Psycho-Babble Administration Thread 619

Shown: posts 74 to 98 of 129. Go back in thread:

 

Re: advertising Dr. Bob; James

Posted by Lorraine on March 25, 2001, at 19:10:26

In reply to Re: advertising James, posted by stjames on March 25, 2001, at 17:49:15

James:

Thought about what you wrote and revisited the list. Eliminated those that had hit or access charges. Then there were 11. Eliminated those with unlimited access. Then there were 3. Eliminated the cheapest. Then there were 2. Only Saturn Services and Host Genie were left standing at the end of the day. So forget the list I sent you and dr. bob earlier--only the two left standing deserve consideration.

The other thought would be to identify quality vendors that provide a discount to non-profits. Budgetweb.com allows you to specify "discount for non-profits" in your search. This would yield a different list from which a higher end host provider could be selected that offers a discount.

 

Re: advertising Dr. Bob; James

Posted by stjames on March 25, 2001, at 20:36:30

In reply to Re: advertising Dr. Bob; James, posted by Lorraine on March 25, 2001, at 19:10:26

Then there were 2. Only Saturn Services and Host Genie were left standing at the end of the day. So forget the list I sent you and dr. bob earlier--only the two left standing deserve consideration.
>

Great, i will start looking into these Monday straight away.

james

 

Re: advertising Dr. Bob; James

Posted by pat123 on March 26, 2001, at 10:51:04

In reply to Re: advertising Dr. Bob; James, posted by Lorraine on March 25, 2001, at 19:10:26

> James:
>
> Thought about what you wrote and revisited the list. Eliminated those that had hit or access charges. Then there were 11.

OK, new plan. My Jeep is fixed so I can get home
where I can work. I have not been home in a month.
So I can offer to do more in the help to find a host. I will try to come up with a list of hosts
I think will work and then we can discuss.

James, a/k/a Pat123

 

Re: evaluating web hosting options

Posted by Dr. Bob on March 27, 2001, at 0:39:26

In reply to Re: advertising, posted by stjames on March 25, 2001, at 1:34:34

> I would like to help by doing an analysis on some of these providers.

That would be great, thanks!

> So, would it be possible to cut that list down some ? Off the top of my head, the $50-100 range
> is reasonable; this would offer big savings
> and reasonable performance. I can also ask around
> about these hosting services; I would also sugest
> asking several people who host with the service what they think.

Here's my list again, with prices for each one. You can decide better than I which ones to look into:

DommelNetsolutions 22
Superior Hosting 35
HostGenie 48
1-877-Site.Com 52
Saturn Services 56
Zapgold.com 56
Century-Host 56
OChosting.com 57
1 Web Please 80
Digitalsea.net 110
DTS-NET 159
Jumpline 165
Hostview.com 167
Our Virtual Mall And Web Hosting 170
WebWrite Productions 171
Schogini Systems 178
Maikon 180
HiChina.com 199
Dreamhost Strictly Business 213
wantsomegetsome.net (!) 217
WestHost 223
Computer Solutions International 230
IIC Internet Services 239
Addr.com 266
Christian Site Hosting.com 273

Please, however, take into account, if you can, the quality of their support. I can call Verio, I can email Verio, Verio has a ton of help on their site:

http://vps.verio.com/support/virtual/freebsd.html

And they make installing a statistics program as easy as:

% vinstall webalizer
% rehash

> Some stats that I did not see on your page that would be helpful to know are total hits and bandwidth (megabytes/gigabytes a month) for the last 3 months.

Guess what? I have this new statistics program! :-) You can click on the month to get details:

http://www.dr-bob.org/stats

So far this month (ie, up until 25-Mar-2001 05:51 CST):

Total Hits: 1,528,225
Total KBytes: 20,770,392

It's probably bad luck, but since this has come up, I'm hoping Psycho-Babble will hit a million pages served this month. :-)

Bob

 

Re: what others could help me with

Posted by Dr. Bob on March 27, 2001, at 1:06:30

In reply to Re: what others could help me with, posted by pat123 on March 25, 2001, at 12:09:55

> > And what was it others could help you with, do you remember?
>
> Answering e-mail, questions, questions, questions from list people. This was a list serv to there were unsub/sub problems and bounced mail.

The registration questions that involve passwords and unposted email addresses I think I'm going to need to keep taking care of myself. The rest I suppose I could ask to be posted here. But it's not like there's tons of either. But every little bit would help.

