16:15:02
In reply to Lou's reply to SLS-msrum » SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on March 14, 2008, at 14:34:50
Hi Lou.
Like I said, it is not necessary for you to cite a specific event in order for you to verbalize your concerns. I am genuinely interested to know what it is you experience that you feel is irreverent.
You very often answer a question by posing another question. It is very difficult to maintain a conversation under these circumstances. If you could answer the questions that I pose to you, I will be better able to respond.
I do not look to disparage you or deprecate your feelings. Again, my interest in your concerns is genuine. However, we can't have much of a discourse if both of us ask questions and give no answers.
You exercise a great deal of logic when you formulate your posts. However, the grammatical precision with which you write makes it difficult to understand them sometimes.
Let me know if there is anything I can do to make my gibberish more comprehendible.
Again, I would like to know what is it that appears on the Faith board that you consider to be deprecating of Judaism. You need not direct our attention to any one post or poster specifically.
Example 1: I believe it is deprecating to Judaism to allow posters to recite that there is but one way to God through the Son. This is what my concern is...
Example 2: I believe that Dr. Hsiung's picture appearing at the top of the Faith board is an affirmation that such recitations are endorsed by administration. This is what my concern is...
Example 3: I have seen posts that say that Jews hold a special place in Christianity as being the Chosen People from whom Jesus ascended. This is what my concern is...
Thank you for your correspondence.
- Scott
Posted by Lou Pilder on March 14, 2008, at 17:04:40
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to SLS-msrum » Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on March 14, 2008, at 16:15:02
> Hi Lou.
>
> Like I said, it is not necessary for you to cite a specific event in order for you to verbalize your concerns. I am genuinely interested to know what it is you experience that you feel is irreverent.
>
> You very often answer a question by posing another question. It is very difficult to maintain a conversation under these circumstances. If you could answer the questions that I pose to you, I will be better able to respond.
>
> I do not look to disparage you or deprecate your feelings. Again, my interest in your concerns is genuine. However, we can't have much of a discourse if both of us ask questions and give no answers.
>
> You exercise a great deal of logic when you formulate your posts. However, the grammatical precision with which you write makes it difficult to understand them sometimes.
>
> Let me know if there is anything I can do to make my gibberish more comprehendible.
>
> Again, I would like to know what is it that appears on the Faith board that you consider to be deprecating of Judaism. You need not direct our attention to any one post or poster specifically.
>
> Example 1: I believe it is deprecating to Judaism to allow posters to recite that there is but one way to God through the Son. This is what my concern is...
>
> Example 2: I believe that Dr. Hsiung's picture appearing at the top of the Faith board is an affirmation that such recitations are endorsed by administration. This is what my concern is...
>
> Example 3: I have seen posts that say that Jews hold a special place in Christianity as being the Chosen People from whom Jesus ascended. This is what my concern is...
>
> Thank you for your correspondence.
>
>
> - Scott
>Scott,
You wrote,[...verbalize your concerns...]
Could you take a look at the opening page of the faith forum and clik on the offered links? Then if you see something that you think is of discussion in regards to this topic, could you post it?
Lou
Posted by SLS on March 14, 2008, at 19:20:19
In reply to Lou's reply to SLS-shdwvyrsml » SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on March 14, 2008, at 17:04:40
> > You very often answer a question by posing another question. It is very difficult to maintain a conversation under these circumstances. If you could answer the questions that I pose to you, I will be better able to respond.
> Scott,
> You wrote,[...verbalize your concerns...]
> Could you take a look at the opening page of the faith forum and clik on the offered links? Then if you see something that you think is of discussion in regards to this topic, could you post it?
> LouLet's get going already! Don't be bashful, now.
Scott - Q:
Lou - A:
Scott - Q:
Lou - A:Please review our previous posts along this thread so that you will once again have an opportunity to respond to my questions.
Lou, if you do not answer my questions, I doubt that I can participate in a discussion with you.
You are the one having submitted complaints, not me. It is incumbent upon you to state concisely your opinions and supporting facts.
Please try again. You have nothing to gain from asking of me any more questions.
Don't let this discussion become irrelevant.
- Scott
Posted by Lou Pilder on March 14, 2008, at 20:56:03
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to SLS-shdwvyrsml » Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on March 14, 2008, at 19:20:19
> > > You very often answer a question by posing another question. It is very difficult to maintain a conversation under these circumstances. If you could answer the questions that I pose to you, I will be better able to respond.
