![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 158 to 182 of 187. Go back in thread:
Posted by Nickengland on August 5, 2005, at 14:46:45
In reply to Re: I think it's ironic » Nickengland, posted by gabbii on August 5, 2005, at 12:09:05
Yep its definately got way out of hand, I agree. I mean this was all because I saw a coincidence in the first place and barosky seemed to agree to that....
I am aware that you have a low tolerance of speculation for other posters to who you care about and you may have taken this personally too. If I choose to post about another poster though, i'm not responsible for your low tolerance levels if you know what I mean, but I'll do my best to avoid raising them.
Consider your part in this discussion dropped then....I can't stop you replying though ;-) I only say 'your' part by the way because i'm not sure if others will have any more problems with what I have to say, I mean being the fact that 'being' might be uncivil in some peoples eyes I begin to question my own sanity as I type this, that perhaps someone is now going to find a part of this uncivil.
I realise now theres a good chance you never want to speak about 'so' again, certainly not with me anyway. But i'd love to know which issues you valued so much that he had to say, bearing in mind you valued so much of what he had to say....Perhaps another time....in the mean time I hope I haven't upset you too much..
Warm regards
Nick
Posted by Nickengland on August 5, 2005, at 14:55:52
In reply to Re: I don't want to make any enemies here... » Nickengland, posted by Slinky on August 5, 2005, at 11:38:26
Slinky... I was/am speechless. Excellent, absolutely brillant. You never seize to amaze me :-)
That is just the diversion I needed in my thoughts to take me off of this subject..
Regards to you too
Nick
Posted by gabbii on August 5, 2005, at 16:00:35
In reply to Re: I think it's ironic » gabbii, posted by Nickengland on August 5, 2005, at 14:46:45
> I am aware that you have a low tolerance of speculation for other posters to who you care about and you may have taken this personally too.
When I made that statement I was referring to a female poster who's been here for over a year
(that's why I said regular babblers)
I won't say her name, but she knows who she is.
No, I didn't take this personally. I was frustrated that the original topic I'd adressed changed into a discussion of specific incidents, with particular posters. If the original post had offered any indication of that, I would not have responded.
Posted by Nickengland on August 5, 2005, at 16:45:05
In reply to Re: I think it's ironic » Nickengland, posted by gabbii on August 5, 2005, at 16:00:35
I was kinda frustrated that the original topic of my discussion went way off too and I ended up explaining why I had to say things like 'kind regards' etc
Anyway, thats quite enough negativity for oneday.
Give me an update though if you'd be so kind - do I owe you an appology, more importantly, would you accept?
Posted by AuntieMel on August 5, 2005, at 17:08:21
In reply to Re: I think it's ironic » Nickengland, posted by gabbii on August 5, 2005, at 16:00:35
If it's me, I'm sorry for anything I said.
Posted by gabbii on August 5, 2005, at 17:10:23
In reply to Re: I think it's ironic » gabbii, posted by Nickengland on August 5, 2005, at 16:45:05
> I was kinda frustrated that the original topic of my discussion went way off too and I ended up explaining why I had to say things like 'kind regards' etc
>
> Anyway, thats quite enough negativity for oneday.
>
Heartily agreed!
> Give me an update though if you'd be so kind - do I owe you an appology, more importantly, would you accept?No, no apology necessary Nick, let's just forget the whole messy thing okay?
Thanks much.
Posted by gabbii on August 5, 2005, at 17:16:54
In reply to Re: I think it's ironic » gabbii, posted by AuntieMel on August 5, 2005, at 17:08:21
> If it's me, I'm sorry for anything I said.
>
>Auntie Mel?
Are you okay? Oh my, this had nothing remotely to do with you.
And if something you had said upset me, I'd discuss it with you. On the outside it may look b*tchy, but I'll say if I'm offended, but I'd rather be able to be out with it, and possibly clear it up, rather than have someone think I'm stewing.
Posted by crushedout on August 5, 2005, at 17:31:20
In reply to Re: I think it's ironic » AuntieMel, posted by gabbii on August 5, 2005, at 17:16:54
it's one of my favorite qualities in a person. :)
Posted by Nickengland on August 5, 2005, at 17:46:49
In reply to Re: I think it's ironic » Nickengland, posted by gabbii on August 5, 2005, at 17:10:23
Have you ever woken up from one of those disgusting hangovers from drinking loads of alcohol - only to say......
"Oh, No...Never...Ever again am I going to put myself through that again..Aarrhhhhhh!!!"
Thats kind a like how I feel after ending a heated debate here on good old administration lol
Oh man, there certainly is a lovely warm relief i'm feeling now this is over. Beautiful :-)
So glad everything has ended well with us Gabbii...
