![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 48 to 72 of 72. Go back in thread:
Posted by ricker on May 30, 2009, at 23:02:14
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by garnet71 on May 30, 2009, at 22:25:52
The topic of this thread, and a lot of it's content, goes to show just how much we need our meds.... and they really do "save lives"! :-)
Rick
Posted by greywolf on May 31, 2009, at 2:24:07
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by Andy Behrman on May 30, 2009, at 17:05:47
> But the drug companies hide not only side effects but mortality statistics during clinical trials - - not to mention slanting their studies to lessen what side effects "look like."
>
> Bristol Myers Squibb, and how they handled their wonder drug, Abilify, is a perfect example.
>
> And that's why it's making news!
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VzMZX4nBz8And this is where I think you're a little light. Give me the proof that the company is hiding mortality statistics attributable specifically to Abilify (as opposed to other meds or physical/mental conditions). Give me proof that the company is hiding potential side effects (I seem to remember a whole list of potential side effects in Abilify's accompanying literature). And give me proof that the company and the universities/hospitals working with it on multiple clinical trials slanted what the side effects would look like.
Finally, if information concerning the alleged excessive and unacceptable mortality rate of Abilify is so widespread, don't you wonder why all of these pyschiatrists supposedly in the know are still prescribing it? Either they don't care about the health of their patients or they're getting paid off.
I don't buy it and I think the video is unnecessarily scaring people based on anectdotal reports.
My suggestion is that you might better spend your time putting a class action lawsuit together proving your allegations than simply encouraging people you don't know to go after your doctor and Bristol.
Good luck.
Greywolf
Posted by Andy Behrman on May 31, 2009, at 2:32:15
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by greywolf on May 31, 2009, at 2:24:07
The doctors prescribing Abilify are being paid off in several ways -- I can assure you of that.
You may want to read this re: side effects of Abilify and "how BMS is hiding it."
http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/05/11/hiding-akathisia-in-abilify/
This is just one of MANY reports. You can google the rest.
The facts are there. And BMS can no longer hide. Because the media is on to their knowledge of both the side effects and the danger of Abilify and they've already reporting their crooked marketing techniques - - but there's plenty more that will be exposed in the next month/s.
After all, I had an inside view into what was going on at BMS for almost two years.
Stay tuned.
Posted by greywolf on May 31, 2009, at 2:43:46
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by Andy Behrman on May 31, 2009, at 2:32:15
> The doctors prescribing Abilify are being paid off in several ways -- I can assure you of that.
>
> You may want to read this re: side effects of Abilify and "how BMS is hiding it."
>
> http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/05/11/hiding-akathisia-in-abilify/
>
> This is just one of MANY reports. You can google the rest.
>
> The facts are there. And BMS can no longer hide. Because the media is on to their knowledge of both the side effects and the danger of Abilify and they've already reporting their crooked marketing techniques - - but there's plenty more that will be exposed in the next month/s.
>
> After all, I had an inside view into what was going on at BMS for almost two years.
>
> Stay tuned.
It's odd then that the first common side effect mentioned on Abilify's web site is akathisia occurring at more than twice the rate of the placebo.http://www.abilify.com/depression/aripiprazole/side-effects-faqs.aspx
Making akathisia your very first safety warning is an unusual way of hiding it.
Greywolf
Posted by Andy Behrman on May 31, 2009, at 2:48:17
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by greywolf on May 31, 2009, at 2:43:46
Apparently, you didn't read the article on the link. Maybe you should read it again.
Or, as Sonia Choi, the spokesman for BMS was quoted as saying, "I wasn't aware that akathasia was a side effect of Abilify."
The more important point is that it's a horrible side effect, extremely common and doctors are turning their backs on the problem and continuing to prescribe it. Sure, it's there. In fine print. But when a large percentage of consumers suffer from the side effect, don't you think it's time to think about the safety of Abilify?
Have you experienced the side effects of Abilify?
Posted by greywolf on May 31, 2009, at 2:58:50
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by Andy Behrman on May 31, 2009, at 2:48:17
I took Abilify for about 10 months. Didn't experience a single side effect or a single benefit. I treated it like I do all my meds--met with my doctor and told him it was ineffective for me so we discontinued it.