>
>
> > Scott,
> > You wrote,[...verbalize your concerns...]
> > Could you take a look at the opening page of the faith forum and clik on the offered links? Then if you see something that you think is of discussion in regards to this topic, could you post it?
> > Lou
>
> Let's get going already! Don't be bashful, now.
>
> Scott - Q:
> Lou - A:
> Scott - Q:
> Lou - A:
>
> Please review our previous posts along this thread so that you will once again have an opportunity to respond to my questions.
>
> Lou, if you do not answer my questions, I doubt that I can participate in a discussion with you.
>
> You are the one having submitted complaints, not me. It is incumbent upon you to state concisely your opinions and supporting facts.
>
> Please try again. You have nothing to gain from asking of me any more questions.
>
> Don't let this discussion become irrelevant.
>
>
> - ScottScott,
You wrote,[...please try again...]
The aspect of what is involved here includes what has been used here in this forum as the concept of posting what {could lead one to feel accused or put down}. Another aspect is what Mr. Hsiung has posted in regards to if a member believes something.
There are generally accepted meanings to those concepts. Yet today, I am unsure as to if the generally accepted meanings are being held here to apply in some cases. These cases could be seen in this thread if I posted the links to posts that have been allowed to stand and posts that have been sanctioned, but the new rules that I have been referring to make me unsure as to if I could post the links to the posts even though some of the posts in question have been allowed to stand and/or have been authored by Mr. Hsiung or one of his deputies.
Also, there is a post from Mr. Hsiung here concerning what will happen to me here if I was to post the foundation of my faith in that it has been revealed to me supernaturally a commandment to me that I XXX (the foundation of Judaism) that I would like to post but that the new rules make me unsure as to if I could post it or not even thought the faith forum is for posting about the supernatural.
There are also posts that have historical paralles such as XXX and YYY that I am unsure as to if I could post those here for referrence in our discussion.
Without posting those links and also links to other's research that I am also unsure as to if I could post those links here, I am unsure as to how I could post answers to your questions in your posts here to me.
I do have a possible solution to contimue our discussion because that I think that the links to the posts in question can not be left out of the discussion. One suggestion is to either email me for the URLs of the posts in question or set up a yahoo account for me to email those to you or have a friend allow me to email to them and they email them to you.
I really would like to continue the discussion but I think that the posts in question need to be included in the discussion. I am sorry if you could not do one of the things to receive the links to those posts and look forward to having other discussions outside of this one if we can not share the URLs to the posts in question.
Lou
Posted by SLS on March 15, 2008, at 9:01:43
In reply to Lou's reply to SLS-LLhzgsd » SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on March 14, 2008, at 20:56:03
Hi Lou.
Thanks for clarifying why you feel unable to discuss this issue without being able to cite specific posts.
Did my examples approach the nature of your concerns?
"Example 1: I believe it is deprecating to Judaism to allow posters to recite that there is but one way to God through the Son. This is what my concern is...
Example 2: I believe that Dr. Hsiung's picture appearing at the top of the Faith board is an affirmation that such recitations are endorsed by administration. This is what my concern is...
Example 3: I have seen posts that say that Jews hold a special place in Christianity as being the Chosen People from whom Jesus ascended. This is what my concern is..."
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080313/msgs/817931.html
- Scott
Posted by Lou Pilder on March 15, 2008, at 9:09:34
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to SLS-LLhzgsd » Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on March 15, 2008, at 9:01:43
> Hi Lou.
>
> Thanks for clarifying why you feel unable to discuss this issue without being able to cite specific posts.
>
> Did my examples approach the nature of your concerns?
>
> "Example 1: I believe it is deprecating to Judaism to allow posters to recite that there is but one way to God through the Son. This is what my concern is...
>
> Example 2: I believe that Dr. Hsiung's picture appearing at the top of the Faith board is an affirmation that such recitations are endorsed by administration. This is what my concern is...
>
> Example 3: I have seen posts that say that Jews hold a special place in Christianity as being the Chosen People from whom Jesus ascended. This is what my concern is..."
>
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080313/msgs/817931.html
>
>
> - ScottScott,
You wrote,[...examples approach the nature...?]
I liked the way that you formated the examples, but could you list some more?
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on March 15, 2008, at 9:18:34
In reply to Lou's reply to SLS-psomchclsr » SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on March 15, 2008, at 9:09:34
> > Hi Lou.