> I let the list assistants remind folks about the subjects we did not dscuss, per the FAQ, this was a constant battle as we did not discuss religion.

I'm not sure I could delegate being the civility cop, either...

> converting docs to HTML and doing basic web work.

I'm not sure what you mean by "basic web work", but the really basic work here is all handled automatically by scripts. Thank goodness!

> It was nice to have a group of people who I could ger support from and bounce ideas off of. I could leave the list in their hands and take a holiday.

I get a lot of support right here, and ideas bouncing back to me, too. :-) But I take a laptop with me on holidays...

Bob

 

Re: what others could help me with

Posted by stjames on March 27, 2001, at 12:43:48

In reply to Re: what others could help me with, posted by Dr. Bob on March 27, 2001, at 1:06:30

> > I let the list assistants remind folks about the subjects we did not dscuss, per the FAQ, this was a constant battle as we did not discuss religion.
>
> I'm not sure I could delegate being the civility cop, either...

Correct, I just had assistants inform folks that
the FAQ says we do not discuss. I was the only one who was a "civility cop". The assistants also
helped people who did things like post the entire
original in their reply or other nubie things. The key words for the assistants were be nice and friendly, if someone was being unreasonable I delt with this. Only I took and gave the heat; the assistants really liked this !

James


 

Re: evaluating web hosting options

Posted by stjames on March 27, 2001, at 21:33:14

In reply to Re: evaluating web hosting options, posted by Dr. Bob on March 27, 2001, at 0:39:26

> So far this month (ie, up until 25-Mar-2001 05:51 CST):
>
> Total Hits: 1,528,225
> Total KBytes: 20,770,392
>

James here....

Wow ! Just to make sure, is this really 20.77 gigabytes ?

james

 

Re: A thought from a career Marketer

Posted by jb on March 29, 2001, at 1:23:36

In reply to Re: what others could help me with, posted by Dr. Bob on March 27, 2001, at 1:06:30

General advertising dollars are down, definitely, but I targeted dollars are actually up. Fewer advertisers are willing to pay Yahoo to host their site, as the click-through rate is horendously low, not to mention subsequent purchase rate. The problem is mainly with the general appeal websites, not a targeted site, such as this. Actually, Psychobabble is actually a very, very targeted site and, therefore, a marketers dream. Further, there is a potential to offer genuine benefit to users, as well as generate income for site maintenance and Dr. Bob's services. Some things which come to mind might be United States mail-order pharmacists (not the overseas stuff). A number already have websites, but they don't market themselves very well. Many PsychoBabble users could receive substantial benefit from lower cost prescription meds which their health insurers may not cover. Bookstores, such as Amazon, Borders, and Barnes & Noble are all other great ideas others have mentioned. Pharmaceutical companies may also be interested, somewhat in the same vein (excuse the pun)as their radio and tv dollars directed at the general public. Just think of the ad dollars we've all seen spent on Paxil. Also, I think there are ways to accomplish this while showing good taste and not detracting from users' experiences. That is, we should look for synergism among PsychoBabble and commercial interests.

I think the bottom line (another pun) is none of us should expect this excellent service to continue, indefinitely, without compensation from either ourselves, the users, or, something which I think we prefer, someone else. I think that someone else could be commercial interests or the government. And, I don't believe the Bush government is likely to ante up anytime soon.

JB

 

Re: mail-order pharmacies

Posted by Dr. Bob on March 29, 2001, at 11:03:52

In reply to Re: A thought from a career Marketer, posted by jb on March 29, 2001, at 1:23:36

> Some things which come to mind might be United States mail-order pharmacists (not the overseas stuff). A number already have websites, but they don't market themselves very well. Many PsychoBabble users could receive substantial benefit from lower cost prescription meds which their health insurers may not cover.

> we should look for synergism among PsychoBabble and commercial interests.

There's an idea! I had thought about drug companies, but not pharmacies... Is this something you could look into for me? :-)

Bob

 

Re: Pledge Week » Dr. Bob

Posted by ShelliR on March 29, 2001, at 11:46:15

In reply to Re: mail-order pharmacies, posted by Dr. Bob on March 29, 2001, at 11:03:52


I know this probably is not the final answer, but until something else is in place, why not try a pledge week. Pick a week in April (not Easter week) and announce, perhaps in red, that this is pledge week.
Make membership $25, but all donations are accepted. If you are able to set up a credit card service to pay, that would be great. If not have people sign up and then send a check. Spell out how for a $25 pledge, it is only costing about 14 cents a day for a membership.Each day, change the number of days left to pledge--i.e. six more days to pledge.....and announce how many people have pledged--the announcement of pledges seems to stimulate new pledges. You might even set up a goal--I think it gets everyone united to try to reach a goal.