My mood have been pretty sensitive lately as I've been adapting to new medication. I know this is really not relevant at all to anything, but well, maybe its been reflected in my posts. I honestly do think i'm seroiusly losing my mind sometimes with the things I talk about on here, I must of really made myself look like a prick....I honestly feel i do have to say sorry, I shouldn't be making people feel frustrated because of my life situation right now...its not quite right.This is even more irrevelent lol I can't believe I havent noticed it before...I'm mostly talking to women in Admin right? I honestly do think I have lost the plot...As in - I should not be arguing with women! Bloody hell no wonder i'm single. Seriously I actually forget i'm talking with females i think and then vent my anger out like I was talking to a man. Its not right, for one thing, in real life i'd be competing with the man and chatting up the lady. Now i'm totally confused and on that note on leaving lol
Take care xXx
Posted by gabbii on August 5, 2005, at 17:52:07
In reply to Re: I think it's ironic, posted by Nickengland on August 5, 2005, at 17:46:49
>
> So glad everything has ended well with us Gabbii...
>, I shouldn't be making people feel frustrated because of my life situation right now...its not quite right.
>
> This is even more irrevelent lol I can't believe I havent noticed it before...I'm mostly talking to women in Admin right? I honestly do think I have lost the plot...As in - I should not be arguing with women! Bloody hell no wonder i'm single. Seriously I actually forget i'm talking with females i think and then vent my anger out like I was talking to a man. Its not right, for one thing, in real life i'd be competing with the man and chatting up the lady. Now i'm totally confused and on that note on leaving lol
>Gabbi is a fragile blossom, no venting anger on her, you must defer and be delicate at all times.
(or she'll knock you upside the head) *smile*
Posted by AuntieMel on August 5, 2005, at 18:03:44
In reply to Re: I think it's ironic » AuntieMel, posted by gabbii on August 5, 2005, at 17:16:54
I hoped not, but I wasn't sure. We seemed to be miscommunicating a bit there on CT's block.
Very relieved.
Posted by gabbii on August 5, 2005, at 18:03:45
In reply to i like that about you » gabbii, posted by crushedout on August 5, 2005, at 17:31:20
>
> it's one of my favorite qualities in a person. :)Thank you
It's one of mine too, I mean not every little thing needs to be said, but if it's enough to affect a relationship, it's important to me.
Thanks miss OUT
Posted by AuntieMel on August 5, 2005, at 18:06:02
In reply to Re: I think it's ironic, posted by Nickengland on August 5, 2005, at 17:46:49
Ane that is what makes for true equality of the sexes. When you can vent just as much without thinking about it.
Posted by AuntieMel on August 5, 2005, at 18:17:20
In reply to Re: I think it's ironic » AuntieMel, posted by gabbii on August 5, 2005, at 17:16:54
I have been more stressed than usual, so probably touchy
Posted by gabbii on August 5, 2005, at 18:34:19
In reply to Re: And » gabbii, posted by AuntieMel on August 5, 2005, at 18:17:20
> I have been more stressed than usual, so probably touchy
I didn't think it was touchy, I was worried that you were depressed, when I start becoming depressed I become ultra sensitive and think I'm being rejected everywhere.
I'm not sure where we miscommunicated on CTs block, (which means we must have)
But I can assure you, even if we had, even if we had disagreed, it wouldn't be enough for me to be be angry with you, never mind, for days!!
no no no no no...
I can probably count on one hand the times I've been angry enough at someone here to have it actually carry over into my interaction with them.Plus I like you Auntie Mel.
Posted by Dr. Bob on August 6, 2005, at 0:31:10
In reply to Re: THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT!!!!!!!!!, posted by barosky on August 3, 2005, at 16:38:35
> I am vehemently opposed to Dr. Bob's strict policies
Sorry, but when you're blocked, you're not supposed to post. The last time you were blocked it was for 9 weeks, so this time it's for 18.
If you or others have questions about this or about posting policies in general, or are interested in alternative ways of expressing yourself, please see the FAQ:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#names
Thanks,
Bob
Posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 0:34:32
In reply to Re: blocked » barosky, posted by Dr. Bob on August 6, 2005, at 0:31:10
via babblemail is fine. i'm ALWAYS LOST
Posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 0:47:47
In reply to can someone please let me know what's going on, posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 0:34:32
>
>Well NOW at least there's proof he wasn't SO
So was blocked for 6 weeks..
Posted by Dr. Bob on August 6, 2005, at 1:38:34
In reply to Re: I think it's ironic » gabbii, posted by Nickengland on August 5, 2005, at 14:46:45
> I don't think people who criticize how it is run now should be made to feel as if they should go elsewhere.
>
> gabbiiMaybe it depends partly on what the reason would be for them to go elsewhere? If the idea is it might be better for them, that's one thing, and it would seem to be their decision. OTOH, if the idea is it might be better for the community, that would be an administrative issue -- and could be uncivil if not expressed carefully.
--
> > well being a hetrosexual male i'm not into wearing pink knickers,
>
> i don't appreciate the implication that gay men are into wearing pink knickers
>
> crushedoutI agree, that was the implication. It seems you two worked it out?