On many other occasions I've experienced moderate to severe side effects from certain medications and I did what I would hope most people would do--visited my doctor, explained the problem and, usually, discontinued that form of treatment. Seems like that's what people would naturally do if they were having problems with Abilify.
Greywolf
Posted by SLS on May 31, 2009, at 7:26:01
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by Andy Behrman on May 31, 2009, at 2:48:17
> Apparently, you didn't read the article on the link. Maybe you should read it again.
>
> Or, as Sonia Choi, the spokesman for BMS was quoted as saying, "I wasn't aware that akathasia was a side effect of Abilify."
>
> The more important point is that it's a horrible side effect, extremely common and doctors are turning their backs on the problem and continuing to prescribe it. Sure, it's there. In fine print. But when a large percentage of consumers suffer from the side effect, don't you think it's time to think about the safety of Abilify?
>
> Have you experienced the side effects of Abilify?
>
If you can find fault with the way Abilify has been marketed and dispensed, then I think that is where you ought to focus your attention. This is not the fault of the drug itself. The drug is what it is. What it is, is a lifesaver for me and many other people. The drug is unique and cannot be replaced by anything else in the current pharmacopia. Abiliy has side effects, some of them - akathisia specifically - that are due to this drug's unique pharmacology. It is this uniqueness that is the reason Abilify is chosen to be used in the first place. There is a significant chance that anyone starting Abilify will experience mild to moderate akathisia in the beginning. There is a good chance that if it appears, it will disappear within two weeks on its own. There is less of a chance that it will be so severe as to require discontinuation. However, this is a calculated risk, and one that is usually very easy to justify taking. This akathisia is not irreversible as would be tardive dyskinesia, which Abilify seems to be singularly exempt from producing among the neuroleptics.Abilify is not a demon drug. There are plenty "worse" if you are looking at side effect severity and irreversibility alone as criteria to forcibly remove a drug from the public healthcare system.
- Scott
Posted by linkadge on May 31, 2009, at 7:47:57
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us? » Andy Behrman, posted by SLS on May 31, 2009, at 7:26:01
I think these medications are killing us. Perhaps not outright. There seem to be a lot of common health problems among psych patients who have been taking medications for years. Especially bipolar and schizophrenia medications. Sure, its not cause and effect but you know.
Linkadge
Posted by SLS on May 31, 2009, at 10:05:26
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by garnet71 on May 30, 2009, at 22:25:52
> If you want to go around and say that hearing about bad doctors is old and tiresome
I never said that.
What I do find old and tiresome, though, is being subject to the endless train of generalizations made that all doctors are worthless and incompetent, and that psychiatry is quackery. This position is not only untenable, but it is also harmful. It prevents people from being vigilant in their seeking of adequate health care. It sabotages their trust of any doctor, and thus their treatment. It is just not accurate.
> after I just posted a comment in this thread that my whole life is falling apart due to the poor decisions of doctors, be my guest.
I am indeed sorry that you have had a bad time with things.
It is good that you now have explanations and understandings that you didn't have before.
As for me, I have learned that in order to move forward in the pursuit of successful medical treatment, I must first move past the mistakes of others and avoid the tendency to invest myself in fixing blame. This was not an overnight process, though.
- Scott
Posted by Larry Hoover on May 31, 2009, at 10:07:16
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by Andy Behrman on May 30, 2009, at 20:01:53
> But it's NOT accpetable that one person dies from a drug like Abilify - - and BMS has to be accountable.
It is unacceptable that the drug might be blamed for any deaths. The blood sugar irregularities are quite manageable with proper medical care.
In a less specific sense, it is far too easy to blame a drug manufacturer for a previously unrecognized severe side effect, particularly one with very low incidence.
But why focus on this one drug? Why interpret the situation so harshly? Non-steroidal inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are responsible for the deaths of 16,500 people each year in the United States. Depending on your age, the risk of dying from using them can be as high as 1 in every 647 people. Nobody thinks twice about taking a headache tablet, or chronic use for arthritis pain, and neither has the deadly consequences that might be associated with untreated major mental illness.
http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/booth/painpag/nsae/nsae.html
Lar
Posted by linkadge on May 31, 2009, at 10:22:40
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by SLS on May 31, 2009, at 10:05:26
Thats not true, psychiatry is only a partial quackery.