> >
> > Thanks for clarifying why you feel unable to discuss this issue without being able to cite specific posts.
> >
> > Did my examples approach the nature of your concerns?
> >
> > "Example 1: I believe it is deprecating to Judaism to allow posters to recite that there is but one way to God through the Son. This is what my concern is...
> >
> > Example 2: I believe that Dr. Hsiung's picture appearing at the top of the Faith board is an affirmation that such recitations are endorsed by administration. This is what my concern is...
> >
> > Example 3: I have seen posts that say that Jews hold a special place in Christianity as being the Chosen People from whom Jesus ascended. This is what my concern is..."
> >
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080313/msgs/817931.html
> >
> >
> > - Scott
>
> Scott,
> You wrote,[...examples approach the nature...?]
> I liked the way that you formated the examples, but could you list some more?
> LouScott,
I think that if you use that type of format, that that could have the potential for us to continue the discussion without me posting the links if you post the right example. The ones that you listed could suffice as some type of starting point, but would take me weeks to develop. Perhaps if you listed some other examples we could expedite the matter.
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on March 30, 2008, at 17:04:28
In reply to Lou's request to Mr. Hsiung-img, posted by Lou Pilder on March 6, 2008, at 5:51:52
> Mr. Hsiung,
> I am requesting that we have a discussion here regarding that I would like for you to remove the photographic image of yourself from the faith forum and not replace it with any image. If you could remove the photographic image of yourself without discussion, that would be fine.
> Lou PilderMr. Hsiung,
In accordance with your reminder procedure, the above.
Lou Pider
Posted by Sigismund on March 31, 2008, at 23:58:24
In reply to Lou's request to Mr. Hsiung-eighdha, posted by Lou Pilder on March 30, 2008, at 17:04:28
This is not to do with graven images, is it Lou?
> > Mr. Hsiung,
> > I am requesting that we have a discussion here regarding that I would like for you to remove the photographic image of yourself from the faith forum and not replace it with any image. If you could remove the photographic image of yourself without discussion, that would be fine.
> > Lou Pilder
>
> Mr. Hsiung,
> In accordance with your reminder procedure, the above.
> Lou Pider
Posted by Lou Pilder on April 1, 2008, at 8:05:22
In reply to Re: Lou's request to Mr. Hsiung-eighdha » Lou Pilder, posted by Sigismund on March 31, 2008, at 23:58:24
> This is not to do with graven images, is it Lou?
>
>
>
> > > Mr. Hsiung,
> > > I am requesting that we have a discussion here regarding that I would like for you to remove the photographic image of yourself from the faith forum and not replace it with any image. If you could remove the photographic image of yourself without discussion, that would be fine.
> > > Lou Pilder
> >
> > Mr. Hsiung,
> > In accordance with your reminder procedure, the above.
> > Lou PiderSigismund,
You wrote,[...do with graven images...?]
I have asked for Mr. Hsiung to have dialog here concerning his having his photographic image on the faith board. I am awaiting his reply to me here for if I was to know his purpose of placing his photographic image on the faith board then it might be known as to what te significance of his image here means.
The aspects of my concern are:
A. His image is on the faith board
B. The faith board is for discussion of the service and worship of God or the supernatural
C. Mr. Hsiung's TOS writes that he wants members here to {trust} him and that he is doing what in his thinking will be good for the community as a whole
D. The foundation of Judaism could possibly be brought into this if it was known as to the reason that Mr. Hsiung has placed his photographic image on the faith board, so I am asking him to have discussion here in order to have that declared. Then I could respond accordingly.
Lou
Posted by gardenergirl on April 1, 2008, at 11:21:57
In reply to Lou's request to Mr. Hsiung-brntvwstvrgna » Sigismund, posted by Lou Pilder on April 1, 2008, at 8:05:22
I would imagine it's on that one because it's on all the others, too.
gg
Posted by Lou Pilder on April 1, 2008, at 14:07:53
In reply to Re: Lou's request to Mr. Hsiung-brntvwstvrgna » Lou Pilder, posted by gardenergirl on April 1, 2008, at 11:21:57
> I would imagine it's on that one because it's on all the others, too.
>
> ggFrinds,
It is written here,[...it's on that one(the faith board) because it's on all the others, too...].
