Psycho-Babble Social | for general support | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: informant

Posted by alexandra_k on June 7, 2019, at 23:10:12

In reply to Re: informant, posted by alexandra_k on June 7, 2019, at 22:58:25

They did have an okay ethics statement sort of a thing. There were some good ideas. About the spirit of the rules. About how you try and apply that. About accountability for that. About how you will be in trouble if they think you cannot grasp something along the lines of the spirit which results in your doing things that a bunch of people find problematic...

It read well. Seemed sensible. Wasn't idiotic.

The compulsory typographical error / equivalent.

That doesn't actually matter.

But pops out. In a synasthesia kind of a way.

Working for Doctors, Working for Patients.

Maybe less capital letters. Sigh. I'm not sure. Some stuff pops out. I don't know why. Other stuff I don't seem to be able to grasp, particularly. Apostrophe rule. My issues are to do with singular vs group. Apparently that isnt' the issue so much as possession. Huh. There are Deep Issues There. Hrmph.




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Social | Framed

poster:alexandra_k thread:1104778