Linkadge
Posted by Larry Hoover on May 31, 2009, at 10:24:40
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by Andy Behrman on May 31, 2009, at 2:32:15
> You may want to read this re: side effects of Abilify and "how BMS is hiding it."
>
> http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2009/05/11/hiding-akathisia-in-abilify/Andy, these discussions are logically flawed. No matter what the incidence of akathisia might be, it is not possible to predict that side effect in any patient. It is thus impossible to prevent the side effect, unless the drug is simply not ever used at all. And any doctor and any patient who enter into a trial of any antipsychotic agent must be prepared for akathisia as a possible outcome. It's the nature of the treatment itself.
Moreover, the incidence of akathisia in antidepressant augmentation trials was never suppressed. It is fully and completely in the public domain.
Your evidence is also propaganda. Your pundits are the selective reporters.
Lar
Posted by SLS on May 31, 2009, at 10:52:59
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by linkadge on May 31, 2009, at 10:22:40
> Thats not true, psychiatry is only a partial quackery.
>
> Linkadge
LOLVery good.
- Scott
Posted by bulldog2 on May 31, 2009, at 15:58:53
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us? » linkadge, posted by SLS on May 31, 2009, at 10:52:59
> > Thats not true, psychiatry is only a partial quackery.
> >
> > Linkadge
>
>
> LOL
>
> Very good.
>
>
> - Scottpsychiatry is more art than science. Like a good chef cooking up a new recipe.
Posted by Larry Hoover on May 31, 2009, at 16:36:56
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by Andy Behrman on May 31, 2009, at 2:32:15
> This is just one of MANY reports.
Unfortunately, the plural of anecdote is not data.
I've addressed some important questions to you, and you've ignored each one. I can only form a negative opinion from that.
Lar
Posted by SLS on May 31, 2009, at 18:15:50
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by Andy Behrman on May 31, 2009, at 2:48:17
> Apparently, you didn't read the article on the link. Maybe you should read it again.
>
> Or, as Sonia Choi, the spokesman for BMS was quoted as saying, "I wasn't aware that akathasia was a side effect of Abilify."
>
> The more important point is that it's a horrible side effect, extremely common and doctors are turning their backs on the problem and continuing to prescribe it. Sure, it's there. In fine print. But when a large percentage of consumers suffer from the side effect, don't you think it's time to think about the safety of Abilify?Gosh. Many other neuroleptics produce akathisia, some worse than Abilify. Why single out this one drug? You said that Abilify treated you the worst of the 38 drugs you have tried. It sounds personal to me. It sounds like vengeance. You certainly have the privilege to express yourself. I disagree with you passionately, but I am happy that you have remained civil, despite having few advocates at the moment.
I don't know what the rate of coma and fatality is with Abilify. Do you? Isn't that the crux of the matter? To say that even one is too many is a rhetorical argument, and neglects the true value of a drug to society. Rare idiosyncratic reactions can occur with a great many important drugs. A couple of people taking prednisone have died of congestive heart failure. Of course, they had the biological vulnerability to have such a thing happen to them. A warning is contained in the drug monograph. Should we take this drug off the market?
What is the rate of coma and death as the result of taking Abilify?
If you cannot produce an answer to this question, then I imagine we have come to a good place to suspend this discussion as it relates to coma and fatalities. Otherwise, all of the other complaints you have about Abilify are already well recognized here on Psycho-Babble as potential side effects that we have seen emerge in real life. They range from being minor nuissances to being uncomfortable to being intolerable - just as with other psychotropics that give people back their lives. Your particular reaction to Abilify had more to do with your unique biological constitution than it did with some universal effect of the drug. The things that happened to you don't happen to me. Don't think for one minute that I am going to passively allow you to take this drug out of my mouth just because you didn't like the way it affected you individually.
- Scott
Posted by bulldog2 on May 31, 2009, at 18:35:47
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us? » Andy Behrman, posted by SLS on May 31, 2009, at 18:15:50
> > Apparently, you didn't read the article on the link. Maybe you should read it again.