My request to Mr. Hsiung is to discuss the removing of his photographic image for the faith board, and that it is not my concern here as to the other forums. If his reason for him placing his photographic image for all the boards is the same as his reason for the faith board, then if he posts that reason, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly as for his photographic image being on the faith board in regards to that it is on the other boards for the same reason too.
I ask the members here if they like, if they could post here in this thread what would be your reason to place a photographic image of yourself on the top of each board,assuming that the reason is the same for each board,if you were the owner, to post such here for discussional purposes, for it is conceivable to me that there could be different reasons for one to have their photographic image on the top of each board.
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 7, 2008, at 7:04:31
In reply to Lou's request to Mr. Hsiung-img, posted by Lou Pilder on March 6, 2008, at 5:51:52
> Mr. Hsiung,
> I am requesting that we have a discussion here regarding that I would like for you to remove the photographic image of yourself from the faith forum and not replace it with any image. If you could remove the photographic image of yourself without discussion, that would be fine.
> Lou PilderMr. Hsiung,
I have requested that we have discussion as to if you are willing to remove the photographic image of yourself or not from the faith forum. Could you post here if you are willing or not to have that discussion that I have requested?
Lou Pilder
Posted by Geegee on October 7, 2008, at 13:45:26
In reply to Lou's request to Mr. Hsiung-imgreaprs, posted by Lou Pilder on October 7, 2008, at 7:04:31
> > [Dr.] Hsiung,
> > I am requesting that we have a discussion here regarding that I would like for you to remove the photographic image of yourself from the faith forum and not replace it with any image. If you could remove the photographic image of yourself without discussion, that would be fine.
> > Lou Pilder
>
> [Dr]. Hsiung,
> I have requested that we have discussion as to if you are willing to remove the photographic image of yourself or not from the faith forum. Could you post here if you are willing or not to have that discussion that I have requested?
> Lou Pilder
>
Posted by Lou Pilder on August 11, 2009, at 7:30:58
In reply to Re: Lou's request to [Dr.] Hsiung-imgreaprs, posted by Geegee on October 7, 2008, at 13:45:26
> > > [Dr.] Hsiung,
> > > I am requesting that we have a discussion here regarding that I would like for you to remove the photographic image of yourself from the faith forum and not replace it with any image. If you could remove the photographic image of yourself without discussion, that would be fine.
> > > Lou Pilder
> >
> > [Dr]. Hsiung,
> > I have requested that we have discussion as to if you are willing to remove the photographic image of yourself or not from the faith forum. Could you post here if you are willing or not to have that discussion that I have requested?
> > Lou Pilder
> >
>
> Mr. Hsiung,
This is my reminder of the above request.
Lou Pilder
Posted by Dr. Bob on August 12, 2009, at 5:03:33
In reply to Lou's request to Mr. Hsiung, posted by Lou Pilder on August 11, 2009, at 7:30:58
> > > I have requested that we have discussion as to if you are willing to remove the photographic image of yourself or not from the faith forum. Could you post here if you are willing or not to have that discussion that I have requested?
I'm planning to keep an image at the top of each board, but it won't always be me.
Bob
Posted by Lou Pilder on August 12, 2009, at 19:38:19
In reply to Re: Lou's request, posted by Dr. Bob on August 12, 2009, at 5:03:33
> > > > I have requested that we have discussion as to if you are willing to remove the photographic image of yourself or not from the faith forum. Could you post here if you are willing or not to have that discussion that I have requested?
>
> I'm planning to keep an image at the top of each board, but it won't always be me.
>
> Bob
Mr. Hsiung,
You wrote,[...I'm planning...]
I am unsure as to your reply to my concern which is;[...would you be willing to remove the photographic image of yourself...?]answes my concern. You are planning to have an image there on the faith forum but your reply to me states that the image could be something other than an image of you.
I am not concerned with any image that is on the other boards, but the faith board is diferent to me here. And there could be others that could have the same concern as I, as per commandments from their God to them.
If we could have discussion further concerning this, it could go a great distance IMO to resolving many of my ongoing concerns here. If you could post answers to the following, then I think that we could get closer to resolutions to some of my concerns here.
A. Why is your photographic image on the faith forum?
B. Is it supportive of religious faith as per the guidlines for the faith forum?
C. If so, what is the criteria that you use to deem the use of your image as being supportive?
C. Could the faith forum do without your photographic image?
D. If you could put your photographic image on the top of the faith forum, could you also put a photographic image of a manorah or a crucifix or a moon phase or some other religious symbol?
