Shown: posts 1 to 2 of 2. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by utopizen on October 20, 2010, at 1:43:57
um, so... short of my doctor diagnosing me with the heart condition that Cialis is approved for under the brand as Arcadia(sp?), um, I was curious if anyone's had any luck with appealing with their doc and their insurance company about any rationale whatsoever for getting an ED drug in 30-day supply covered. Any? I use Medicare... Does that help with the appeals process?
I would imagine ED side effect is not valid enough, given ED alone is not valid? But, anyone aware of _anything_ that, well, is a rationale they've ever heard a drug company go along with?
Poor student; I'd like help/ideas... I don't have $500/month. =/
Does being poor help? What happened to insurance companies offering drugs for poor people to make us feel better? Is that not the case anymore?
I think I might talk to the Cialis benefits lady, and kind of tactfully ask her in a way what her experience has been for reasons that typically help for insurance companies... sigh. Please, God, let that recent patent suit over Cialis lose....
Posted by ed_uk2010 on October 20, 2010, at 13:45:58
In reply to Anyone ever have success with an ED drug appeal?, posted by utopizen on October 20, 2010, at 1:43:57
Perhaps there could be a non-Cialis solution. Many use a c-ring.
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.