> >
> > Or, as Sonia Choi, the spokesman for BMS was quoted as saying, "I wasn't aware that akathasia was a side effect of Abilify."
> >
> > The more important point is that it's a horrible side effect, extremely common and doctors are turning their backs on the problem and continuing to prescribe it. Sure, it's there. In fine print. But when a large percentage of consumers suffer from the side effect, don't you think it's time to think about the safety of Abilify?
>
> Gosh. Many other neuroleptics produce akathisia, some worse than Abilify. Why single out this one drug? You said that Abilify treated you the worst of the 38 drugs you have tried. It sounds personal to me. It sounds like vengeance. You certainly have the privilege to express yourself. I disagree with you passionately, but I am happy that you have remained civil, despite having few advocates at the moment.
>
> I don't know what the rate of coma and fatality is with Abilify. Do you? Isn't that the crux of the matter? To say that even one is too many is a rhetorical argument, and neglects the true value of a drug to society. Rare idiosyncratic reactions can occur with a great many important drugs. A couple of people taking prednisone have died of congestive heart failure. Of course, they had the biological vulnerability to have such a thing happen to them. A warning is contained in the drug monograph. Should we take this drug off the market?
>
> What is the rate of coma and death as the result of taking Abilify?
>
> If you cannot produce an answer to this question, then I imagine we have come to a good place to suspend this discussion as it relates to coma and fatalities. Otherwise, all of the other complaints you have about Abilify are already well recognized here on Psycho-Babble as potential side effects that we have seen emerge in real life. They range from being minor nuissances to being uncomfortable to being intolerable - just as with other psychotropics that give people back their lives. Your particular reaction to Abilify had more to do with your unique biological constitution than it did with some universal effect of the drug. The things that happened to you don't happen to me. Don't think for one minute that I am going to passively allow you to take this drug out of my mouth just because you didn't like the way it affected you individually.
>
>
> - Scott
>Again I ask why are psychotropic drugs being singled out? I know of a child who took an antibiotic and died of aplastic anemia. Thousands die from advil and tylenol use. If your liver is destroyed by tylenol do we go on a crusade against it?I repeat once more all drugs have the potential to kill and injure. Why do doctors tell us to use a nsaid for inflammation when we risk ruining our and stomach. This is medicine today. There is nothing unique about psychotropic drugs.
The reality is stop using meds and be all natural if you fear sides. Not just psychotropic drugs but all drugs. The next advil you swallow for a heaache may kill you!!
Posted by Sigismund on May 31, 2009, at 18:56:59
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us? » Andy Behrman, posted by Larry Hoover on May 31, 2009, at 10:07:16
>But why focus on this one drug? Why interpret the situation so harshly? Non-steroidal inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are responsible for the deaths of 16,500 people each year in the United States. Depending on your age, the risk of dying from using them can be as high as 1 in every 647 people. Nobody thinks twice about taking a headache tablet, or chronic use for arthritis pain, and neither has the deadly consequences that might be associated with untreated major mental illness
That is a good example of the toxicity of the meds we have. I have a neighbour who had her gut resectioned after years of use of NSAIDs. There are alternatives, effective ones that I use, but they are more expensive and are not made by pharmaceutical companies.
Posted by Elanor Roosevelt on May 31, 2009, at 22:28:07
In reply to Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by Andy Behrman on May 29, 2009, at 4:24:52
I don't have to watch the video to answer "yes"
however, I'm 57 and this is the age when the darkness and confusion killed my dad
so i'll stay with the meds for now
Posted by Andy Behrman on May 31, 2009, at 22:35:41
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by Elanor Roosevelt on May 31, 2009, at 22:28:07
Again, Abilify is just an example of so many other drugs that have horrendous side effects, but which doctors continue to prescribe. Of course, some people benefit from these drugs, but for others, the side effects are worse than the original symptoms.
The ABILIFY KILLS video is an example.
But from my own personal experience, it has been the worst drug for me and I have heard from both patients and doctors about nightmarish experiences with Abilify.
