![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 68 to 92 of 224. Go back in thread:
Posted by Dinah on February 22, 2005, at 9:37:52
In reply to Re: preliminary PBC, posted by Dr. Bob on February 17, 2005, at 22:57:52
Dr. Bob
Yes, it is true that once a person has been PBC'd or blocked for any reason whatsoever, their next violation for any reason can lead to the next administrative step.
And it is true that this was a volatile situation that you wanted put to rest.
However, you very frequently issue PBC's on a particular subject or a particular thread, without doing an automatic escalation just because someone has received a PBC or block in the past, on a different topic, or in a different situation. You did that on this thread, in fact.
I just wish you had done that for Bobby too.
Posted by Mark H. on February 22, 2005, at 15:08:19
In reply to Re: preliminary PBC » Dr. Bob, posted by Dinah on February 22, 2005, at 9:37:52
and I apologize to those who were blocked for stating their point of view.
Sincerely,
Mark H.
Posted by Jai Narayan on February 22, 2005, at 18:49:27
In reply to Re: I Regret Starting This Thread..., posted by Mark H. on February 22, 2005, at 15:08:19
Mark H. you are a dear to have compassion for those who are/were blocked.
I know setting something into motion and seeing that it has some hard consequences...
well it's painful.
but, my friend, we are adults on babble and can take responsibility for our actions and the reactions....
this is not your fault...
please don't take that on.
Ja*
Posted by Dr. Bob on February 22, 2005, at 22:27:36
In reply to Re: preliminary PBC » Dr. Bob, posted by Dinah on February 22, 2005, at 9:37:52
> you very frequently issue PBC's on a particular subject or a particular thread, without doing an automatic escalation just because someone has received a PBC or block in the past, on a different topic, or in a different situation.
Yes, and I wish I had felt able to do that this time, too...
Bob
Posted by alexandra_k on February 23, 2005, at 1:45:02
In reply to Re: preliminary PBC, posted by Dr. Bob on February 22, 2005, at 22:27:36
Posted by AuntieMel on February 23, 2005, at 7:57:06
In reply to Re: preliminary PBC, posted by Dr. Bob on February 22, 2005, at 22:27:36
Why didn't you think you could do that in this case?
Posted by 64bowtie on February 23, 2005, at 10:31:28
In reply to What Happened? Gender and the Perception of Threat, posted by Mark H. on February 16, 2005, at 17:23:41
...I was blocked or I would have thanked you sooner...
Rod
Posted by 64bowtie on February 23, 2005, at 11:10:27
In reply to Re: I Regret Starting This Thread..., posted by Mark H. on February 22, 2005, at 15:08:19
...thanx again. No apology necessary.
Mark,
Let's see if we can do better next time... Although my outer layers are all scorched and tattered from this affair, my inards are well intact.
I wouldn't wish this onto anyone! I am left with little or no integrity here at Babble. Its taken me 15 months to get as far as I got and now, POOF, all gone! I came to Babble in friendship and now I am leaving in flames; a mere cinder of my old self!
I would expect reasonable people to not recoil and revile me if I expressed any desire to savage and destroy any someone else. I would expect to be blocked first by those who can. Instead, here at Babble, the intended victim is blocked, allowing the savagery to continue. Hmmmmmm.....
I have to ask myself if this is an emotionally safe place to be. ...and, in my case as the intended victim, is it a wise business decision to stay here and just ignore the details?
I continue to seek those who are themselves seeking wellness (above all the clamor). If that appeals to you, please share how you go about it.
Rod
Posted by 64bowtie on February 23, 2005, at 11:22:23
All,
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050219/msgs/462231.html
I said, ...reasonable people [NOT] recoil and revile me...
That's a mistake...
I meant to say that, ...I expect that reasonable people [WOULD] recoil and revile me if I expressed desires to saveg and destroy someone...
Now, please reread the post with this change!
Its not a change of heart! Its a change of typing!!! I don't do good typing yet!
Rod
Posted by AuntieMel on February 23, 2005, at 13:43:45
In reply to Re: I Regret Starting This Thread... » Mark H., posted by 64bowtie on February 23, 2005, at 11:10:27
How about if we all move on? I wouldn't worry about integrity, you know - people *do* tend to forget if we let them.
Glad to have you back.
Posted by TamaraJ on February 23, 2005, at 13:50:35
In reply to Re: new day, new chapter » 64bowtie, posted by AuntieMel on February 23, 2005, at 13:43:45
The U.N. could use someone like you, or a prototype of you!