I think it whould bring in some money now, so why not try?

Shelli

 

Re: mail-order pharmacies

Posted by stjames on March 29, 2001, at 12:34:53

In reply to Re: mail-order pharmacies, posted by Dr. Bob on March 29, 2001, at 11:03:52

> There's an idea! I had thought about drug companies, but not pharmacies... Is this something you could look into for me? :-)
>
> Bob

James here....

Hmm... the overseas pharmacies that don't require a script are of questionable legality (for the user). This would open liability issues, what happ-ens if someone is busted ? Is Br. Bob also on the hook for this. Even if you do have a script
and go overseas it is a grey legal area.

How about US mail order pharmacies ? This would be legal (100%) and offer a savings to us.

Contacting the drug companies is a great idea; they are already advertising to users and this board is very targeted for them.

james

 

Re: Pledge Week

Posted by Dr. Bob on March 29, 2001, at 22:33:46

In reply to Re: Pledge Week » Dr. Bob, posted by ShelliR on March 29, 2001, at 11:46:15

> I know this probably is not the final answer, but until something else is in place, why not try a pledge week.

Hmm, interesting idea. Would the site be otherwise closed, or would there just be no posting, or would it be business as usual during that week?

Bob

 

Re: mail-order pharmacies

Posted by Dr. Bob on March 29, 2001, at 22:42:40

In reply to Re: mail-order pharmacies, posted by stjames on March 29, 2001, at 12:34:53

> How about US mail order pharmacies ? This would be legal (100%) and offer a savings to us.

Right, that's what jb had in mind, I just didn't quote that part...

> Contacting the drug companies is a great idea; they are already advertising to users and this board is very targeted for them.

I used to think that, too, but (1) on the one hand, they have to be careful about seeming to support off-label uses, (2) on the other, what's posted here isn't always 100% pro-drug, and (3) advertisers may be anti-message board in general...

Hmm, (2) and (3) might also apply to mail-order pharmacies...

Bob

 

Re: Pledge Week

Posted by ShelliR on March 29, 2001, at 23:31:00

In reply to Re: Pledge Week, posted by Dr. Bob on March 29, 2001, at 22:33:46

> > I know this probably is not the final answer, but until something else is in place, why not try a pledge week.
>
> Hmm, interesting idea. Would the site be otherwise closed, or would there just be no posting, or would it be business as usual during that week?
>
> Bob

No, definitely business as usual; that's important, so people continue to come to the site and remember why they're going to contribute to it. Perhaps reminder banners (and perhaps a short (!) speech) when you log on. If you could create another page for people to submit their pledge that would be good; if you could accept credit cards that would be even better. Maybe the amount of the pledge should remain anonymous, but the list of pledgers should be visible as incentive. ShelliR

 

Re: Pledge Week:DrBob.

Posted by JahL on March 30, 2001, at 16:57:40

In reply to Re: Pledge Week, posted by ShelliR on March 29, 2001, at 23:31:00


> No, definitely business as usual; that's important, so people continue to come to the site and remember why they're going to contribute to it. Perhaps reminder banners (and perhaps a short (!) speech) when you log on. If you could create another page for people to submit their pledge that would be good; if you could accept credit cards that would be even better. Maybe the amount of the pledge should remain anonymous, but the list of pledgers should be visible as incentive.

Credit card facility is a must-contributing shld be made as easy & convenient as possible.

I would go one further & suggest a permanent CC click-on on the Support page. This wld make spontaneous donating easier. Say someone is finding Babble particularly helpful at a given time, they can make that donation while the 'moment' (ie emotional incentive) is still there.

J.

 

Re: Credit cards

Posted by Dr. Bob on March 31, 2001, at 2:17:28

In reply to Re: Pledge Week:DrBob., posted by JahL on March 30, 2001, at 16:57:40

> > No, definitely business as usual; that's important, so people continue to come to the site and remember why they're going to contribute to it.

Doesn't public radio cut back on programming? Not that this is so much like public radio...

> > Maybe the amount of the pledge should remain anonymous, but the list of pledgers should be visible as incentive.

Some people prefer to be anonymous, and the number (and total amount) of anonymous pledges could be tallied, so I think it would be OK to give people the choice.

