![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 9 to 33 of 33. Go back in thread:
Posted by Raisinb on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:31
In reply to Re: New med advice? (sorry, long post!) » kagome, posted by Phillipa on March 10, 2012, at 12:25:48
Posted by TiredofChemicals on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:31
In reply to My .02 guys: don't feed the troll. (nm), posted by Raisinb on March 21, 2012, at 7:45:45
I take issue with that statement even though I didn't want to further interfere with this original posters contribution.
Lou's contributions to my better health were minimal but helped me to be skeptical at times regarding "medications."
You see, these "medications" caused a life ruining condition in me that I deal with daily. I have a neurologists confirmation that psychiatric drugs were the cause of this physical malady.
I am no longer on these "medications" although I refer to them as chemicals now and I am living a better life.
I will contribute more soon and share my 10 year experience and merry-go-round with psychiatric medications. The same merry-go-round that I see many here experiencing.
I believe Lou's contributions have purpose and, at the very least, may have played a small role in saving my life. That is significant enough for me.
Posted by Oioioi123 on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:32
In reply to Re: My .02 guys: don't feed the troll., posted by TiredofChemicals on March 21, 2012, at 16:48:07
Your the only one on this whole site then because everyone is sick and tired of his psychotic rants. And him giving advice when it's not wanted. There's a time and a place for the type of advice he wants to give and he's being very inappropriate with it. People are here asking an looking for advice on medication, not to be spammed with propaganda on why medicine is evil and shouldn't be used. He needs to find the appropriate forum to vent or know when someone is looking for that kind of advice. I'm sorry you cannot see this, everyone else on the forum can
Posted by TiredofChemicals on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:32
In reply to Re: My .02 guys: don't feed the troll., posted by Oioioi123 on March 21, 2012, at 16:57:05
> Your the only one on this whole site then because everyone is sick and tired of his psychotic rants. And him giving advice when it's not wanted. There's a time and a place for the type of advice he wants to give and he's being very inappropriate with it. People are here asking an looking for advice on medication, not to be spammed with propaganda on why medicine is evil and shouldn't be used. He needs to find the appropriate forum to vent or know when someone is looking for that kind of advice. I'm sorry you cannot see this, everyone else on the forum can
Sorry, I actually didn't read the original posters
contribution. I jumped in without looking back and I apologise. I will try to be more vigilant in the future.
Posted by Raisinb on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:32
In reply to Re: My .02 guys: don't feed the troll., posted by Oioioi123 on March 21, 2012, at 16:57:05
No, I agree with you. My point. Is, he *may* be a troll--ie, one who gets off on provoking anger in others. He would certainly be labeled one in most other forums. Here, people are more vulnerable and honest, and thus perhaps too quick to respond to others seriously, when those others may be just trolling.
Posted by Lou Pilder on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:33
In reply to Lou's request-kumntyofdhth, posted by Lou Pilder on March 19, 2012, at 19:54:45
> Friends,
> I am requesting that you click on the following link and there is a link there. I intend to develop an exposition that covers the aspects in this thread, unless the rule of 3 applies.
> Lou
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20110902/msgs/996161.htmlFriends,
There is a lot that I come here to reveal to you. You that are wanting to make a more informed decision as to take mind-altering drugs that can kill you or give you a life-ruining condition or addiction. You that are thinkinng about having your child be given mind-altering drugs. You that are considering taking mind-altering drugs while pregnabt. You that are tring to make a decision as to if your condition is actually caused by psychotropic drugs. You that are wanting to know a {way out} from the shackles of addiction and depression. You that want a new life to sing a new song.
I have come here to share a revelation that I have been shown that there is a thing called {captivity}. This captivity has been revealed to me to be a force and a power. A force and power that wants death. This force lives on death. I have come here to tell you how you could lead captivity captive, and have peace and joy and that death could have no power over you. You could live forever and death would have no sting. For it has been revealed to me that death is an enemy. And the enemy can be conquered.
Here is a video that shows some things that I am requesting that you consider. It is about that the FDA has agreed that antidepressants can increase suicidality. And a doctor explainns whgat the drug companies that make the drugs did with what they knew.
My friends, there is a way out of suicidlity, but Mr. Hsiunng has posted a prohibition to me here so that I can not post that for you here.
