![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 25 of 27. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by so on July 18, 2005, at 13:10:02
The do not post to me rule on this site is nothing but a means for Hsiung to further intimidate and harrass guests he attracts to his site.It is practically impossible for any member to know who has asked them not to post to them. A person can bury the request in a message and the target of the baited message would have no way of knowing who has set them up for administrative escalation of their private harrassment.
I don't have a clue who is "crushedout" or when or why that person would have posted such a request to me. But this poster can join a thread claiming Myself and Lou Pilder have too much time on our hands, and use my response to the malicious attack to exclude my further involvement in the group.
Sharah T. and Crushed out were demonstrating pure unabated hatred in that thread. I don't think they should be blocked. Blocking is nothing but the idiosyncratic administrative choice imposed as an extension of Robert Hsiung's avoidant personality. SarahT. and Crushed out need to be confronted with their hatred in strong, clear language.
Sarah -- you were hateful to me and you need to consider why you choose to attack people. What is it about yourself you so hate that you take it out on others? Well congratulations. You got away with it. That's not creepy - it is sick. You are ill, Sarah, and you need to seek effective treatment from someone who won't compound your illness by encouraging you to escalate your symptomatic hatred.
Posted by gardenergirl on July 18, 2005, at 13:40:29
In reply to Rediculous do-not-post rule, posted by so on July 18, 2005, at 13:10:02
and join me in a giggle? :-D
I rather like watching buildings that are imploded by professionals. Not sure I've ever seen a building spontaneously implode, though.
((((SarahT)))))
gg
Posted by AuntieMel on July 18, 2005, at 13:54:57
In reply to SarahT...please consider the source..., posted by gardenergirl on July 18, 2005, at 13:40:29
Last time I saw a building implode spontaneously was in May '04.
I think there was a chimp involved.
Posted by so on July 18, 2005, at 13:58:11
In reply to SarahT...please consider the source..., posted by gardenergirl on July 18, 2005, at 13:40:29
> and join me in a giggle? :-D
>Why would you find satisfaction watching a person self-destruct, if that is what you think you are seeing.
You need to think long and hard about that question and contemplate how this site has exasperate the hatred you learned as a child.
> I rather like watching buildings that are imploded by professionals. Not sure I've ever seen a building spontaneously implode, though.
>
> ((((SarahT)))))
>
> gg
Posted by crushedout on July 18, 2005, at 14:12:15
In reply to Re: I have GG » gardenergirl, posted by AuntieMel on July 18, 2005, at 13:54:57
hee. that's funny if so. (no pun intended. i swear.)
Posted by gardenergirl on July 18, 2005, at 14:20:39
In reply to Re: SarahT...please consider gardnergirls illness » gardenergirl, posted by so on July 18, 2005, at 13:58:11
> You need to think long and hard about that question and contemplate how this site has exasperate the hatred you learned as a child.
Actually, I have no such need. Perhaps you need me to?
And um, are you a sibling or something? Childhood friend or neighbor? Holy cow, are you my T? If so, I better set some things straight, pronto.
Oh my, I just read your subject line. How could you possibly know I am ill today? Did you also attend the picnic and eat something yucky? Hmm, more circumstantial evidence that you could be my T, because I did have to cancel today. Oh lordy, are you my mother???????????
shudders
gg
>
>
>
Posted by so on July 18, 2005, at 14:48:57
In reply to Re: SarahT...please consider gardnergirls illness » so, posted by gardenergirl on July 18, 2005, at 14:20:39
> > You need to think long and hard about that question and contemplate how this site has exasperate the hatred you learned as a child.
>
> Actually, I have no such need. Perhaps you need me to?
>
> And um, are you a sibling or something? Childhood friend or neighbor? Holy cow, are you my T? If so, I better set some things straight, pronto.
>
> Oh my, I just read your subject line. How could you possibly know I am ill today? Did you also attend the picnic and eat something yucky? Hmm, more circumstantial evidence that you could be my T, because I did have to cancel today. Oh lordy, are you my mother???????????No, I'm just an experienced forensic reader.
> shudders
>
> gg
> >
> >
> >
Posted by AuntieMel on July 18, 2005, at 17:29:41
In reply to am i the chimp? » AuntieMel, posted by crushedout on July 18, 2005, at 14:12:15
I don't think so. I mean, I don't think you are.