> > if you could accept credit cards that would be even better.
>
> Credit card facility is a must

It looks like accepting credit cards might be much much easier now than it used to be. But I still think I should open a new bank account for that. And do my taxes. So it's still going to take some time, but probably not nearly as much as I was afraid...

Bob

 

Re: Credit cards » Dr. Bob

Posted by ShelliR on March 31, 2001, at 8:51:54

In reply to Re: Credit cards, posted by Dr. Bob on March 31, 2001, at 2:17:28

> > > No, definitely business as usual; that's important, so people continue to come to the site and remember why they're going to contribute to it.
>
> Doesn't public radio cut back on programming? Not that this is so much like public radio...
>
No public radio does the same programming during pledge drives, just cuts in several times during the show to ask for pledges and tell you why they're important etc. and how far they've come to meeting that hour's goal.

This year they've had a new thing, for two days during pledge week, they don't interrupt the shows, just tell you to go online to pledge
ShelliR

 

Re: Credit cards - privacy concerns

Posted by jb on March 31, 2001, at 13:33:41

In reply to Re: Credit cards, posted by Dr. Bob on March 31, 2001, at 2:17:28

> > > No, definitely business as usual; that's important, so people continue to come to the site and remember why they're going to contribute to it.
>
> Doesn't public radio cut back on programming? Not that this is so much like public radio...
>
> > > Maybe the amount of the pledge should remain anonymous, but the list of pledgers should be visible as incentive.
>
> Some people prefer to be anonymous, and the number (and total amount) of anonymous pledges could be tallied, so I think it would be OK to give people the choice.
>
> > > if you could accept credit cards that would be even better.
> >
> > Credit card facility is a must
>
> It looks like accepting credit cards might be much much easier now than it used to be. But I still think I should open a new bank account for that. And do my taxes. So it's still going to take some time, but probably not nearly as much as I was afraid...
>
> Bob

A couple of potential concerns -

(1)Married individuals or those otherwise living together, etc., may not want to explain the why/how, etc. of their participation in Psychobabble, upon the spouses or significant other opening of the credit card bill.

(2)Credit cards leave a "trail," and some people may not want their participation to potentially "leak out" due to that medium.

(3)New visitors may first want to experience the site for a certain period of time in order to understand the benefit and monetarily support the service. I realize you could time limit the free membership, as a "trial membership." However, it is another thing to think about.

JB

 

Re: Credit cards - privacy concerns

Posted by Dr. Bob on March 31, 2001, at 14:03:44

In reply to Re: Credit cards - privacy concerns, posted by jb on March 31, 2001, at 13:33:41

> (1)Married individuals or those otherwise living together, etc., may not want to explain the why/how, etc. of their participation in Psychobabble
>
> (2)Credit cards leave a "trail," and some people may not want their participation to potentially "leak out" due to that medium.

I agree, those are drawbacks.

> (3)New visitors may first want to experience the site for a certain period of time in order to understand the benefit and monetarily support the service. I realize you could time limit the free membership, as a "trial membership."

Right, that's what I was thinking...

Bob

 

Re: Credit cards - privacy concerns

Posted by pandora on March 31, 2001, at 15:00:02

In reply to Re: Credit cards - privacy concerns, posted by Dr. Bob on March 31, 2001, at 14:03:44

> (3)New visitors may first want to experience the site for a certain period of time in order to understand the benefit and monetarily support the service. I realize you could time limit the free membership, as a "trial membership."


So, are you now thinking of making this as membership fee rather than a voluntary pledge drive?

 

Re: Credit cards - privacy concerns » Dr. Bob

Posted by ShelliR on March 31, 2001, at 15:06:33

In reply to Re: Credit cards - privacy concerns, posted by Dr. Bob on March 31, 2001, at 14:03:44

> > (3)New visitors may first want to experience the site for a certain period of time in order to understand the benefit and monetarily support the service. I realize you could time limit the free membership, as a "trial membership."
>
> Right, that's what I was thinking...
>
> Bob

WAIT A SECOND.... what is this about temporary memberships for a period of time? This is sounding more like you must eventually be a member. That is not in keeping with a pledge drive. If you don't pledge on public radio, you can still listen, participate; it is up to you and your conscience. When I suggested a pledge drive, I had in mind that all donations should be voluntary, not that psychobabble would now start to charge a mandatory membership fee.