Lou
To see this video:
A. pull up Google
B. Type in:
[youtube, Peter Breggin Antidepressant testimony]
Usually first...posted on Jan 13 2012....time is 3 min
Posted by Raisinb on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:33
In reply to Re: My .02 guys: don't feed the troll., posted by TiredofChemicals on March 21, 2012, at 16:48:07
That's really good, the point of these boards is for people to help each other. However, this is a medication board. Anti-med posts should probably go on the alternative board. Posting inflammatory stuff that's contradictory to the purpose of the board looks kind of like...what they call trollin'.
Posted by Lou Pilder on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:33
In reply to : Lou's request-phuldhawul, posted by Lou Pilder on March 21, 2012, at 20:48:41
> > Friends,
> > I am requesting that you click on the following link and there is a link there. I intend to develop an exposition that covers the aspects in this thread, unless the rule of 3 applies.
> > Lou
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20110902/msgs/996161.html
>
> Friends,
> There is a lot that I come here to reveal to you. You that are wanting to make a more informed decision as to take mind-altering drugs that can kill you or give you a life-ruining condition or addiction. You that are thinkinng about having your child be given mind-altering drugs. You that are considering taking mind-altering drugs while pregnabt. You that are tring to make a decision as to if your condition is actually caused by psychotropic drugs. You that are wanting to know a {way out} from the shackles of addiction and depression. You that want a new life to sing a new song.
> I have come here to share a revelation that I have been shown that there is a thing called {captivity}. This captivity has been revealed to me to be a force and a power. A force and power that wants death. This force lives on death. I have come here to tell you how you could lead captivity captive, and have peace and joy and that death could have no power over you. You could live forever and death would have no sting. For it has been revealed to me that death is an enemy. And the enemy can be conquered.
> Here is a video that shows some things that I am requesting that you consider. It is about that the FDA has agreed that antidepressants can increase suicidality. And a doctor explainns whgat the drug companies that make the drugs did with what they knew.
> My friends, there is a way out of suicidlity, but Mr. Hsiunng has posted a prohibition to me here so that I can not post that for you here.
> Lou
> To see this video:
> A. pull up Google
> B. Type in:
> [youtube, Peter Breggin Antidepressant testimony]
> Usually first...posted on Jan 13 2012....time is 3 minFriends,
Another thing that I am led here to reveal to you is as to what psychotropic drugs are as to some of their constituants. I'm talking about nerve-agents, insecticides, chemical dyes and poison gas. And what they were used for and who made them for what? And Mr. Hsiung has posted to me a prohibition that eliminates what I can post about that which IMHO could save your life or prevent you from getting a life-ruining condition or addiction.
I come here to show you the statistics on suicide and death from heart attacks and such from these drugs. Statistics that could mark the difference between you having life or being dead, for the stats could be convinncing to you.
This forum indeed is about what Mr. Hsiung calls medications. And what comes from these drugs to the person's life is about the medications. It's about that there could be millions of deaths from these drugs going forward. Using the generally accepted amount of deaths last year from these drugs to be about 42,000, then even if that rate stays constant, millions of people could die from these drugs in the years ahead as 42,000 per year.
I am not anti-drug. I am anti-death
Lou
Posted by SLS on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:34
In reply to Lou's request-dhawgraytdhesptshun, posted by Lou Pilder on March 21, 2012, at 21:54:01
> Using the generally accepted amount of deaths last year from these drugs to be about 42,000
It is NOT generally accepted, and this fact was made clear by another poster, but you refused to respond to his post.
> then even if that rate stays constant, millions of people could die from these drugs in the years ahead as 42,000 per year.
You are repeating the same misinformation over and over. They are exaggerations, and have thus far not been supported by any citations you have produced.
Shall we investigate the validity of your words? Where did you get the idea that psychotropic drugs cause, by their actions, 42,000 deaths per year? Let's see what you use for sources of information. Let us remain focused on 42,000.
> I am not anti-drug. I am anti-death
Most all of us are anti-death, especially when it comes to our own. You are indeed anti-drug. This is not necessarily a bad thing in and of itself were you not to exaggerate, over-generalize, and perpetually propagate misinformation. Like I said, let's take a closer look at your 42,000 number, its interpretation, and the validity of its source.
