Psycho-Babble Administration Thread 537677

Shown: posts 15 to 39 of 39. Go back in thread:

 

Lou's response to-- yes, Lou, it is about you-fasm

Posted by Lou Pilder on August 5, 2005, at 14:52:26

In reply to Dr Bob -- yes, Lou, it is about you this time, posted by Racer on August 4, 2005, at 22:58:40

Friends,
I am requesting that if you are fgoing to respond to this thread that you read the folllowing link.
The link writes some about fascism and how that type of system of administration uses dehuminizing tactics and scapegoating and the forcible supression of points of view that are opposing to those that have obtained fascist power over others. The link is for discussion purposes and I do not endorse fascism.
Lou
http://remember.org/hist.root.what.html

 

Re: Lou's response to-- yes, Lou, it is about you- » Lou Pilder

Posted by NikkiT2 on August 5, 2005, at 15:03:18

In reply to Lou's response to-- yes, Lou, it is about you-fasm, posted by Lou Pilder on August 5, 2005, at 14:52:26

Lou,

are you suggesting that *anyone* here is acting in a fascist manner?

And if not, please explain WHY you would bring it up in this thread?

No one here is scapegoating. People get hurt by your "reuqests for determination / please take into account the following" type posts. Thats a fact, not an attempt at scapegoating.

I don't know how you feel about such words, but many people are shocked and offended when others suggest they could be fascist, or anti-semetic etc.

Please answer this with a real answer, and not further questions that are directed at board members for them to consider.

Nikki

 

hi nikki » NikkiT2

Posted by crushedout on August 5, 2005, at 15:07:04

In reply to Re: Lou's response to-- yes, Lou, it is about you- » Lou Pilder, posted by NikkiT2 on August 5, 2005, at 15:03:18

just a word of advice: you might want to try banging your head against a brick wall. i find that works better. (i'm just kidding. please don't actually bang your head.)

congrats on your job!

 

Re: hi nikki » crushedout

Posted by NikkiT2 on August 5, 2005, at 15:15:37

In reply to hi nikki » NikkiT2, posted by crushedout on August 5, 2005, at 15:07:04

Ah, atleast this way doesn't cause permanent scars *laughing*

And cheers.. its a fab job and a really fantastic opportunity!

Nikki xx

 

Re: hi nikki » NikkiT2

Posted by AuntieMel on August 5, 2005, at 15:39:30

In reply to Re: hi nikki » crushedout, posted by NikkiT2 on August 5, 2005, at 15:15:37

Don't let this ruin your great day.

Sometimes things should just go unacknowledged.

Go celebrate. Babble will be here in the morning.

 

Lou's response to-- yes, Lou, it is about you-scpg

Posted by Lou Pilder on August 5, 2005, at 16:39:22

In reply to Lou's response to-- yes, Lou, it is about you-fasm, posted by Lou Pilder on August 5, 2005, at 14:52:26

Friends,
it is written here something about scapegoating from another member here.
I am requesting that if you are going to reply to this thread that you consider the followin:
Scapegoating is a word that has ancient religious meanings. The ancient Jews had the concept of the scapegoat and then the Christians .
But scapegoating here can be a little different. The aspect of scapegoating used on a person in a group has been used historically as a tactic used by other members of a group to attatch blame on a person, holding that person responsible for something that could either exist or not in the community.
Either way, scapegoating can occur if there is someone calling others in the group to have blame attached to a person in a group by the others in the group.
In fascists countries, scapegoating has been used historically against many persons and groups. Hitler's scapegoating culminated in the holocaust. Millions of people were murdered. In looking at the historical chronology of the Nazi scapegoating of jews and others, there is a succession of things that happen. The first thing is to have someone publish something to arrouse blame to the one, or ones, that are being scapgoated.
In the innitial post in this thread, in your opinion, do you see any indication that any blame for anything in this community is being attempted to be attached to me? In your opinion, is there a statement in the innitial post that could have the potential for some others to think that I (Lou) is having attached blame for ,[...disrupting the entire group...]? And in your opinion, what could be the potential for some others to think that, considering that the poster writes,[...hope that others will at least indicate whether or not they agree with me here..].
There are many others here that have responded to the poster of the innitial post that they agree with that poster. When this happens, there could be the potential for others to {bandwagon} and there could be the potential for {mob rule} to ensue.
I am not ashamed to post responses to other's posts here, or to offer to consider aspects that IMO could be relevant to discussions here, for they are for consideration for discussion only. And I feel that even if I have charactorized as the {Lone Dissenter} here, I feel that I can hold my own and protect my integrity against anything that is written here that could have the potential to be considered an accusation that could have the potential to attach blame to me for anything real or imiagined here in this community.
Lou