I'm glad that this thread has sparked interest and brought to light the issue of side effect - - and their dangers.
Posted by SLS on June 1, 2009, at 5:08:49
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by Andy Behrman on May 31, 2009, at 22:35:41
> I'm glad that this thread has sparked interest and brought to light the issue of side effect - - and their dangers.
...As well as the virtues of psychotropic drugs and the choices to which we are entitled to accept the potential risks along with the potential benefits they have to offer. Yes. Good thread.
As someone is so insightful to keep stating, psychotropic drugs are the targets of activists whom lobby to abolish them more often than are any other class of drug. Is mental illness less serious than other illnesses; either in the degree of pain suffered or the rate of fatalities observed? It sure seems that many of these people never mention this seriousness nor take it into consideration when formulating their opinions. I get an uncomfortable feeling that there is more venom than facts coming from them. That, of course, is only an opinion, although it is a fact that I do react that way, just as it is a fact that you react the way you do to Abilify. No one is taking that away from you. However, your reaction was not of the same degree of severity as what is claimed, so why are you touting coma and death as untoward effects of this drug if you have no personal experience nor statistics to apprise us of?
- Scott
Posted by bulldog2 on June 1, 2009, at 9:09:31
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us? » Andy Behrman, posted by SLS on June 1, 2009, at 5:08:49
> > I'm glad that this thread has sparked interest and brought to light the issue of side effect - - and their dangers.
>
> ...As well as the virtues of psychotropic drugs and the choices to which we are entitled to accept the potential risks along with the potential benefits they have to offer. Yes. Good thread.
>
> As someone is so insightful to keep stating, psychotropic drugs are the targets of activists whom lobby to abolish them more often than are any other class of drug. Is mental illness less serious than other illnesses; either in the degree of pain suffered or the rate of fatalities observed? It sure seems that many of these people never mention this seriousness nor take it into consideration when formulating their opinions. I get an uncomfortable feeling that there is more venom than facts coming from them. That, of course, is only an opinion, although it is a fact that I do react that way, just as it is a fact that you react the way you do to Abilify. No one is taking that away from you. However, your reaction was not of the same degree of severity as what is claimed, so why are you touting coma and death as untoward effects of this drug if you have no personal experience nor statistics to apprise us of?
>
>
> - ScottWhat is troubling is that the people of this forum who would be the most hurt if these drugs were abolished have seemed to eagerly jump on let's bash psychotropic drugs.
Let's look at chemo drugs. If ever there were a nasty group of medieval drugs that poison the body and the tumor and hopefully the tumor dies first. You don't have a chorus of people calling for the abolishment. And they are truely a nightmare. Pyschotropic drugs are almost benign in sides when compared to them.
Posted by Sigismund on June 1, 2009, at 20:05:09
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by bulldog2 on June 1, 2009, at 9:09:31
Many drugs that could be helpful become drugs of abuse and are disallowed.
Subjective unpleasantness seems to be a prerequisite for psych drugs, lest they become drugs of abuse.
Posted by SLS on June 1, 2009, at 20:43:30
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by Sigismund on June 1, 2009, at 20:05:09
> Many drugs that could be helpful become drugs of abuse and are disallowed.
>
> Subjective unpleasantness seems to be a prerequisite for psych drugs, lest they become drugs of abuse.Yeah. It doesn't make sense to me that a good drug should be withheld from the public just because some people come to abuse it. The case of amineptine (Survector) always comes to mind when it comes to antidepressants. Caffeine has been shown to be a psychostimulant and a physical performance enhancer, and leads to physical dependence, but you don't see a call for it to be banned or demonized.
My point is that one cannot control the behavior of the public when it comes to the abuse of medicinal drugs. This is not a reflection on the worth of the drug to treat a set of conditions. Cocaine is still a legal medicinal substance used as an anesthetic for ophthalmological procedures. Why should the ill be penalized for the behavior of the healthy?
- Scott
Posted by Sigismund on June 1, 2009, at 21:06:07
In reply to Re: Are the drugs that we're taking killing us?, posted by SLS on June 1, 2009, at 20:43:30
I want to see double blind trials of chewed coca leaf with the appropriate alkali against all known ADs.
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.