- Scott
Posted by Lou Pilder on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:34
In reply to 42,000 » Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on March 22, 2012, at 2:59:19
> > Using the generally accepted amount of deaths last year from these drugs to be about 42,000
>
> It is NOT generally accepted, and this fact was made clear by another poster, but you refused to respond to his post.
>
> > then even if that rate stays constant, millions of people could die from these drugs in the years ahead as 42,000 per year.
>
> You are repeating the same misinformation over and over. They are exaggerations, and have thus far not been supported by any citations you have produced.
>
> Shall we investigate the validity of your words? Where did you get the idea that psychotropic drugs cause, by their actions, 42,000 deaths per year? Let's see what you use for sources of information. Let us remain focused on 42,000.
>
> > I am not anti-drug. I am anti-death
>
> Most all of us are anti-death, especially when it comes to our own. You are indeed anti-drug. This is not necessarily a bad thing in and of itself were you not to exaggerate, over-generalize, and perpetually propagate misinformation. Like I said, let's take a closer look at your 42,000 number, its interpretation, and the validity of its source.
>
>
> - ScottFriends,
There is a question here about the figure of 42,000 people that died last year as a result of psyychotropic drugs. And using that figure of 42,000 each year, going forward there could be a great multitude of people that are killed by psychotropic drugs including those that have died in the past from these drugs.
I have come here to reveal to you what has been revealed to me. It has been revealed to me that there is a strong delusion that Mr. Hsiung has posted to me a prohibition that prohibit me from posting that here. It could involve the foundation of Judaism as revealed to me which, Mr. Hsiung has posted to me a prohibition to not post here. IMHHHO, if I was not prohibited by Mr Hsiung to post that, there could be the potential for lives to be saved, people could escape a life-ruining conditions, people could overcome addiction and depression, and some of those that have been killed by psychotropic drugs could still be alive.
You see, psychotropic drugs can induce a mind-altered state in the one taking the drug to be compeled to kill themselves and/or others. These numbers of deaths are cataloged by the FDA and the CDC and other agencies. I have never seen the FDA or the other agencies deny the statistics concerning the number of deaths per year due to psychotropic drugs. You can go the their web site at FDA .gov.
Now in the revelation that I have received, I was taken to a place where there was a great multitude of people that died from these drugs, all crying out, why did you (redacted by respondent) and I saw the small and the great and they were cast (redacted by respondent). My friends, I have been writing here about death. But there is more than one type of death that has been revealed to me. There is a living death that one can be ressurected out from now, to a new life, and one could sing a new song.
Here is a video that I would like for those that are wanting to be in discussion here to view. If you could, then I think that the information in the link could help in this discussion to understand what could be unbeknownst to you.
Lou
To see this:
A. Pull up Google
B. Type in:
[youtube, Reversing depression without antidepressants-Articles-Mercola]
usually first
Posted by Lou Pilder on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:34
In reply to Lou's response-The great multitude » SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on March 22, 2012, at 6:54:14
> > > Using the generally accepted amount of deaths last year from these drugs to be about 42,000
> >
> > It is NOT generally accepted, and this fact was made clear by another poster, but you refused to respond to his post.
> >
> > > then even if that rate stays constant, millions of people could die from these drugs in the years ahead as 42,000 per year.
> >
> > You are repeating the same misinformation over and over. They are exaggerations, and have thus far not been supported by any citations you have produced.
> >
> > Shall we investigate the validity of your words? Where did you get the idea that psychotropic drugs cause, by their actions, 42,000 deaths per year? Let's see what you use for sources of information. Let us remain focused on 42,000.
> >
> > > I am not anti-drug. I am anti-death
> >
> > Most all of us are anti-death, especially when it comes to our own. You are indeed anti-drug. This is not necessarily a bad thing in and of itself were you not to exaggerate, over-generalize, and perpetually propagate misinformation. Like I said, let's take a closer look at your 42,000 number, its interpretation, and the validity of its source.
> >
> >
> > - Scott
>
> Friends,
> There is a question here about the figure of 42,000 people that died last year as a result of psyychotropic drugs. And using that figure of 42,000 each year, going forward there could be a great multitude of people that are killed by psychotropic drugs including those that have died in the past from these drugs.