 

Re: Ack! (nm)

Posted by AuntieMel on August 5, 2005, at 17:11:04

In reply to Re: hi nikki » crushedout, posted by NikkiT2 on August 5, 2005, at 15:15:37

 

Completely hysterical laughter! (nm)

Posted by crazy teresa on August 5, 2005, at 17:35:58

In reply to Re: Ack! (nm), posted by AuntieMel on August 5, 2005, at 17:11:04

 

oh, my. ??? :-( :-( ???.....and that's all. (nm)

Posted by 10derHeart on August 5, 2005, at 17:49:53

In reply to Re: hi nikki » crushedout, posted by NikkiT2 on August 5, 2005, at 15:15:37

 

Re Laughter is good for the soul (nm) » crazy teresa

Posted by AuntieMel on August 5, 2005, at 18:08:16

In reply to Completely hysterical laughter! (nm), posted by crazy teresa on August 5, 2005, at 17:35:58

 

Re: And good for the abs, too (nm) » crazy teresa

Posted by AuntieMel on August 5, 2005, at 18:08:46

In reply to Completely hysterical laughter! (nm), posted by crazy teresa on August 5, 2005, at 17:35:58

 

Lou's response to-- yes, Lou, it is about you-info

Posted by Lou Pilder on August 5, 2005, at 18:50:14

In reply to Lou's response to-- yes, Lou, it is about you-scpg, posted by Lou Pilder on August 5, 2005, at 16:39:22

Friends,
I am requesting that if you are going to respond to this thread that you read the following link.
The link writes about scapegoating and is from a group that deals with these type of issues on the mental- health level. It is non proffit and I am not endorsing what they write or advocating that you join the group. I am requesting that if you are going to post to this thread that you read the link for discussional purposes.
Lou
http://www.scapegoat.demon.co.uk/

 

Then I need to laugh more! (nm) » AuntieMel

Posted by crazy teresa on August 5, 2005, at 21:13:11

In reply to Re: And good for the abs, too (nm) » crazy teresa, posted by AuntieMel on August 5, 2005, at 18:08:46

 

I concur and well said (nm) » Racer

Posted by sleepygirl on August 5, 2005, at 21:14:33

In reply to Dr Bob -- yes, Lou, it is about you this time, posted by Racer on August 4, 2005, at 22:58:40

 

stands and applauds Racer! (nm)

Posted by spriggy on August 5, 2005, at 23:29:29

In reply to I concur and well said (nm) » Racer, posted by sleepygirl on August 5, 2005, at 21:14:33

 

Re: Lou's response to-- yes, Lou, it is about you-

Posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 0:09:23

In reply to Lou's response to-- yes, Lou, it is about you-info, posted by Lou Pilder on August 5, 2005, at 18:50:14


Lou, have you ever heard of a self fulfilling prophecy? I request that you consider that (maybe do some internet research).

I think these exaggerated analogies are undermining what might otherwise be a point that people could understand. I know people have said this to you before, Lou, but talking about your feelings would probably get you a lot more satisfaction.

I'm guessing you either cannot talk about your feelings or prefer the antagonism of the current situation. In either case, I imagine it's pretty lonely.

 

Re: Lou's response to Sarah T's post-whodoyu?

Posted by Sarah T. on August 6, 2005, at 0:52:17

In reply to Lou's response to Sarah T's post-whodoyu?, posted by Lou Pilder on August 5, 2005, at 1:04:13

> > >If so, it is not my intention to > Lou>

It would be a good idea to explore your intent with your psychiatrist. Is your psychiatrist aware of your participation in Psychobabble? Do you discuss the content and quantity of your posts with your psychiatrist?