Posted by crushedout on July 18, 2005, at 17:45:11
In reply to Re: am i the chimp? » crushedout, posted by AuntieMel on July 18, 2005, at 17:29:41
hmm, maybe i'm just a wafer-thin mint. :)
Posted by gardenergirl on July 18, 2005, at 18:28:57
In reply to Re: am i the chimp? » AuntieMel, posted by crushedout on July 18, 2005, at 17:45:11
>
> hmm, maybe i'm just a wafer-thin mint. :)Darn it! I just took a sip of ginger ale before I opened this. And of course I snorted!
Darn you, crushed! :-D
gg
Posted by crushedout on July 18, 2005, at 18:37:41
In reply to Re: am i the chimp? » crushedout, posted by gardenergirl on July 18, 2005, at 18:28:57
sorry, gg! next time, remember, never sip before opening a post from me.especially not on days when i wake up silly, like this one. maybe we need silly-trigger warnings.
:)
Posted by gardenergirl on July 18, 2005, at 18:45:22
In reply to Re: am i the chimp? (silly-trigger -- no sipping!) » gardenergirl, posted by crushedout on July 18, 2005, at 18:37:41
Posted by Dinah on July 18, 2005, at 19:20:38
In reply to Re: am i the chimp? (silly-trigger -- no sipping!) » gardenergirl, posted by crushedout on July 18, 2005, at 18:37:41
around lately.
Maybe I'm naive.
Posted by gabbii on July 18, 2005, at 19:24:57
In reply to I don't believe I've seen any Chimps, posted by Dinah on July 18, 2005, at 19:20:38
> around lately.
>
> Maybe I'm naive.I don't think so either I'm 100% Positive.
For many reasons.
Posted by Dinah on July 18, 2005, at 19:27:10
In reply to Re: I don't believe I've seen any Chimps, posted by gabbii on July 18, 2005, at 19:24:57
Posted by gardenergirl on July 18, 2005, at 19:27:57
In reply to Re: I don't believe I've seen any Chimps, posted by gabbii on July 18, 2005, at 19:24:57
I agree
Posted by annierose on July 18, 2005, at 19:36:35
In reply to Re: I don't believe I've seen any Chimps, posted by gardenergirl on July 18, 2005, at 19:27:57
Posted by crushedout on July 18, 2005, at 21:18:24
In reply to Re: I don't believe I've seen any Chimps, posted by gardenergirl on July 18, 2005, at 19:27:57
if you guys are absolving me of being criminally "insance," i am very relieved and happy.
Posted by gardenergirl on July 18, 2005, at 23:17:35
In reply to Re: I don't believe I've seen any Chimps, posted by crushedout on July 18, 2005, at 21:18:24
Wish we had a spell check that checked the whole post versus only words you check yourself.
:-D
gg
Posted by AuntieMel on July 18, 2005, at 23:34:59
In reply to Re: I don't believe I've seen any Chimps, posted by gardenergirl on July 18, 2005, at 19:27:57
No, I think there are no chimps here.
I was just fondly remembering one.
<you can snort now, gg>
Posted by gardenergirl on July 18, 2005, at 23:54:28
In reply to Re: Nope, no chimps here » gardenergirl, posted by AuntieMel on July 18, 2005, at 23:34:59
Thanks for the snort warning...safe snorting ahead.
gg
Posted by chemist on July 19, 2005, at 0:30:00
In reply to Re: Nope, no chimps here » gardenergirl, posted by AuntieMel on July 18, 2005, at 23:34:59
Posted by Sarah T. on July 19, 2005, at 0:45:29
In reply to SarahT...please consider the source..., posted by gardenergirl on July 18, 2005, at 13:40:29
Hi there, GG,
Thanks so much for your advice and kind words. Perhaps someday, he (or she) will be able to discuss this incident in therapy and learn something from it. Those over-reactions are very revealing and yield so many clues as to what's ailing us.
Good night.
Sarah
Posted by Sarah T. on July 19, 2005, at 0:55:39
In reply to did SOmebody forget to take their meds today? (nm), posted by chemist on July 19, 2005, at 0:30:00
Hi, Chemist. Either someone didn't take their meds, or Le Chatelier took a leave of absence. Today Psychobabble was governed by Heisenberg and his Uncertainty Principle.
Posted by Phillipa on July 19, 2005, at 22:48:27
In reply to Move over, Le Chatelier! » chemist, posted by Sarah T. on July 19, 2005, at 0:55:39
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.