> I have come here to reveal to you what has been revealed to me. It has been revealed to me that there is a strong delusion that Mr. Hsiung has posted to me a prohibition that prohibit me from posting that here. It could involve the foundation of Judaism as revealed to me which, Mr. Hsiung has posted to me a prohibition to not post here. IMHHHO, if I was not prohibited by Mr Hsiung to post that, there could be the potential for lives to be saved, people could escape a life-ruining conditions, people could overcome addiction and depression, and some of those that have been killed by psychotropic drugs could still be alive.
> You see, psychotropic drugs can induce a mind-altered state in the one taking the drug to be compeled to kill themselves and/or others. These numbers of deaths are cataloged by the FDA and the CDC and other agencies. I have never seen the FDA or the other agencies deny the statistics concerning the number of deaths per year due to psychotropic drugs. You can go the their web site at FDA .gov.
> Now in the revelation that I have received, I was taken to a place where there was a great multitude of people that died from these drugs, all crying out, why did you (redacted by respondent) and I saw the small and the great and they were cast (redacted by respondent). My friends, I have been writing here about death. But there is more than one type of death that has been revealed to me. There is a living death that one can be ressurected out from now, to a new life, and one could sing a new song.
> Here is a video that I would like for those that are wanting to be in discussion here to view. If you could, then I think that the information in the link could help in this discussion to understand what could be unbeknownst to you.
> Lou
> To see this:
> A. Pull up Google
> B. Type in:
> [youtube, Reversing depression without antidepressants-Articles-Mercola]
> usually first
>Friends,
There has been great research on the mechanism that the psychotropic drugs uses to kill. The drugs induce a mind-altered state to compel the taker of the drug to want to kill themselves and/or others, even commit mass-murder.
Thiis mechanism has been used as evidence in courts of law and has been accepted in verdicts amd now the FDA has a black-box warning that these drugs with that warning can increase suicidal thinking. I think from my perspective that the increase in suicidal thinking from these drugs is greater in children and I intend to later explain that unless the rule of 3 applies.
Here is a video where a doctor explains how the drugs cause one to be compeled to want to kill themselves and/or others.
To see this video:
A. Pull up Google
B. Type in:
[youtube, Can Antidepressants cause Violence?, Dr Moira Dolan]
Posted on May 8 2007... time is 10 min
Here is another video
To see what the chidren have had done to them, then you could think in your minds as to if or if not their blood will be upon whom.
To see this video:
A. Pull up Google
B. Type in:
[20/20 from ABC News: Foster kids prescribed psychotropic drugs]
Posted by Emily Elizabeth on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:35
In reply to Lou's response- How the drugs kill, posted by Lou Pilder on March 22, 2012, at 7:58:44
Posted by Oioioi123 on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:35
In reply to And it's DOCTOR Hsiung! (nm) » Lou Pilder, posted by Emily Elizabeth on March 22, 2012, at 20:46:15
Huh? What are you implying?
Posted by Emily Elizabeth on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:35
In reply to Re: And it's DOCTOR Hsiung!, posted by Oioioi123 on March 22, 2012, at 20:52:04
Lou insists on referring to him Mr. rather than Dr. It is extremely disrespectful.
EE
Posted by sigismund on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:36
In reply to Re: And it's DOCTOR Hsiung!, posted by Emily Elizabeth on March 22, 2012, at 21:46:43
>Lou insists on referring to him Mr. rather than Dr. It is extremely disrespectful.
Well that is certainly food for thought.
Posted by SLS on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:36
In reply to And it's DOCTOR Hsiung! (nm) » Lou Pilder, posted by Emily Elizabeth on March 22, 2012, at 20:46:15
Yes. I agree.
- Scott
Posted by Lou Pilder on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:36
In reply to Lou's response- How the drugs kill, posted by Lou Pilder on March 22, 2012, at 7:58:44
> > > > Using the generally accepted amount of deaths last year from these drugs to be about 42,000
> > >
> > > It is NOT generally accepted, and this fact was made clear by another poster, but you refused to respond to his post.
> > >
> > > > then even if that rate stays constant, millions of people could die from these drugs in the years ahead as 42,000 per year.
> > >
> > > You are repeating the same misinformation over and over. They are exaggerations, and have thus far not been supported by any citations you have produced.