E Your TOS states that you do what in your thinking will be good for the commmunity as a whole and that others are to try to trust you. How would it be good for the community as a whole to have your photographic image on the faith board? Would it also be good for the community as a whole if your image was not theere?
F. Could you post an example of a photographic image of someone else that you would you not place there?
G. other aspects not stated
Lou Pilder
Posted by Lou Pilder on August 12, 2009, at 20:44:32
In reply to Lou's reply-grvn » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on August 12, 2009, at 19:38:19
> > > > > I have requested that we have discussion as to if you are willing to remove the photographic image of yourself or not from the faith forum. Could you post here if you are willing or not to have that discussion that I have requested?
> >
> > I'm planning to keep an image at the top of each board, but it won't always be me.
> >
> > Bob
> Mr. Hsiung,
> You wrote,[...I'm planning...]
> I am unsure as to your reply to my concern which is;[...would you be willing to remove the photographic image of yourself...?]answes my concern. You are planning to have an image there on the faith forum but your reply to me states that the image could be something other than an image of you.
> I am not concerned with any image that is on the other boards, but the faith board is diferent to me here. And there could be others that could have the same concern as I, as per commandments from their God to them.
> If we could have discussion further concerning this, it could go a great distance IMO to resolving many of my ongoing concerns here. If you could post answers to the following, then I think that we could get closer to resolutions to some of my concerns here.
> A. Why is your photographic image on the faith forum?
> B. Is it supportive of religious faith as per the guidlines for the faith forum?
> C. If so, what is the criteria that you use to deem the use of your image as being supportive?
> C. Could the faith forum do without your photographic image?
> D. If you could put your photographic image on the top of the faith forum, could you also put a photographic image of a manorah or a crucifix or a moon phase or some other religious symbol?
> E Your TOS states that you do what in your thinking will be good for the commmunity as a whole and that others are to try to trust you. How would it be good for the community as a whole to have your photographic image on the faith board? Would it also be good for the community as a whole if your image was not theere?
> F. Could you post an example of a photographic image of someone else that you would you not place there?
> G. other aspects not stated
> Lou PilderMr. Hsiung,
I am withdrawing part F and there is no need to reply to that part.
Lou Pilder
Posted by Lou Pilder on August 12, 2009, at 21:18:06
In reply to Lou;s withdraw of part F about other images, posted by Lou Pilder on August 12, 2009, at 20:44:32
> > > > > > I have requested that we have discussion as to if you are willing to remove the photographic image of yourself or not from the faith forum. Could you post here if you are willing or not to have that discussion that I have requested?
> > >
> > > I'm planning to keep an image at the top of each board, but it won't always be me.
> > >
> > > Bob
> > Mr. Hsiung,
> > You wrote,[...I'm planning...]
> > I am unsure as to your reply to my concern which is;[...would you be willing to remove the photographic image of yourself...?]answes my concern. You are planning to have an image there on the faith forum but your reply to me states that the image could be something other than an image of you.
> > I am not concerned with any image that is on the other boards, but the faith board is diferent to me here. And there could be others that could have the same concern as I, as per commandments from their God to them.
> > If we could have discussion further concerning this, it could go a great distance IMO to resolving many of my ongoing concerns here. If you could post answers to the following, then I think that we could get closer to resolutions to some of my concerns here.
> > A. Why is your photographic image on the faith forum?
> > B. Is it supportive of religious faith as per the guidlines for the faith forum?
> > C. If so, what is the criteria that you use to deem the use of your image as being supportive?
> > C. Could the faith forum do without your photographic image?
> > D. If you could put your photographic image on the top of the faith forum, could you also put a photographic image of a manorah or a crucifix or a moon phase or some other religious symbol?
> > E Your TOS states that you do what in your thinking will be good for the commmunity as a whole and that others are to try to trust you. How would it be good for the community as a whole to have your photographic image on the faith board? Would it also be good for the community as a whole if your image was not theere?
> > F. Could you post an example of a photographic image of someone else that you would you not place there?
> > G. other aspects not stated
> > Lou Pilder
>
> Mr. Hsiung,
> I am withdrawing part F and there is no need to reply to that part.
> Lou PilderMr. Hsiung,
The explanation of part F is that it was not worded as I wanted it to be. What I wanted was to establish as a yes or a no as to if there could be a photographic image of someone that could not be posted, not to actually post one. Since the wording could be difficult, I am withdrawing the request.
Lou Pilder
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.