That would upset me a lot because I think the entire flow of your website would change, be more limited, turn away people who by now have gotten used to full participation on the internet without fees. We do pay (most of us) to get our connection to the internet, but I have never been forced to pay for any services. I don't like that precedent at all. What happens if you are censored? Do you get back your membership fee? With a voluntary contribution, that is not an issue, because you chose to give. What if people hold back writing a message because: "oh, it's my fifth message and after this I have to pay and I'm still not sure if I want to." What if someone leaves for a few months and then comes back? Who wants to keep track of all that minutia?

I am willing to give money, but don't think I want to participate if I MUST give money. I don't want to be on a board with paid membership only--like belonging to a limited club. Also right now, Dr. Bob, you have a lot of power on the board, which is fine with me. But it I had to pay for membership, it might not be fine with me. Somehow donating to psychobabble feels fine to me, but being forced to join and pay a fee does not.

As to the privacy of credit cards, one doesn't have to pay by credit card. One can pledge money then send a check or a cashier's check. Credit cards are just one option to make payment easier.

Gosh, if this is turning into forced payment, then I'm sorry I mentioned a pledge drive.

ShelliR

 

Re: Credit cards - privacy concerns

Posted by JahL on March 31, 2001, at 15:19:25

In reply to Re: Credit cards - privacy concerns, posted by pandora on March 31, 2001, at 15:00:02

> > (3)New visitors may first want to experience the site for a certain period of time in order to understand the benefit and monetarily support the service. I realize you could time limit the free membership, as a "trial membership."
>
>
> So, are you now thinking of making this as membership fee rather than a voluntary pledge drive?

Yeah. I thought we were talking voluntary donations. I thought the impracticalities & drawbacks of a membership system were covered a while ago...(eg what incentive would say, a CamW have to enrol?)

The CC facility I mentioned would be no more than a convenient *option*, in addition to cheques, money orders etc. If someone's worried about security then they shouldn't use the CC option. Simple as that.

J.

 

Re: Agree w/Shelli(np)

Posted by JahL on March 31, 2001, at 15:26:10

In reply to Re: Credit cards - privacy concerns » Dr. Bob, posted by ShelliR on March 31, 2001, at 15:06:33

.

 

Re: membership fees rather than voluntary pledges

Posted by Dr. Bob on April 1, 2001, at 16:02:50

In reply to Re: Credit cards - privacy concerns, posted by pandora on March 31, 2001, at 15:00:02

> So, are you now thinking of making this as membership fee rather than a voluntary pledge drive?

What I'm trying to do is keep an open mind...

Bob

 

Re: membership fee idea

Posted by Dr. Bob on April 1, 2001, at 16:33:40

In reply to Re: Credit cards - privacy concerns » Dr. Bob, posted by ShelliR on March 31, 2001, at 15:06:33

> WAIT A SECOND.... what is this about temporary memberships for a period of time? This is sounding more like you must eventually be a member. That is not in keeping with a pledge drive. If you don't pledge on public radio, you can still listen, participate; it is up to you and your conscience.

It's also up to how successful the pledge drive is...

> When I suggested a pledge drive, I had in mind that all donations should be voluntary, not that psychobabble would now start to charge a mandatory membership fee.

I know, this is something separate, which I've been thinking about for a while. It's never been a popular idea, which I guess I understand, but I think I can make it palatable. Although I might need to hire a PR firm...

> That would upset me a lot because I think the entire flow of your website would change, be more limited, turn away people who by now have gotten used to full participation on the internet without fees. We do pay (most of us) to get our connection to the internet, but I have never been forced to pay for any services. What happens if you are censored? Do you get back your membership fee? What if someone leaves for a few months and then comes back? Who wants to keep track of all that minutia?

It would be a change, and some people might be turned away, yes. No one would be *forced* to pay anything, of course...

Probably if people were blocked, they wouldn't get a refund. It would be an extra incentive to be civil. One of the reasons to do it, BTW, is to make it easier for me to *keep* disruptive people blocked.

The server would keep track of everything, it's good at that. :-)

> Also right now, Dr. Bob, you have a lot of power on the board, which is fine with me. But it I had to pay for membership, it might not be fine with me.

Can you say more about that?

> Gosh, if this is turning into forced payment, then I'm sorry I mentioned a pledge drive.

Again, this goes back a long time, it wouldn't be your fault.

--------

> I thought the impracticalities & drawbacks of a membership system were covered a while ago...(eg what incentive would say, a CamW have to enrol?)

Good question. What incentives could there be? :-)

Bob


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.