> > >
> > > Shall we investigate the validity of your words? Where did you get the idea that psychotropic drugs cause, by their actions, 42,000 deaths per year? Let's see what you use for sources of information. Let us remain focused on 42,000.
> > >
> > > > I am not anti-drug. I am anti-death
> > >
> > > Most all of us are anti-death, especially when it comes to our own. You are indeed anti-drug. This is not necessarily a bad thing in and of itself were you not to exaggerate, over-generalize, and perpetually propagate misinformation. Like I said, let's take a closer look at your 42,000 number, its interpretation, and the validity of its source.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Scott
> >
> > Friends,
> > There is a question here about the figure of 42,000 people that died last year as a result of psyychotropic drugs. And using that figure of 42,000 each year, going forward there could be a great multitude of people that are killed by psychotropic drugs including those that have died in the past from these drugs.
> > I have come here to reveal to you what has been revealed to me. It has been revealed to me that there is a strong delusion that Mr. Hsiung has posted to me a prohibition that prohibit me from posting that here. It could involve the foundation of Judaism as revealed to me which, Mr. Hsiung has posted to me a prohibition to not post here. IMHHHO, if I was not prohibited by Mr Hsiung to post that, there could be the potential for lives to be saved, people could escape a life-ruining conditions, people could overcome addiction and depression, and some of those that have been killed by psychotropic drugs could still be alive.
> > You see, psychotropic drugs can induce a mind-altered state in the one taking the drug to be compeled to kill themselves and/or others. These numbers of deaths are cataloged by the FDA and the CDC and other agencies. I have never seen the FDA or the other agencies deny the statistics concerning the number of deaths per year due to psychotropic drugs. You can go the their web site at FDA .gov.
> > Now in the revelation that I have received, I was taken to a place where there was a great multitude of people that died from these drugs, all crying out, why did you (redacted by respondent) and I saw the small and the great and they were cast (redacted by respondent). My friends, I have been writing here about death. But there is more than one type of death that has been revealed to me. There is a living death that one can be ressurected out from now, to a new life, and one could sing a new song.
> > Here is a video that I would like for those that are wanting to be in discussion here to view. If you could, then I think that the information in the link could help in this discussion to understand what could be unbeknownst to you.
> > Lou
> > To see this:
> > A. Pull up Google
> > B. Type in:
> > [youtube, Reversing depression without antidepressants-Articles-Mercola]
> > usually first
> >
>
> Friends,
> There has been great research on the mechanism that the psychotropic drugs uses to kill. The drugs induce a mind-altered state to compel the taker of the drug to want to kill themselves and/or others, even commit mass-murder.
> Thiis mechanism has been used as evidence in courts of law and has been accepted in verdicts amd now the FDA has a black-box warning that these drugs with that warning can increase suicidal thinking. I think from my perspective that the increase in suicidal thinking from these drugs is greater in children and I intend to later explain that unless the rule of 3 applies.
> Here is a video where a doctor explains how the drugs cause one to be compeled to want to kill themselves and/or others.
> To see this video:
> A. Pull up Google
> B. Type in:
> [youtube, Can Antidepressants cause Violence?, Dr Moira Dolan]
> Posted on May 8 2007... time is 10 min
> Here is another video
> To see what the chidren have had done to them, then you could think in your minds as to if or if not their blood will be upon whom.
> To see this video:
> A. Pull up Google
> B. Type in:
> [20/20 from ABC News: Foster kids prescribed psychotropic drugs]Friends,
I have come here to reveal to you what death is as revealed to me. You see, there are different types of death as revealed to me, the physical, the spiritual and what is known as Eternal Death
We are in discussion here about the 42,000 number used that is generally accepted as the average number of people that are killed each year by one way or another from psychotropic drugs. Be advised, that there are those that think that the real number of deaths is 100 times that, for not all deaths are reported as deaths from psychotropic drugs, even if the drugs caused the death. I tend to lean to the 100 times figure now. That would mmean then that 4,200,000 die each year from psychotropic drugs using that perception.