--
> I am aware that you have a low tolerance of speculation
>
> NickI think there can be a fine line between speculation and posts that jump to conclusions or could lead others to feel accused, so I think my tolerance is kind of low, too. Thanks,
Bob
Posted by Nickengland on August 6, 2005, at 4:16:18
In reply to Re: can someone please let me know what's going on » crushedout, posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 0:47:47
>Well NOW at least there's proof he wasn't SO
So was blocked for 6 weeks..Ok Gabbi lol
I was on to something though hey, with my amateur detective work I think?...I mean he was actually a blocked poster who was posting, so there was a link there. I know, we were both right!...you was right, he wasn't 'so', I was right he was a blocked poster. I was also wrong he wasn't 'so', but lets keep that our little secret ;-)
I have 2 questions for you Gabbi (of course now we're working together and not disputing together :-))
I thought 'so' was blocked for 6 weeks too, but then I remember dinah brought up some further issues about him then posting straight after the block under that different name of human_rights and so that block was spoke about being increased to 18 weeks or something? I never actually knew the exact length of the block from all those different posts. I asked, firslty Dr Bob said 6 weeks, but then there was talk abiout 18 weeks or something, so i'm a little confused there?
And the final question, who is barosky do you think gabbi? After all what has happened I'd be very curious to know rather look whos recently been blocked for 9 weeks...
Kind regards
Nick
Posted by Nickengland on August 6, 2005, at 4:36:29
In reply to Re: people who criticize how it is run, posted by Dr. Bob on August 6, 2005, at 1:38:34
> i don't appreciate the implication that gay men are into wearing pink knickers
>
> crushedout>I agree, that was the implication. It seems you two worked it out?
Seeing as I was the one who wrote the sentance I strongly disagree that there was no implication whatsoever towards gay men at all.
This is because I used the word 'being' instead of 'I am'
The only implication here is that I used the wrong grammer or wording. Speaking and writing English - English can be different from speaking and writing American - English, I'm sure your aware of that. I am English.
The main problem I have with my statement having anything to do with gay men at all, is the fact, that in some ways it has the implication that I am homophobic. This is what I feel towards me anyway, when all this is down to using 'being' instead of 'I am'
Seems abit silly that i've been tripped up on some kind of legal loop hole for the political correct grammer police. Although i've learnt now obviously to use my wording more carefully for the future.
Posted by Nickengland on August 6, 2005, at 5:02:41
In reply to Re: people who criticize how it is run » Dr. Bob, posted by Nickengland on August 6, 2005, at 4:36:29
>Seems abit silly that i've been tripped up on some kind of legal loop hole for the political correct grammer police. Although i've learnt now obviously to use my wording more carefully for the future.
Sorry, that was poorly worded on my part, where I say "political correct grammer police" - as in it has the potential to feel that crushedout is a police officer of this type of policing!...and then in turn to feel put down by me over generlising, or over exadurating.
I apologise to you crushed out as I was thinking out loud and it was not meant to be aimed at you with that wording. I retract that statement.
LOL Its a good indicator my moods are still sensitive - good thing i'm quickly realising that fact and soon will be able to "think" more carefully, before I open my mouth so to speak! Last thing I want to do is start more tension with anyone, more importantly, yourself crushedout.
Warm regards
Nick
Posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 5:53:21
In reply to Interesting Twist of Events » gabbii, posted by Nickengland on August 6, 2005, at 4:16:18
> >Well NOW at least there's proof he wasn't SO
> So was blocked for 6 weeks..
>
> Ok Gabbi lol
>
> I was on to something though hey, with my amateur detective work I think?...I mean he was actually a blocked poster who was posting, so there was a link there. I know, we were both right!...you was right, he wasn't 'so', I was right he was a blocked poster. I was also wrong he wasn't 'so', but lets keep that our little secret ;-)
>
Okay
> I have 2 questions for you Gabbi (of course now we're working together and not disputing together :-))
>
> I thought 'so' was blocked for 6 weeks too, but then I remember dinah brought up some further issues about him then posting straight after the block under that different name of human_rights and so that block was spoke about being increased to 18 weeks or something? I never actually knew the exact length of the block from all those different posts. I asked, firslty Dr Bob said 6 weeks, but then there was talk abiout 18 weeks or something, so i'm a little confused there?
>
Actually I have no idea, I think I saw one thread that said 6 weeks, but as for any discussion after that I probably missed it.> And the final question, who is barosky do you think gabbi? After all what has happened I'd be very curious to know rather look whos recently been blocked for 9 weeks...
>Well now, I knew So was not Barosky, call it Women's intuation, but it was clear to me, and I so I said something As for finding out who Barosky was.. I think Columbo, :) there are probably a few more posters who are better at that than I am and will be more than happy to figure with you.
Take Care Nick
>
Posted by Nickengland on August 6, 2005, at 6:13:15
In reply to Re: Interesting Twist of Events » Nickengland, posted by gabbii on August 6, 2005, at 5:53:21
Type in blocked for 9 weeks in the goodle seach, you get mike13.
Other than that i'm retired as columbo.
Your take care too.
Posted by crushedout on August 6, 2005, at 9:00:07
In reply to Re: people who criticize how it is run, posted by Dr. Bob on August 6, 2005, at 1:38:34
> I agree, that was the implication. It seems you two worked it out?I'm glad you agree that that was the implication. I'm not really sure that we worked anything out, but that's ok.
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.