Posted by AuntieMel on February 23, 2005, at 15:15:11
In reply to AuntieMel - you are a blessing! » AuntieMel, posted by TamaraJ on February 23, 2005, at 13:50:35
That's so kind of you. It's just that I find very few things to be black and white. Sometimes that can be a curse.
Posted by Broken on February 23, 2005, at 15:15:47
In reply to AuntieMel - you are a blessing! » AuntieMel, posted by TamaraJ on February 23, 2005, at 13:50:35
I believe I stated the exact same thing to Auntie just a few days ago. It takes a special person to have that quality.
Posted by Dinah on February 23, 2005, at 16:46:58
In reply to Re: AuntieMel - you are a blessing!, posted by Broken on February 23, 2005, at 15:15:47
Posted by Dinah on February 23, 2005, at 16:57:31
In reply to Re: I Regret Starting This Thread... » Mark H., posted by 64bowtie on February 23, 2005, at 11:10:27
Your integrity is in fine shape. There's no need for you to leave. And I'm hoping we can just all put this behind us and move on (on Babble).
Posted by Dr. Bob on February 23, 2005, at 22:29:55
In reply to Re: I Regret Starting This Thread... » Mark H., posted by 64bowtie on February 23, 2005, at 11:10:27
> the intended victim is blocked, allowing the savagery to continue.
Sorry, but please don't post anything that could lead others to feel accused or put down. The time before last you were blocked for 4 weeks, so this time it's for 8.
If you or others have questions about this or about posting policies in general, or are interested in alternative ways of expressing yourself, please see the FAQ:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#civil
Follow-ups regarding these issues, as well as replies to the above post, should of course themselves be civil.
Thanks,
Bob
Posted by Dr. Bob on February 23, 2005, at 22:34:27
In reply to Re: preliminary PBC - I'm curious » Dr. Bob, posted by AuntieMel on February 23, 2005, at 7:57:06
> How about capping the length of blocks?
>
> alexandra_kThey *are* capped now, at 52 weeks.
> Why didn't you think you could do that in this case?
>
> AuntieMelAs Dinah said:
> this was a volatile situation that you wanted put to rest.
Bob
Posted by alexandra_k on February 23, 2005, at 23:06:44
In reply to Re: preliminary PBC, posted by Dr. Bob on February 23, 2005, at 22:34:27
One year?
I didn't know that.
That is a long time.I dunno.
Posted by AuntieMel on February 24, 2005, at 8:51:53
In reply to Re: AuntieMel - you are a blessing!, posted by Broken on February 23, 2005, at 15:15:47
Writing something (when there is time to think) is buckets easier than living it real time.
Posted by alexandra_k on February 24, 2005, at 12:58:38
In reply to Re: I'm blushing guys, but, posted by AuntieMel on February 24, 2005, at 8:51:53
> Writing something (when there is time to think) is buckets easier than living it real time.
Buckets easier, it is true.
But still plenty hard enough...
Posted by Dinah on February 24, 2005, at 13:38:04
In reply to Re: I'm blushing guys, but, posted by AuntieMel on February 24, 2005, at 8:51:53
Well, the hard part is taking time to think. :)
Posted by alexandra_k on February 24, 2005, at 14:23:56
In reply to Re: I'm blushing guys, but » AuntieMel, posted by Dinah on February 24, 2005, at 13:38:04
Or just leaving it alone sometimes...
Posted by alexandra_k on February 24, 2005, at 14:26:29
In reply to Re: preliminary PBC, posted by Dr. Bob on February 23, 2005, at 22:34:27
I still think one or maybe two months is a hell of a long time.
> > How about capping the length of blocks?
> >
> > alexandra_k
>
> They *are* capped now, at 52 weeks.
Posted by mair on February 24, 2005, at 17:05:56
In reply to Re: Isn't a year a bit excessive????? » Dr. Bob, posted by alexandra_k on February 24, 2005, at 14:26:29
..Particularly since the length of the block has everything to do with the number of times you've been blocked before, and generally nothing to do with the seriousness of the offense.
Mair
Posted by gardenergirl on February 24, 2005, at 19:25:40
In reply to Of course it is » alexandra_k, posted by mair on February 24, 2005, at 17:05:56
I wonder how many people even return to Babble after a block that long. Although I suppose people could lurk until their block was up.
gg
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.