Posted by ace on August 9, 2006, at 1:42:31
Here are the answers bro! In my humble estimation, Nardil has not changed anywhere.
First of all, the online pharmacy you got Nardil from might well be Link. But, Link probably imported your bottles fo some unknown reason (he could not elaborate)Link states that they have done no new 'work' on Nardil, and that their Nardil is 100% bioequivalant to that of the initial Nardil.
1. "did they (Link) at any time put silica gel inside their bottles of Nardil to keep tablets fresh" -- NO2. This negation of silica gel inside of Nardil bottle thus renders your other qstns invalid.
They have not have had any adverse reaction reports at all. Australian, or other countries.Any changes to Nardil would have to be through TGA (equivalant body of FDA) - TGA denies any changes.
No Silica gel, ever in Link Nardil, but plausible that Link might have imported some with silica gel inside.
Further more, the gentleman I spoke to believed the Silica gel issue was of no consequence to the drugs efficay. Also, the issue of refrigement was raised. This was dictated by TGA. But was not brought about by any changes in chemical composition/incipients. The man I spoke to believed that Nardil SHOULD ALWAYS have been refrigerated.
I hope this helps! It probably doesn't...please feel free to email me, and I will happily give you Links number and any other details.
Cheers bro, and so sorry for the late reply!!!!
Ace
poster:ace
thread:675108
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20060802/msgs/675108.html