Be it as it may be, I am concerned here about all 3 types of death. There are prohibitions to me from Mr. Hsiung comncerning that he prohibits me from posting what the bible says about those that use mind-altering drugs, or those that make them or give them to others. This prohibition is in discussion with me and Mr. Hsiung to another member that posted that the bible says that (redacted by respondent) which could mean that the Jewish children that (redacted by respondent) Jesus, are without forgivness and Eternal Life, as the poster claims the bible states, (does it?)(there is another prohibition to me here from Mr Hsiung that prevents me from posting my response to that). You can see that on the administrative board here and I am awaiting Mr. Hsiung's response to my request there that could or could not mean that there are two standards here or not. If he posts an answer to me there, I will have the opportunity to respond to whatever he posts to me there. If he does not post a response to my request, then others could think that what is in question there is {supportive}, because Mr. Hsiung states that support takes precedence and he does what in his thinking will be good for this community as a whole.(be advised that there is a historical parallel to that statement and Mr. Hsiung has a prohibition to me in relation to that so that I can not post what I would want to about that here.) And if you go to the admin board heyourself re and see that discussion, can you examine the discussion and determine if the discussion could lead people to think if the Jewish children and those Jews that do not accept the claim in question, and all of the other people that reject the claim in question, as to if or if not those people are being disrepected on this site?
Now here is a site that I am requesting for those interested to see. It could have answers to the 42000 and a lot more that I think could save lives or prevent one from getting a life-ruining condition or addiction from psychotropic drugs.
Lou
To see this:
A. Pull up Google
B. Type in:
[Psychiatric drugs and death-MRIPortal]
usually first
Posted by Phillipa on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:37
In reply to Lou's response- Death from psychiatric drugs, posted by Lou Pilder on March 23, 2012, at 16:45:47
Forget it folks some things just don't change. Phillipa
Posted by Elanor Roosevelt on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:38
In reply to Re: Lou's response- Death from psychiatric drugs, posted by Phillipa on March 23, 2012, at 19:00:41
who is lou?
never heard of him
Posted by Lou Pilder on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:38
In reply to Re: Lou's response- Death from psychiatric drugs, posted by Elanor Roosevelt on March 24, 2012, at 22:33:00
> who is lou?
> never heard of himER,
You wrote,[...who is (L)ou..never heard of him..].
I am not a member of any group but just an ordinary person that came to this site like others here. But as time ran, there became evident to me that the site could be dangerous to Jews and others do not accept the claims that are allowed to stand here by Mr. Hsiung.You can go to the administrative board and read there.
Then there is the fact that statements that people take a combination of mind-altering drugs that could cause death are allowed to be posted here without the adminstration interceding to tell the others of the potentisl of the combination of the drugs to cause death. I try to post educational material here to alert those concerned about the research and statistics that address that as support and education. I am not always able to post to all of those type of posts and it is IMHO a responsbility to do so, for I know that others could die. But could it not be a responsibility of the administration to post those type of warnings, for Mr. Hsiung states that he does what in his thinking will be good for the community as a whole? Now if death could come to members by him not posting a warming in relation to combinations of drugs causing death, then is there the potential for some to think that death good for the community as a whole?
Now in relation to the danger here that I see to Jews, there are statements being allowed to stand by Mr. Hsiung that could IMHHHHO arouse antisemitic feelings and then Jews could be targeted and become victims of antisemitic violence. I am prohibited by Mr. Hsiung from posting the historical parallels as to what happens when a community allows statements that defame Jews to stand. You can see this on the administartion board here and I do not accept any reasoning by Mr. Hsiung to allow those type of statements to stand here, for he states that one match could start a forest fire and he does not wait to stop the fire from starting.
So, you see, Mr. Hsiung and his deputy and his past deputies could control the content here by allowing or not allowing what is posted to be considered supportive. But do you not see that others could be swayed to think that statements that could have the potential to arouse antisemitic feelings that are allowed to stand are considered to be supportive by Mr Hsiung and his deputies that do his wishes because he states that support takes precedence?
So I am here to attempt to save lives. Lives that I think could be saved if I was not prohibited by Mr. Hsiung from posting what he prohibits me from posting. For you see, when one point of view is prohibited, then there could be an indoctrination created by the administration here. And the historical record shows how indoctrinations have swayed people's minds to hate others.
Lou
Posted by Oioioi123 on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:39
In reply to Lou's response- hulu, posted by Lou Pilder on March 25, 2012, at 7:37:07
Oh my god.... You are honestly psychotic or shizofrenic... I understand this guy(Lou) has a mental disorder and that's what this site is for but this guys is just straight nuts and can do nothing but bring this site and it's people down. He is obviously so far gone he cannot see or live in reality. PLEASE as the owner of this site and for the good of the members get rid of him!