Most of the people I've met here acknowledge that they suffer from mental illness. We come here to find ways to treat and/or overcome our emotional and physical pain. Most of us share with each other our experiences with various medications and our experiences in talk therapy. We do this because, as trite as it may sound, life really is short, and we want to live more productive, meaningful lives.

 

Re: blocked for week » Racer

Posted by Dr. Bob on August 7, 2005, at 23:28:28

In reply to Dr Bob -- yes, Lou, it is about you this time, posted by Racer on August 4, 2005, at 22:58:40

> sometimes it's just plain best for the group that ONE person is not permitted to continue disrupting the entire group.

Sorry, but please don't post anything that could lead others to feel accused. I've asked you to be civil before, so now I'm going to block you from posting for a week.

If you or others have questions about this or about posting policies in general, or are interested in alternative ways of expressing yourself, please see the FAQ:

http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#civil

Follow-ups regarding these issues, as well as replies to the above post, should of course themselves be civil.

> when I see that [my] Babble Buddies are upset by something that is written, I do tend to get a bit het up by it.

I understand, but supporting them is always an option...

> For the record, I believe that NikkiT has been an extraordinarily valuable member of this community for a very, very long time, and it upsets me that she can be hurt by Lou's posts so many times without your protection.

I believe that all members of this community are valuable. Unfortunately, it's sometimes hard for them to co-exist, and for me to protect them all.

> I believe it would ... be good for Lou to be asked to moderate his behavior in order to promote a bit more responsive to other people's feelings. Reality testing, if you want to think of it that way.

It's also reality that some things you cannot change...

Bob

 

Miss you Racer :-(

Posted by gardenergirl on August 8, 2005, at 23:35:58

In reply to Re: blocked for week » Racer, posted by Dr. Bob on August 7, 2005, at 23:28:28

You're now blocked and my T is on vacation.

sniff sniff

Oh wait, there's always the phone and email.

Joy!

Take care and come back soon.

gg

 

blocked for taking one for the troops

Posted by chemist on August 8, 2005, at 23:43:09

In reply to Re: blocked for week » Racer, posted by Dr. Bob on August 7, 2005, at 23:28:28

hello there, chemist here...while i cannot claim to know exactly who, what, or why exactly precipitated the discourse led by the estimable and pragmatic Racer: i am, naturally, compelled to comment...at length, of course...

i do applaud her will and determination in fighting the good fight, as it were, and hope that the good will - and good vibes - continue to flow, unabated, on PB and elsewhere...

in an entirely unrelated matter: just where *is* that darned pizza??!!

all the best, chemist

 

Re: blocked for taking one for the troops » chemist

Posted by wildcard on August 9, 2005, at 0:04:50

In reply to blocked for taking one for the troops, posted by chemist on August 8, 2005, at 23:43:09

she sure did and that shows character!! u should feel good about urself Racer!

 

Late but well said Racer. Miss you! (nm)

Posted by Phillipa on August 10, 2005, at 21:21:42

In reply to Re: blocked for taking one for the troops » chemist, posted by wildcard on August 9, 2005, at 0:04:50

 

Re: Late but well said Racer. Miss you!

Posted by ClearSkies on August 10, 2005, at 21:52:46

In reply to Late but well said Racer. Miss you! (nm), posted by Phillipa on August 10, 2005, at 21:21:42

Hear, hear!! Hope is it a speedy week.

 

Re: see you in a week » ClearSkies

Posted by alexandra_k on August 12, 2005, at 3:44:03

In reply to Re: Late but well said Racer. Miss you!, posted by ClearSkies on August 10, 2005, at 21:52:46

(or probably less by now...)

take care

 

Re: above for racer

Posted by alexandra_k on August 12, 2005, at 3:56:46

In reply to Re: see you in a week » ClearSkies, posted by alexandra_k on August 12, 2005, at 3:44:03

its been so long i guess ive forgotten how to post

:-O


This is the end of the thread.


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.