> You wrote,[...who is (L)ou..never heard of him..].
> I am not a member of any group but just an ordinary person that came to this site like others here. But as time ran, there became evident to me that the site could be dangerous to Jews and others do not accept the claims that are allowed to stand here by Mr. Hsiung.You can go to the administrative board and read there.
> Then there is the fact that statements that people take a combination of mind-altering drugs that could cause death are allowed to be posted here without the adminstration interceding to tell the others of the potentisl of the combination of the drugs to cause death. I try to post educational material here to alert those concerned about the research and statistics that address that as support and education. I am not always able to post to all of those type of posts and it is IMHO a responsbility to do so, for I know that others could die. But could it not be a responsibility of the administration to post those type of warnings, for Mr. Hsiung states that he does what in his thinking will be good for the community as a whole? Now if death could come to members by him not posting a warming in relation to combinations of drugs causing death, then is there the potential for some to think that death good for the community as a whole?
> Now in relation to the danger here that I see to Jews, there are statements being allowed to stand by Mr. Hsiung that could IMHHHHO arouse antisemitic feelings and then Jews could be targeted and become victims of antisemitic violence. I am prohibited by Mr. Hsiung from posting the historical parallels as to what happens when a community allows statements that defame Jews to stand. You can see this on the administartion board here and I do not accept any reasoning by Mr. Hsiung to allow those type of statements to stand here, for he states that one match could start a forest fire and he does not wait to stop the fire from starting.
> So, you see, Mr. Hsiung and his deputy and his past deputies could control the content here by allowing or not allowing what is posted to be considered supportive. But do you not see that others could be swayed to think that statements that could have the potential to arouse antisemitic feelings that are allowed to stand are considered to be supportive by Mr Hsiung and his deputies that do his wishes because he states that support takes precedence?
> So I am here to attempt to save lives. Lives that I think could be saved if I was not prohibited by Mr. Hsiung from posting what he prohibits me from posting. For you see, when one point of view is prohibited, then there could be an indoctrination created by the administration here. And the historical record shows how indoctrinations have swayed people's minds to hate others.
> Lou
>
>
Posted by Dr. Bob on March 27, 2012, at 22:41:42
In reply to Re: Lou's response- hulu, posted by Oioioi123 on March 27, 2012, at 22:20:39
> everyone is sick and tired of his psychotic rants.
> this guys is just straight nuts and can do nothing but bring this site and it's people down.
Please don't post anything that could lead others to feel accused or put down.
But please don't take this personally, either, this doesn't mean I don't like you or think you're a bad person, and I'm sorry if this hurts you.
I do hope that you choose to remain a member of this community and that members of this community help you, if needed, to avoid future blocks. If you want to be proactive, you could ask another poster to be your civility buddy:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#buddies
It's up to you to decide whom you interact with. Sometimes interacting with others may be frustrating, staying civil may be a challenge, and new skills may help. If you're open to developing new skills (which I realize may not be why you came in the first place), that's another way in which you may be supported by other posters.
More information about posting policies and tips on alternative ways to express yourself, including a link to a nice post by Dinah on I-statements, are in the FAQ:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#civil
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#enforceFollow-ups regarding these issues should be redirected to Psycho-Babble Administration. They, as well as replies to the above post, should of course themselves be civil.
Thanks,
Bob
Posted by Phillipa on March 27, 2012, at 23:25:38
In reply to Re: blocked for week » Oioioi123, posted by Dr. Bob on March 27, 2012, at 22:41:42
How did this post get to the bottom of board? Was up further before? Phillipa
Posted by Dinah on March 27, 2012, at 23:33:52
In reply to Re: How, posted by Phillipa on March 27, 2012, at 23:25:38
Dr. Bob reposted and possibly combined. I appreciate that. The thread originator had requested that his thread not be diverted, and Dr. Bob notes above that this is why he moved the thread.
Posted by Phillipa on March 27, 2012, at 23:44:43
In reply to Re: How » Phillipa, posted by Dinah on March 27, 2012, at 23:33:52
Dinah thanks as I was posting ebay came here and thought I wass totally bonkers. Phillipa
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.